1887
Volume 9, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Reply to commentaries, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/lab.00027.goa-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.00027.goa
2019-11-14
2019-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dekydtspotter, L., Donaldson, B., Edmonds, A. C., Liljestrand Fultz, A., & Petrush, R. A.
    (2008) Syntactic and prosodic computations in the resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguity by English-French learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 453–480. 10.1017/S0272263108080728
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080728 [Google Scholar]
  2. Demuth, K., & Tremblay, A.
    (2008) Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35, 99–127. 10.1017/S0305000907008276
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008276 [Google Scholar]
  3. Goad, H., & White, L.
    (2009) Prosodic transfer and the representation of determiners in Turkish-English interlanguage. InN. Snape, Y.-k. I. Leung, & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins (pp.1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.47.04goa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.47.04goa [Google Scholar]
  4. Goad, H., White, L., Garcia, G. D., Guzzo, N. B., Mortazavinia, M., Smeets, L., & Su, J.
    (2018, September). Pronoun interpretation in L2 Italian: Prosodic effects revisited. Paper presented atGenerative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America (GALANA) 8, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Goad, H., Guzzo, N. B., & White, L.
    (submitted). Parsing ambiguous relative clauses in L2 English: Learner sensitivity to prosodic cues.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Grijzenhout, J., & Penke, M.
    (2005) On the interaction of phonology and morphology in language acquisition and Broca’s Aphasia: The case of inflected verbs. InG. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2005 (pp.49–81). Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑4066‑0_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4066-0_3 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hawkins, R.
    (2000) Persistent selective fossilisation in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 34, 75–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lardiere, D.
    (2009) Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227. 10.1177/0267658308100283
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100283 [Google Scholar]
  9. Lieberman, M.
    (2013, January). The importance of comprehension to a rounded view of second language acquisition. Paper presented at theDepartment of Linguistics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Prévost, P. & White, L.
    (2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133. 10.1191/026765800677556046
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765800677556046 [Google Scholar]
  11. Selkirk, E. O.
    (1996) The prosodic structure of function words. InJ. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp.187–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Trenkic, D.
    (2007) Variability in L2 article production – beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, 23, 289–327. 10.1177/0267658307077643
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307077643 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.00027.goa
Loading
  • Article Type: Reply
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error