Objects of transitive verbs in Italian as a heritage language in contact with German

References

1. Abraham, W. , & Wiegel, A.
   (1993) Reduktionsformen und Kasussynkretismus bei deutschen und niederländischen Pronomina. In W. Abraham , & J. Bayer (Eds.), Dialektsyntax (pp.12–49). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑322‑97032‑9_2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97032-9_2 [Google Scholar]
2. Alarcón, I.V.
   (2011) Spanish gender agreement under complete and incomplete acquisition: early and late bilinguals´ linguistic behavior within the noun phrase. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 332–350. doi: 10.1017/S1366728910000222
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000222 [Google Scholar]
3. Allan, D.
   (2004) Oxford Placement Test 1- Test Pack. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arencibia Guerra, L.
   (2008) Sprachdominanz bei bilingualen Kindern mit Deutsch und Französisch, Italienisch oder Spanisch als Erstsprachen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wuppertal.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Benmamoun, E. , Montrul, S. , & Polinsky, M.
   (2013a) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(3–4), 129–181.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Benmamoun, E. , Montrul, S. , & Polinsky, M.
   (2013b) Defining an ‘ideal’ Heritage Speaker: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges. Reply to Peer Commentaries. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(3–4), 259–294.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Birkner, K. , Henricson, S. , Lindholm, C. , & Pfeiffer, M.
   (2012) Grammar and self-repair: Retraction patterns in German and Swedish prepositional phrases. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1413–1433. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.003 [Google Scholar]
8. Bossong, G.
   (2008) Die romanischen Sprachen. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cazzoli-Goeta, M. , Rothman, J. , & Young-Scholten, M.
   (2008) Cross-disciplinary investigation of heritage language variation. GLOW Newsletter, 60.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) Categories and transformations. InThe Minimalist Program (pp.219–394). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cinque, G.
    (1990) Types of A‘-Dependencies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Di Venanzio, L. , Schmitz, K. , & Rumpf, A.-L.
    (2012) Objektrealisierungen und -auslassungen bei transitiven Verben im Spanischen von Herkunftssprechern in Deutschland. Linguistische Berichte, 232, 437–461.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Domínguez, L.
    (2009) Charting the route of bilingual development: Contributions from heritage speakers´ early acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 271–287. doi: 10.1177/1367006909339812
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339812 [Google Scholar]
14. Erwin, D. , & Fedele, M. T.
    (2011) Modern Neapolitan Grammar/Grammatica napoletana odierna. 2nd Edition. Retrieved on16 February 2014, fromneapolitan.casaerwin.org.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fischer, S. , & Rinke, E.
    (2013) Explaining the variability of clitic doubling across Romance: a diachronic account. Linguistische Berichte, 236, 455–472.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Flores, C. M.
    (2012) Differential effects of language attrition in the domain of verb placement and object expression. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 550–567. doi: 10.1017/S1366728911000666
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000666 [Google Scholar]
17. Gabriel, C. , & Müller, N.
    (2005) Zu den romanischen Pronominalklitika: Kategorialer Status und syntaktische Derivation. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Deutsche Romanistik - Generativ (pp.161–180). Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kohler, K.
    (1995) Einführung in die Phonetik des Deutschen. 2nd Edition. Berlin: Schmidt.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kuchenbrandt, I. , Kupisch, T. , & Rinke, E.
    (2005) Pronominal Objects in Romance: Comparing French, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian and Spanish. Working Papers in Multilingualism, Series B. Hamburg: University of Hamburg.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kupisch, T.
    (2012) Specific and generic subjects in the Italian of German-Italian simultaneous bilinguals and L2 learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 736–756. doi: 10.1017/S1366728911000691
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000691 [Google Scholar]
21. Kupisch, T.
    (2013) A new term for a better distinction? A view from the higher end of the proficiency scale. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(3–4), 203–214.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Monachesi, P.
    (1993) Object clitics and clitic climbing in Italian HPSG grammar. In Proceedings of the sixth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp.437–442). Utrecht: University of Utrecht. doi: 10.3115/976744.976796
    https://doi.org/10.3115/976744.976796 [Google Scholar]
23. Montrul, S.
    (2004) Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142. doi: 10.1017/S1366728904001464
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001464 [Google Scholar]
24. Montrul, S.
    (2008) Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sibil.39
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.39 [Google Scholar]
25. Montrul, S.
    (2010a) Current issues in heritage language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 3–23. doi: 10.1017/S0267190510000103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000103 [Google Scholar]
26. Montrul, S.
    (2010b) How similar are adult L2 learners and Spanish heritage speakers?Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 167–207. doi: 10.1017/S014271640999021X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640999021X [Google Scholar]
27. Montrul, S. , & Bowles, M.
    (2009) Back to basics: Incomplete acquisition of Differential Object Marking in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(3), 363–383. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990071
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990071 [Google Scholar]
28. Mougeon, R. , Nadasdi, T. , & Rehner, K.
    (2005) Contact-induced linguistic innovations on the continuum of language use: the case of French in Ontario. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(2), 99–115. doi: 10.1017/S1366728905002142
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728905002142 [Google Scholar]
29. Müller, N. , & Hulk, A.
    (2001) Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1017/S1366728901000116
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728901000116 [Google Scholar]
30. Müller, N. , Schmitz, K. , Cantone, K. , & Kupisch, T.
    (2006) Null arguments in monolingual children – A comparison of Italian and French. In V. Torrens , & L. Escobar (Eds.), The Acquisition of Syntax in Romance Languages (pp.69–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.41.05mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.41.05mul [Google Scholar]
31. Müller, N. , Kupisch, T. , Schmitz, K. , & Cantone, K.
    (2011) Einführung in die Mehrsprachigkeitsforschung. 3rd Edition. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Nagy, N. , Aghdasi, N. , Denis, D. , & Motut, A.
    (2011) Null subjects in heritage languages: Contact effects in a cross-linguistic context. Selected Papers from NWAV 39. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 17(2).
    [Google Scholar]
33. Pascual y Cabo, D. , & Rothman, J.
    (2012) The (il)logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 450–455. doi: 10.1093/applin/ams037
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams037 [Google Scholar]
34. Pires, A. , & Rothman, J.
    (2009) Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation for competence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 211–238. doi: 10.1177/1367006909339806
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339806 [Google Scholar]
35. Platz-Schliebs, A. , Schmitz, K. , Müller, N. , & Merino Claros, E.
    (2012) Einführung in die Romanische Sprachwissenschaft. Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Polinsky, M.
    (1997) American Russian: Language loss meets language acquisition. In W. Browne , E. Dornsich , N. Kondrashova , & D. Zec (Eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Cornell Meeting (1995) (pp.370–406). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Polinsky, M.
    (2006) Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191–262.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Polinsky, M. , & Kagan, O.
    (2007) Heritage languages in the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 368–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00022.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00022.x [Google Scholar]
39. Putnam, M. , & Sánchez, L.
    (2013) What's so incomplete about incomplete acquisition? A prolegomenon to modeling heritage language grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(4), 476–506. doi: 10.1075/lab.3.4.04put
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.3.4.04put [Google Scholar]
40. Rizzi, L.
    (1986) Null Objects in italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(3), 501–557.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rothman, J.
    (2007) Heritage speaker competence differences, language change and input type: inflected infinitives in Heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 359–389. doi: 10.1177/13670069070110040201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069070110040201 [Google Scholar]
42. Rothman, J.
    (2009) Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 155–163. doi: 10.1177/1367006909339814
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339814 [Google Scholar]
43. Rothman, J. , & Treffers-Daller, J.
    (2014) A Prolegomenon to the Construct of the Native Speaker: Heritage Speaker Bilinguals are Natives Too!Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 93–98. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt049
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt049 [Google Scholar]
44. Sachs, L. , & Hedderich, J.
    (2009) Angewandte Statistik. Methodensammlung mit R. 13th Edition. Dordrecht u.a.: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Schiering, R.
    (2002) Klitisierung von Pronomina und Artikelformen. Eine empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel des Ruhrdeutschen. Arbeitspapier, 44. Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. Köln: Universität zu Köln.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Schmitz, K.
    (2006) Zweisprachigkeit im Fokus. Der Erwerb der Verben mit zwei Objekten durch bilingual deutsch-französisch und deutsch-italienisch aufwachsende Kinder. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Schmitz, K. , & Müller, N.
    (2008) Strong and clitic pronouns in monolingual and bilingual acquisition of French and Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 19–41. doi: 10.1017/S1366728907003197
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003197 [Google Scholar]
48. Serratrice, L. , Sorace, A. , & Paoli, S.
    (2004) Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax–pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English–Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(3), 183–205. doi: 10.1017/S1366728904001610
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001610 [Google Scholar]
49. Silva-Corvalán, C.
    (1994) Language contact and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sorace, A.
    (2000) Differential effects in the L1 syntax of L2 near-native speakers. In C. Howell , S. A. Fish , & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.24–47). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Tedeschi, R.
    (2006) The Acquisition of object clitics in Italian: Data from an elicited production task. Annali Online di Ferrara - Lettere, 2, 31–42.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Tsimpli, I.
    (2001) LF-Interpretability and language development: a study of verbal and nominal features in Greek normally developing and SLI children. Brain and Language, 77, 432–448. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2413
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2413 [Google Scholar]
53. Tsimpli, I. , Sorace, A. , Heycock, C. , Filiaci, F. , & Bouba, B.
    (2003) Subjects in L1 attrition: Evidence from Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. In B. Beachley , A. Brown , & F. Conlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.787–797). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Tsimpli, I. , Sorace, A. , Heycock, C. , & Filiaci, F.
    (2004) First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 257–277. doi: 10.1177/13670069040080030601
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069040080030601 [Google Scholar]
55. Valdés, G.
    (2000) Spanish for native speakers: AATSP professional development series handbook for teachers K-16 (vol.1). New York: Harcourt College Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Valdés, G.
    (2005) Bilingualism, heritage language learners, and SLA research: Opportunities lost or seized?The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 410–426. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2005.00314.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00314.x [Google Scholar]