1887
Volume 6, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The current study investigated how language experience impacts phonologically-mediated meaning activation. Monolinguals and bilinguals made living/non-living judgments on English homophones (e.g., beech, beach) while Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Context was manipulated by making the preceding trial either unrelated (e.g., servant → beech) or semantically-related, creating priming. The related context either strengthened (e.g., oak → beech) or diminished (e.g., oak → beach) a homophone’s meaning. In the unrelated context, both groups utilized phonology similarly to access meaning, as evidenced by a later N400 and a larger late positive component (LPC) for homophones than for non-homophonic words. However, when the context primed the incorrect meaning (e.g., oak → beach), only monolinguals exhibited N400 attenuation and delayed LPCs, indicating that they were mistakenly using phonology and context to access meaning and were then required to reanalyze their interpretation. These results provide insight into how oral language experience impacts phonological activation of meaning.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.14026.fri
2016-02-01
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, J.E. , & Holcomb, P. J.
    (1995) Auditory and visual semantic priming using different stimulus onset asynchronies: An event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology, 32, 177–190. doi:10.1111/j.1469‑8986.1995.tb03310.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03310.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, R. H. , Piepenbrock, R. , & van Rijn, H.
    (1993) The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania. Linguistic Data Consortium.
  3. Bentin, S. , McCarthy, G. , & Wood, C. C.
    (1985) Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343–355. doi: 10.1016/0013‑4694(85)90008‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(85)90008-2 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bialystok, E. , & Luk, G.
    (2012) Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 397–401. doi:10.1017/S136672891100040X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891100040X [Google Scholar]
  5. Brysbaert, M. , Van Dyck, G. , & Van de Poel, M.
    (1999) Visual word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence from masked phonological priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 137–148. doi:10.1037/0096‑1523.25.1.137
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.137 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cattell, R. B.
    (1957) Culture fair intelligence test, a measure of “g”: Scale 3, forms A and B (high school pupils and adults of superior intelligence). Savoy, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coltheart, M. , Davelaar, E. , Jonasson, J. T. , & Besner, D.
    ((1977) Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performanceVI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dijkstra, T. , Grainger, J. , & van Heuven, W. J. B.
    (1999) Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496–518. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2654
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2654 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dijkstra, T. , & van Heuven, W. J.B.
    (2002) The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197. doi:10.1017/S1366728902003012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902003012 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunn, L. M. , & Dunn, L. M.
    (1997) Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Friederici, A.D.
    (2002) Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78–84. doi:10.1016/S1364‑6613(00)01839‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01839-8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Friesen, D. C. , & Jared, D.
    (2012) Cross-language phonological activation of meaning: Evidence from category verification. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 145–156. doi:10.1017/S1366728910000489
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000489 [Google Scholar]
  13. Friesen, D. C. , Jared, D. , & Haigh, C.A.
    (2014) Phonological processing dynamics in bilingual word naming. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 179–193. doi: 10.1037/cep0000026
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000026 [Google Scholar]
  14. Frost, R.
    (1998) Towards a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71–99. doi:10.1037/0033‑2909.123.1.71
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.71 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gollan, T. H. , Slattery, T. J. , Goldenberg, D. , van Assche, E. , Duyck, W. , & Rayner, K.
    (2011) Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 186–209. doi:10.1037/a0022256
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022256 [Google Scholar]
  16. Grosjean, F.
    (2012) Bilingual: Life and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Harm, M. W. , & Seidenberg, M. S.
    (2004) Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720. doi:10.1037/0033‑295X.111.3.662
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jared, D. , Levy, B. A. , & Rayner, K.
    (1999) The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: Evidence from proofreading and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 219–264. doi:10.1037/0096‑3445.128.3.219
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.219 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jared, D. , & Seidenberg, M. S.
    (1991) Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358–394. doi:10.1037/0096‑3445.120.4.358
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.120.4.358 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kerkhofs, R. , Dijkstra, T. , Chwilla, D. J. , & de Bruijn, E. R. A.
    (2006) Testing a model for bilingual semantic priming with interlingual homographs: RT and N400 effects. Brain Research, 1068, 120–183. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.087
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.087 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kerswell, L. , Siakaluk, P. D. , Pexman, P. M. , Sears, C. R. , & Owen, W. J.
    (2007) Homophone effects in visual word recognition depend on homophone type and task demands. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 322–327. doi:10.1037/cjep2007032
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cjep2007032 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kotz, S. A.
    (2001) Neurolinguistic evidence for bilingual language representation: a comparison of reaction times and event related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 143–154. doi:10.1017/S1366728901000244
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728901000244 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lau, E. F. , Phillips, C. , & Poeppel, D.
    (2008) A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature, 9, 920–933. doi:10.1038/nrn2532
    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2532 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lehtonen, M. , Hultén, A. , Rodríguez-Fornells, A. , Cunillera, T. , Tuomainen, J. , & Laine, M.
    (2012) Differences in word recognition between early bilinguals and monolinguals: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1362–1371. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.021 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lemhöfer, K. , Dijkstra, T. , Schriefers, H. , Baayen, R. H. , Grainger, J. , & Zwitserlood, P.
    (2008) Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 12–31. doi:10.1037/0278‑7393.34.1.12
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.12 [Google Scholar]
  26. Luk, G. , & Bialystok, E.
    (2013) Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between langauge proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 605–621. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.795574
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.795574 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lukatela, G. , & Turvey, M. T.
    (1994) Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107–128. doi:10.1037/0096‑3445.123.2.107
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.123.2.107 [Google Scholar]
  28. Makeig, S. , Bell, A. J. , Jung, T. P. , & Sejnowski, T.J.
    (1996) Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. Advances in Neural Information Processing systems, 8, 145–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mennes, M. , Wouters, H. , Vanrumste, B. , Lagae, L. , & Stiers, P.
    (2010) Validation of ICA as a tool to remove eye movement artifact from EEG/ERP. Psychophysiology, 47, 1142–1150. doi:10.1111/j.1469‑8986.2010.01015.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01015.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Montrul, S.
    (2012) Is the heritage language like a second language?EUROSLA Yearbook, 12, 1–29. doi: 10.1075/eurosla.12.03mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.12.03mon [Google Scholar]
  31. Newman, R. L. , & Connolly, J. F.
    (2004) Determining the role of phonology in silent reading using event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 94–105. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.05.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  32. Newman, R. L. , Jared, D. , & Haigh, C. A.
    (2012) Does phonology play a role when skilled readers read high-frequency words?Evidence from ERPs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1361–1384. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.603932
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.603932 [Google Scholar]
  33. Niznikiewicz, M. , & Squires, N. K.
    (1996) Phonological processing and the role of strategy in silent reading: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Brain and Language, 52, 342–364. doi:10.1006/brln.1996.0016
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0016 [Google Scholar]
  34. O’Brien, B. A. , van Orden, G. C. , & Pennington, B. F.
    (2013) Do dyslexics misread a ROWS for a ROSE?Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 381–402. doi:10.1007/s11145‑012‑9373‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9373-8 [Google Scholar]
  35. Osterhout, L. , & Holcomb, P. J.
    (1992) Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806. doi:10.1016/0749‑596X(92)90
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pexman, P. M. , Lupker, S. J. , & Jared, D.
    (2001) Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 139–156. doi:10.1037/0278‑7393.27.1.139
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.139 [Google Scholar]
  37. Phillips, N.A. , Segalowitz, N. , O’Brien, I. , & Yamasaki, N.
    (2004) Semantic priming in a first and second language: Evidence from reaction time variability and event-related brain potentials. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 237–262. doi:10.1016/S0911‑6044(03)00055‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(03)00055-1 [Google Scholar]
  38. Polinsky, M. & Kagan, O.
    (2007) Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1/5, 368–395. doi:10.1111/j.1749‑818x.2007.00022.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00022.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Savill, N. , Lindell, A. , Booth, A. , West, G. , & Thierry, G.
    (2011) Literate humans sound out words during silent reading. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 22, 116–120. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e328342ed27
    https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328342ed27 [Google Scholar]
  40. Seidenberg, M. S. , & McClelland, J. L.
    (1989) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.96.4.523
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523 [Google Scholar]
  41. Share, D. L.
    (1995) Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010‑0277(94)00645‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 [Google Scholar]
  42. Taft, M. & van Graan, F.
    (1998) Phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203–224. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2538
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2538 [Google Scholar]
  43. Thierry, G. & Wu, Y. J.
    (2007) Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. PNAS, 104, 12530–12535. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609927104
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609927104 [Google Scholar]
  44. Unsworth, S. J. , & Pexman, P.
    (2003) The impact of reader skill on phonological processing in visual word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 56, 63–81. doi:10.1080/02724980244000206
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000206 [Google Scholar]
  45. van Orden, G. C.
    (1987) A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181–198. doi:10.3758/BF03197716
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197716 [Google Scholar]
  46. van Orden, G. C. , Johnston, J. C. , & Hale, B. L.
    (1988) Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371–386. doi:10.1037/0278‑7393.14.3.371
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  47. Von Studnitz, R. E. , & Green, D.
    (2002) Interlingual homograph interference in German-English bilinguals: Its modulation and locus of control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 1–23. doi:10.1017/S1366728902000111
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902000111 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ziegler, J. C. , Benraïss, A. , & Besson, M.
    (1999) From print to meaning: An electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing meaning. Psychophysiology, 36, 775–785. doi:10.1017/S0048577299980952
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577299980952 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.14026.fri
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.14026.fri
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bilingualism , Homophones , Phonology , Semantics and Visual Word Recognition
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error