1887
Volume 8, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to investigate the acoustic correlates of focus in late and simultaneous bilinguals of Hindi and Indian English (IE). The main acoustic correlates of focus in American/British English are duration, amplitude and F0 and in Hindi are duration, F0 excursion and post-focal pitch compression. In the present study, I look at duration, RMS amplitude and F0 excursion in broad focus, narrow focus and post-focus declarative present tense, past tense and perfect aspect (both transitive and intransitive verbs) Hindi and IE sentences, to explore if there are any differences in the two bilingual groups and to understand the acoustic correlates of focus in IE and Hindi.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.15009.pur
2016-07-26
2019-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arvaniti, A. and M. Baltazani
    1999 Greek ToBI. Paper presented atthe 14th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences Satellite Meeting.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, R. H. , Davidson, D. J. , Bates, D. M.
    2008 Mixed-effects Modeling with Crossed Random Effects for Subjects and Items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412 doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  3. Beckman, M. E. , and Pierrehumbert, J. B.
    1986 Intonational Structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–309. doi: 10.1017/S095267570000066X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000066X [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatt, R. M.
    2000 Optimal Expressions in Indian English. English Language and Linguistics, 4.1. 69–95. doi: 10.1017/S1360674300000149
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674300000149 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bialystok, E. , and Hakuta, K.
    1994 In Other Words: The Psychology and Science of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Basic Books.
  6. BirdSong, D. and Molis, M.
    2001 On the Evidence for Maturational Constraints in Second Language Acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language44: 235–249. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2750
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2750 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boersma, P. and Weenink, D.
    2012 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Version 5.3.35) [Computer program]. Fromwww.praat.org/
  8. Botinis, A. , Fourakis, M. , Gawronska, B.
    1999 Focus Identification in English, Greek and Swedish. Proceedings of the 14th international Congress of Phonetic SciencesSan Francisco. 1557–1560.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cole, J. Hualde, J. I. , Blasingame, M. Yoonsook Mo
    2010 Shifting Chicago vowels: prosody and sound change. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010. Chicago, USA.
  10. Cooper, W. J. , Eady, S. R. and Mueller, P. R.
    1985 Acoustical Aspects of Contrastive Stress in question-answer contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America77: 2142–2155. doi: 10.1121/1.392372
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392372 [Google Scholar]
  11. Crystal, D.
    1997English as a Global Language. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. D’Imperio, M.
    1997 Breadth of Focus, Modality and Prominence Perception in Neopolitan Italian. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics50: 19–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dohen, M. and Loevenbruck H.
    2004 Pre-focal Rephrasing, Focal Enhancement and Post-focal Deaccentuation in French”, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 1313–1316, Jeju, Korea.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dupoux, E. , Peperkamp, S. Sebastián-Gallés, N.
    2009 Limits on Bilingualism Revisited: Stress ‘deafness’ in Simultaneous French–Spanish Bilinguals. Cognition.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dyrud L. O.
    2001 Hindi-Urdu: Stress Accent or Non-stress Accent?M.A. Thesis. University of North Dakota.
  16. Erickson and I. Lehiste
    1995 Contrastive Emphasis in Elicited Dialogue: Durational Compensation. Proc. 13th ICPhS (Stockholm, Sweden), vol.4, 352–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Estebas-Vilaplana, E.
    2000The Use and Realisation of Accentual Focus in Central Catalan with a Comparison to English. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University College, London, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Féry, C. and Kügler, F.
    2008 Pitch Accent Scaling on Given, New and Focused Constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics36, 680–703. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  19. Flege, J. , Schirru, C. , & MacKay, I.
    2003 Interaction Between the Native and Second Language Phonetic Subsystems. Speech Communication, 40, 467–491. doi: 10.1016/S0167‑6393(02)00128‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00128-0 [Google Scholar]
  20. Frota, S.
    1993 On the Prosody of Focus in European Portuguese. Proceedings of the Workshop on Phonology. Lisboa: APL. 45–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fry, D. B.
    1958 Experiments in the Perception of Stress. Language and Speech27:765–768.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Garcia-Lecumberri, M. L.
    1995 Intonational Signaling of Information Structure in English and in Spanish: A Comparative study. Ph D dissertation. University College London.
  23. Gay, T.
    1978 Physiological and Acoustic Correlates of Perceived Stress. Language and Speech21: 347–353.10.1177/002383097802100409
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097802100409 [Google Scholar]
  24. Genzel, S. and Kügler, F.
    2010 Phonetic Implementation of Focal Prominence in Hindi. Speech Prosody Conference proceeding.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Government of India
    Government of India 2002b India 2002: A Reference Manual. New Delhi: Ministry of. Information and Broadcasting, Publications Division.
  26. Gussenhoven, C.
    1983 Focus, Mode and the Nucleus. Journal of Linguistics19, 377–417. Reprinted in Gussenhoven (1984). doi: 10.1017/S0022226700007799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700007799 [Google Scholar]
  27. Guion, S. G.
    2003 The Vowel System of Quichua-Spanish Bilinguals: Age of acquisition effects on the mutual influence of the first and second language, Phonetica60, 98–128. doi: 10.1159/000071449
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000071449 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hamers, J. and Blanc, M.
    2000Bilinguality and Bilingualism. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511605796
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605796 [Google Scholar]
  29. Harnsberger, J. and Jasmeet J.
    1996 Pitch Range and Focus in Hindi. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America99:2493. doi: 10.1121/1.415628
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.415628 [Google Scholar]
  30. Harnsberger J.
    1994 Towards an Intonational Phonology of Hindi. Unpublished manuscript. www.personal.umich.edu/~jharns/hindi.html
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jenkins, J.
    2003World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnson, J. , & Newport, E.
    1989 Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning: The Influence of Maturational State on the Acquisition of English as a Second Language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90003‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kachru, B. B.
    2005Asian Englishes: Beyond the Cathatnon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kang, K.-H. & Guion
    2006 Phonological Systems in Bilinguals: Age of Learning Effects on the Stop Consonant Systems of Korean-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America119, 1672–1683. doi: 10.1121/1.2166607
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2166607 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ladd, D. R.
    1996Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee, Y.-C. , Xu, Y.
    2010 Phonetic Realization of Contrastive Focus in Korean. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago, 100033, 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lenneberg, E. H.
    1967Biological Foundation of Language. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lyon, J.
    1996Becoming Bilingual: Language Acquisition in a Bilingual Community, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, England; Philadelphia, PA.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Maxwell, O. , Fletcher, J.
    2009 Acoustic and durational properties of Indian English vowels. World Englishes 2009; 28: 52–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Maxwell, O.
    2014 The Intonational Phonology of Indian English: An Autosegmental-Metrical Analysis Based on Bengali and Kannada English. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne, Australia.
  41. McGory, J. T.
    1997 Acquisition of Intonational Prominence in English by Seoul Korean and Mandarin Chinese speakers, Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University.
  42. Ménard, L. , Loevenbruck, H. and Savariaux, C.
    2006 Articulatory and Acoustic Correlates of Contrastive Focus in French Children and Adults. InSpeech Production: Models, Phonetic Processes and Techniques, J. Harrington and M. Tabain (Eds.) 227–251.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Mixdorff, H.
    2004 Quantitative Tone and Intonation Modeling Across Languages. Proceedings of International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages: With Emphasis on Tone LanguagesBeijing, 137–142.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Moore, R. R.
    1965A Study of Hindi Intonation. University of Michigan. (Unpublished dissertation).
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Moon, R.
    2002A Comparison of the Acoustic Correlates of Focus in Indian English and American English. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. O’Rourke, E.
    2005 Intonation and Language Contact: A Case Study of Two Varieties of Peruvian Spanish, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  47. Patil, U. , Kentner, G. , Gollrad, A. , Kügler, F. , Féry, C. , Vasishth, S.
    2008 Focus, Word order, and Intonation in Hindi. Journal of South Asian Linguistics1, 53–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Peltola, M.S. , Tamminen, H. , Lehtola, H. , Aaltonen, O.
    2007 Balanced bilinguals have one Intertwined Phonological System. 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 6–10 August 2007, 1865–1868.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Penfield, W. and L. Roberts
    1959Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Pickering, L. and Wiltshire, C.
    2000 Pitch accent in Indian-English Teaching Discourse. World Englishes19, 173–83. doi: 10.1111/1467‑971X.00167
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00167 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2000 Pitch accent in Indian English TAs’ Teaching Discourse. World Englishes, 19:173–183. doi: 10.1111/1467‑971X.00167
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00167 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pierrehumbert, J. B.
    1980 The Phonetics and Phonology of English Intonation. PhD thesis, MIT. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
  53. Platt, J , Webber, H. and Ho M. L.
    1984 The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  54. Puri, V.
    2013 Intonation in Indian English and Hindi late and simultaneous bilinguals. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  55. Rietveld, T , Kerkhoff , Gussenhoven, C.
    2004 Word Prosodic Structure and Vowel Duration in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics32, 349–371. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2003.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2003.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  56. Shosted, R. , Carignan, C. , and Rong, P.
    2012 Managing the Distinctiveness of Phonemic Nasal vowels: Articulatory Evidence from Hindi. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America131(1): 455–465. doi: 10.1121/1.3665998
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3665998 [Google Scholar]
  57. Simonet, M.
    2008Language Contact in Majorca: An Experimental Sociophonetic Approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Singh, R.
    2007 Reflections on English in India and Indian English (Target paper). Presented atthe symposium on English in India and Indian English. Mysore: CIIL.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Sundara, M. , Polka, L. , & Baum, S.
    2006 Production of Coronal Stops by Simultaneous bilingual Adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 97–114. doi: 10.1017/S1366728905002403
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728905002403 [Google Scholar]
  60. Sundara, M. , Polka, L.
    2007 Discrimination of Coronal Stops by Bilingual Adults: The timing and nature of language interaction. Cognition (2007), 10.1016.
    https://doi.org/10.1016 [Google Scholar]
  61. Trudgill, P.
    1995Sociolinguistics. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Toledo, G.
    1989 Senales prosodicas del foco. Revista Argentina de Lingüística5 (1–2): 205–230.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Ueyama, M. and Jun, Sun-Ah
    1998 Focus realization in Japanese English and Korean English Intonation. InHajime Hoji (a cura di), Japanese and Korean Linguistics7. CSLI, Stanford University Press. 629–645.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Vella, A.
    1995 Prosodic Structure and Intonation in Maltese: Influence on Maltese English. Ph D dissertation. Edinburgh University.
  65. Wells, W.
    1986 An Experimental Approach to the Interpretation of Focus in Spoken English. In C. Johns-Lewis (Ed.). Intonation in Discourse. London: Croom Helm. 53–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Wiltshire, C. R. , and Harnsberger, J. D.
    2006 The Influence of Gujarati and Tamil L1s on Indian English: a preliminary study. World Englishes25, 91–104. doi: 10.1111/j.0083‑2919.2006.00448.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0083-2919.2006.00448.x [Google Scholar]
  67. Wiltshire, C. and Moon, R.
    2003 Phonetic Stress in Indian English vs. American English. World Englishes, 22(3), 291–303. doi: 10.1111/1467‑971X.00297
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00297 [Google Scholar]
  68. Xu, Y. and Xu, C. X.
    2005 Phonetic Realization of Focus in English Declarative Intonation. Journal of Phonetics33, 159–197. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  69. Xu, Y.
    2011 Post-focal Compression: Cross Linguistic Distribution and Historical Comparison. ICPhS XVII: Hong Kong, 17–21.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.15009.pur
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.15009.pur
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Focus , late bilinguals and simultaneous
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error