1887
Volume 8, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Yucatec Maya differs from many better-known languages in that it has optional plural marking. In a psycholinguistic study of the production of optional plural marking with college-enrolled speakers of Yucatec Maya, Butler, Jaeger, and Bohnemeyer (2014) found that conceptual number information influences the production of optional plural marking. Since the participants in the Butler et al. (2014) study are not necessarily representative of speakers of Yucatec Maya, we examine the effects of conceptual number information, via the manipulation of set size, while factoring in the effects of age, education and language use variables on the production of optional plural morphology among bilingual speakers of Yucatec Maya and Spanish speaking in Yucatec Maya. In addition to finding effects of conceptual information, we found that education, but not age, significantly influences the production of plural morphology in Yucatec Maya. Participants with higher levels of education were more sensitive to conceptual number information.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.15037.but
2017-02-07
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acuña-Fariña, J. C.
    (2009) The linguistics and psycholinguistics of agreement: A tutorial overview. Lingua, 119, 389–424. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, R. H. , Davidson, D. J. , & Bates, D. M.
    (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects mixed effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barner, D. , Lui, T. , & Zapf, J.
    (2012) Is two a plural marker in early child language?Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 10–17. doi: 10.1037/a0025283
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025283 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D. , Maechler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S.
    (2015a) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, ArXiv e-print. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2015b) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using eigen and s4 (R Package version 1.1–9).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Berg, T.
    (1998) The resolution of number agreement conflicts in English and German agreement patterns. Linguistics, 36, 41–70. doi: 10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.41
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.41 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blaha Pfeiler, B. , & Carrillo Carreón, C.
    (2001) La adquisición del maya yucateco: el número. In C. R. y Lourdes de León Pasquel (Ed.), La adquisición de la lengua materna. Espaüol, lenguas Mayas, Euskera (pp.75–97). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bock, J. K. , & Cutting, J. C.
    (1992) Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 99–127. doi: 10.1016/0749‑596X(92)90007‑K
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90007-K [Google Scholar]
  9. Bock, J. K. , & Eberhard, K. M.
    (1993) Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 57–99. doi: 10.1080/01690969308406949
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308406949 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bock, J. K. , & Levelt, W. J. M.
    (1994) Language production: grammatical encoding. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp.945–984). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bock, J. K. , & Miller, C. A.
    (1991) Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(91)90003‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bohnemeyer, J.
    (2002) The grammar of time reference in Yukatek Maya. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2009) Linking without grammatical relations in Yucatec: Alignment, extraction and control. In Y. Nishina , Y. M. Shin , S. Skopeteas , E. Verhoeven , & J. Helmbrecht (Eds.), Issues in functional-typological linguistics and language theory: A festschrift for Christian Lehmann on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp.185–214). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bohnemeyer, J. , Butler, L. K. , & Jaeger, T. F.
    (2015) Head-marking and agreement: Evidence from Yucatec Maya. In J. Fleischhauer , A. Latrouite , & R. Osswald (Eds.), Explorations of the syntax-semantics interface. Düselforf: Düselforf University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Borer, H.
    (2005) Structuring Sense. In Name Only (Vol.I). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brainshark, Inc.
    Brainshark, Inc. (2014) Slideshark. https://www.slideshark.com/.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Branigan, H. , Pickering, M. , & Tanaka, M.
    (2008) Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua, 118(2), 172–189. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Breslow, N. E. , & Clayton, D. G.
    (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(421), 9–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bricker, V. R.
    (1981) The source of the ergative split in Yucatec Maya. Journal of Mayan Linguistics, 2, 83–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Brown-Schmidt, S. , & Konopka, A. E.
    (2008) Little houses and casas pequeüas: Message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish. Cognition, 109(2), 274–280. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.011 [Google Scholar]
  21. Butler, L. K.
    (2011) The morphosyntax and processing of number marking in Yucatec Maya (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Arizona.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2012) Crosslinguistic and experimental evidence for non-Number plurals. Linguistic Variation, 12(1), 27–56. doi: 10.1075/lv.12.1.02but
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.1.02but [Google Scholar]
  23. Butler, L. K. , Jaeger, T. F. , & Bohnemeyer, J.
    (2014) Syntactic constraints and production preferences for optional plural marking in Yucatec Maya. In A. Machicao y Priemer , A. Nolda , & A. Sioupi (Eds.), Zwischen kern und peripherie (Studia Grammatica) (Vol.75). Berlin: Akadmie-Verlag. doi: 10.1524/9783050065335.181
    https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050065335.181 [Google Scholar]
  24. CONAFE
    CONAFE (2000) Escuela y comunidades originarias en México. Consejo Nacional del Fomento Educativo. Mexico.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Corbett, G. G.
    (2000) Number. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139164344
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164344 [Google Scholar]
  26. den Dikken, M.
    (2001) “Pluringulars”, pronouns and quirky agreement. The Linguistic Review, 18, 19–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Desmet, T. , & Duyck, W.
    (2007) Bilingual language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1/3, 168–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00008.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00008.x [Google Scholar]
  28. Eberhard, K. M.
    (1999) The accessibility of conceptual number to the processes of subject-verb agreement in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 560–578. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2662
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2662 [Google Scholar]
  29. England, N.
    (2011) Plurality agreement in some Eastern Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 77(3), 397–412. doi: 10.1086/660974
    https://doi.org/10.1086/660974 [Google Scholar]
  30. Foote, R. , & Bock, K.
    (2012) The role of morphology in subject–verb number agreement: A comparison of Mexican and Dominican Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(3), 429–461. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.550166
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.550166 [Google Scholar]
  31. Francis, W. N.
    (1986) Proximity concord in English. Journal of English Linguistics, 19, 309–317. doi: 10.1177/007542428601900212
    https://doi.org/10.1177/007542428601900212 [Google Scholar]
  32. Garrett, M. F.
    (1980) Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (Vol.1, pp.177–220). London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gillespie, M. , & Pearlmutter, N.
    (2011) Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject-verb agreement production. Cognition, 118(377–397). doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  34. Haspelmath, M.
    (2013) Occurrence of nominal plurality. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Henrich, J. , Heine, S. J. , & Norenzayan, A.
    (2010) The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X [Google Scholar]
  36. Hoshino, N. , Dussias, P. E. , & Kroll, J. F.
    (2010) Processing subject-verb agreement in a second language depends on proficiency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(2), 87–98. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990034 [Google Scholar]
  37. INEGI
    INEGI (2010) Censo general de población y vivienda. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. Mexico.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Jaeger, T. F.
    (2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jaeger, T. F. , & Norcliffe, E. J.
    (2009) The cross-linguistic study of sentence production. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2009.00147.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00147.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Jespersen, O.
    (1924) The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kaan, E.
    (2002) Investigating the effects of distance and number interference in processing subject-verb dependencies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 165–193. doi: 10.1023/A:1014978917769
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014978917769 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kempen, G. , & Harbusch, K.
    (2004) A corpus study into word order variation in German subordinate clauses : Animacy affects linearization independently of grammatical function assignment. In T. Pechmann & C. Habel (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production (pp.173–181). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110894028.173
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894028.173 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kempen, G. , & Hoenkamp, E.
    (1987) An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11(2), 201–258. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1102_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1102_5 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kimball, J. , & Aissen, J.
    (1971) I think, you think, he think. Linguistic Inquiry, 2, 241–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kreiner, H. , Garrod, S. , & Sturt, P.
    (2013) Number agreement in sentence comprehension: the relationship between grammatical and conceptual factors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 829–874. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2012.667567
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.667567 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lanter, J. A. , & Basche, R. A.
    (2014) Effect of number and similarity on children’s plural comprehension. First Language, 34, 519–536. doi: 10.1177/0142723714560177
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723714560177 [Google Scholar]
  47. Levelt, W. J. M.
    (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Lorimor, H. , Bock, J. K. , Zalkind, E. , Sheyman, A. , & Beard, R.
    (2008) Agreement and attraction in Russian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(6), 769–799. doi: 10.1080/01690960701774182
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701774182 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lucy, J. A.
    (1992) Grammatical categories and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620713
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620713 [Google Scholar]
  50. Nicol, J. , Forster, K. , & Veres, C.
    (1997) Subject-verb agreement processes in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 569–587. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.2497
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2497 [Google Scholar]
  51. Nicol, J. , & Greth, D.
    (2003) Production of subject-verb agreement in spanish as a second language. Experimental Psychology, 50, 196–203. doi: 10.1026//1617‑3169.50.3.196
    https://doi.org/10.1026//1617-3169.50.3.196 [Google Scholar]
  52. Nicol, J. , Teller, M. , & Greth, D.
    (2001) Production of verb agreement in monolingual, bilingual and second language speakers. In J. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Billingual language processing (pp.117–133). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Norcliffe, E.
    (2009) Head marking in usage and grammar. A study of variation and change in Yucatec Maya (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Norcliffe, E. , & Jaeger, T. F.
    (2014) Predciting head-marking variability in Yucatec Maya relative clause production. Language and Cognition, First View, 1–39. doi: 10.1017/langcog.2014.39
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.39 [Google Scholar]
  55. Norcliffe, E. , Konopka, A. E. , Brown, P. , & Levinson, S. C.
    (2015) Word order affects the time-course of sentence formulation in Tzeltal. The cross-linguistic study of language understanding and production, Special Issue of Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(9), 1187–1208.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Osterhout, L. , & Mobley, L.
    (1995) Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739–773. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1033
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1033 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pearlmutter, N.
    (2000) Linear versus hierarchical agreement feature processing in comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 89–98. doi: 10.1023/A:1005128624716
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005128624716 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pearlmutter, N. , Garnsey, S. M. , & Bock, J. K.
    (1999) Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 427–456. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2653
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2653 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pfeiler, B.
    (1998) Acquisition of number in Yucatec Maya. In S. Gillis (Ed.), Studies in the acquisition of number and diminutive marking (Vol.95, pp.77–95). Universiteit Antwerpen: Antwerp Papers in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (2001) Acerca de la adquisición del número en el maya yucateco. InPaper presented atthe I seminario sobre adquisición de la lengua indígena. San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (2009) The acquisition of numeral classifiers and optional plural marking in Yucatec Maya. In U. Stephany & M. Voiekova (Eds.), The acquisition of number and case from a typological perspective. Studies on language acquisition [SOLA] (pp.91–110). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. (2014) Maya and Spanish in Yucatán: An example of continuity and change. In S. S. Mufwene (Ed.), Iberian imerialism and language evolution in Latin America (pp.205–224). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226125671.003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226125671.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  63. Pfeiler, B. , & Zámišová, L
    (2006) Bilingual education: Strategy for language maintenance or shift of Yucatec Maya?In M. Hidalgo (Ed.), Mexican indigenous languages at the dawn of the twenty-first century (pp.281–300). New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197679.3.294
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197679.3.294 [Google Scholar]
  64. Quirk, R. , Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. , & Svartik, J.
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Tech. Rep.). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Sauppe, S. , Norcliffe, E. , Konopka, A. E. , Van Valin, R. D. J. , & Levinson, S. C.
    (2013) Dependencies first: Eye tracking evidence from sentence production in Tagalog. InProceedings of the35th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.1265–1270). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Staub, A.
    (2009) On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 308–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2010) Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction. Cognition, 114(447–454). doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  69. Thornton, R. , & MacDonald, M. C.
    (2003) Plausibility and grammatical agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 740–759. doi: 10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00003‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00003-2 [Google Scholar]
  70. Van Hell, J. , & Mensies, M.
    (2004) Subject-verb agreement in beginning L2 learners and fluent bilinguals. Minneapolis, MN: Paper presented at the45th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society of America. doi: 10.1037/e537052012‑198
    https://doi.org/10.1037/e537052012-198 [Google Scholar]
  71. Vigliocco, G. , Butterworth, B. , & Garrett, M. F.
    (1996) Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition, 61(3), 261–98. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(96)00713‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00713-5 [Google Scholar]
  72. Vigliocco, G. , Butterworth, B. , & Semenza, C.
    (1995) Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 186–215. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1009
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1009 [Google Scholar]
  73. Vigliocco, G. , Hartsuiker, R. J. , Jarema, G. , & Kolk, H. H.
    (1996) One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 407–442. doi: 10.1080/016909696387169
    https://doi.org/10.1080/016909696387169 [Google Scholar]
  74. Vigliocco, G. , & Nicol, J.
    (1998) Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production. Is proximity concord syntactic or linear?Cognition, 68, 13–29. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(98)00041‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00041-9 [Google Scholar]
  75. Vigliocco, G. , & Zilli, T.
    (1999) Syntactic accuracy in sentence production: Gender disagreement in Italian language impaired and unimpaired speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 623–648. doi: 10.1023/A:1023268911312
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023268911312 [Google Scholar]
  76. Wagers, M. W. , Lau, E. F. , & Philips, C.
    (2009) Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 206–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  77. Wiltschko, M.
    (2008) The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, 639–694. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑008‑9046‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9046-0 [Google Scholar]
  78. Zapf, J. A. , & Smith, L. B.
    (2008) Meaning matters in children’s plural productions. Cognition, 108, 466–476. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.008 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.15037.but
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.15037.but
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): language production , plural and Yucatec Maya
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error