Investigating grammatical processing in bilinguals

References

1. Anderson, S. R.
   (1992) A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511586262
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586262 [Google Scholar]
2. Abutalebi, J. , & Green, D. W.
   (in press). Neuroimaging of language control in bilinguals: neural adaptation and reserve. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baayen, R. H.
   (2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
4. Bialystok, E.
   (2009) Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 3–11. doi: 10.1017/S1366728908003477
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003477 [Google Scholar]
5. Birdsong, D.
   (2005) Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp.109–127). New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Birdsong, D.
   (2009) Age and the end state of second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp.401–424). Bingley: Emerald.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bozic, M. , Tyler, L. K. , Su, L. , Wingfield, C. , & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
   (2013) Neurobiological systems for lexical representation and analysis in English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1678–1691. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00420
   https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00420 [Google Scholar]
8. Dekydtspotter, L. , & Miller, A. K.
   (2013) Inhibitive and facilitative priming induced by traces in the processing of wh-dependencies in a second language. Second Language Research, 29, 345–372. doi: 10.1177/0267658312467030
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312467030 [Google Scholar]
9. Diependaele, K. , Duñabeitia, J. A. , Morris, J. , Keuleers, E.
   (2011) Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003 [Google Scholar]
10. Faust, M. E. , Balota, D. A. , Spieler, D. H. , & Ferraro, F. R.
    (1999) Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.125.6.777
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777 [Google Scholar]
11. Feldman, L. B. , O’Connor, P. A. , & Moscoso Del Prado Martín, F.
    (2009) Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 684–691. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.684
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.684 [Google Scholar]
12. Frost, R. , Deutsch, A. , Gilboa, O. , Tannenbaum, M. , Marslen-Wilson, W.
    (2000) Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1277–1288. doi: 10.3758/BF03211828
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211828 [Google Scholar]
13. Goldrick, M. , Putnam, M. , & Schwarz, L.
    (in press). Coactivation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hakuta, K. , Bialystok, E. , & Wiley, E.
    (2003) Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14, 31–38. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9280.01415
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01415 [Google Scholar]
15. Hartsuiker, R.
    (2015) Why it is pointless to ask under which specific circumstances the bilingual advantage occurs. Cortex73, 336–337. 15 doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.018 [Google Scholar]
16. Heyer, V. , & Clahsen, H.
    (2015) Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal: Dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 543–550. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000662
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000662 [Google Scholar]
17. Jacob, G. , Heyer, V. , & Veríssimo, J.
    (2016) Aiming at the same target: A masked priming study directly comparing derivation and inflection in the second language. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Johnson, J. S. , Newport, E. L.
    (1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90003‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 [Google Scholar]
19. Juffs, A. & Rodriguez, G. A.
    (2015) Second language sentence processing. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kırkıcı, B. , & Clahsen, H.
    (2013) Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 776–794. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000648
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000648 [Google Scholar]
21. Liang, L. , & Chen, B.
    (2014) Processing morphologically complex words in second-language learners: The effect of proficiency. Acta Psychologica, 150, 69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.009 [Google Scholar]
22. Linck, J. A. , Hoshino, N. , & Kroll, J. F.
    (2008) Cross-language lexical processes and inhibitory control. Mental Lexicon, 3, 349–374. doi:10.1075/ml.3.3.06lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.3.3.06lin [Google Scholar]
23. Luk, G. , de Sa, E. , & Bialystok, E.
    (2011) Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 588–595. doi:10.1017/S1366728911000010.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000010 [Google Scholar]
24. Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
    (2007) Morphological processes in language comprehension. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp.175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. , Bozic, M. , & Randall, B.
    (2008) Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 394–421. doi: 10.1080/01690960701588004
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701588004 [Google Scholar]
26. Pelham, S. D. , & Abrams, L.
    (2013) Cognitive advantages and disadvantages in early and late bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 313–325.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pinker, S.
    (1994) The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Morrow. doi: 10.1037/e412952005‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1037/e412952005-009 [Google Scholar]
28. Raveh, M. , and Rueckl, J. G.
    (2000) Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: Long-term morphological priming in fragment completion and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 103–119. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2673
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2673 [Google Scholar]
29. Rastle, K. , Davis, M. H. , & New, B.
    (2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742 [Google Scholar]
30. Silva, R. & Clahsen, H.
    (2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260. doi: 10.1017/S1366728908003404
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003404 [Google Scholar]
31. Stanners, R. F. , Neisser, J. J. , Hernon, W. P. , & Hall, R.
    (1979) Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399–412. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(79)90219‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90219-6 [Google Scholar]
32. Stump, G.
    (2001) Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Valian, V.
    (2015) Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 3–24. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000522
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000522 [Google Scholar]
34. Vanhove, J.
    (2013) The critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition: A statistical critique and a reanalysis. PLoS ONE, 8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069172
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069172 [Google Scholar]
35. Veríssimo, J. & Clahsen, H.
    (2009) Morphological priming by itself: A study of Portuguese conjugations. Cognition, 112, 187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.003 [Google Scholar]
36. Veríssimo, J. , Heyer, V. , Jacob, G. , & Clahsen, H.
    (2016) Evidence for a sensitive period Selective effects of age of acquisition on morphological priming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Voga, M. , Anastassiadis-Syméonidis, A. , & Giraudo, H.
    (2014) Does morphology play a role in L2 processing? Two masked priming experiments with Greek speakers of ESL. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 37, 338–352. doi: 10.1075/li.37.2.10vog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.37.2.10vog [Google Scholar]
38. Xu, Y.
    (2014) Processing relative clauses in Chinese as a second language. Second Language Research, 30, 439–461. doi: 10.1177/0267658313511485
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313511485 [Google Scholar]