1887
Volume 6, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In this article we discuss methods for investigating grammatical processing in bilinguals. We will present a methodological approach that relies on: (i) linguistic theory (in our case, morphology) for the construction of experimental materials; (ii) a design that allows for direct (within-experiment, within-participant, and within-item) comparisons of the critical conditions; and (iii) data analysis techniques that make both linear and non-linear gradient effects visible. We review recent studies of masked morphological priming in bilinguals in which the application of these methodological principles revealed highly selective interactions of age of acquisition (and the native/non-native contrast) with the linguistic distinction between inflection and derivation. We believe that such considerations are not only relevant for grammatical processing experiments, but also for studying bilingualism, and its potential cognitive advantages, more generally.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.15039.cla
2016-07-13
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, S. R.
    (1992) A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511586262
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586262 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abutalebi, J. , & Green, D. W.
    (in press). Neuroimaging of language control in bilinguals: neural adaptation and reserve. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. H.
    (2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bialystok, E.
    (2009) Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 3–11. doi: 10.1017/S1366728908003477
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003477 [Google Scholar]
  5. Birdsong, D.
    (2005) Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp.109–127). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2009) Age and the end state of second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp.401–424). Bingley: Emerald.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bozic, M. , Tyler, L. K. , Su, L. , Wingfield, C. , & Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
    (2013) Neurobiological systems for lexical representation and analysis in English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1678–1691. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00420
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00420 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dekydtspotter, L. , & Miller, A. K.
    (2013) Inhibitive and facilitative priming induced by traces in the processing of wh-dependencies in a second language. Second Language Research, 29, 345–372. doi: 10.1177/0267658312467030
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312467030 [Google Scholar]
  9. Diependaele, K. , Duñabeitia, J. A. , Morris, J. , Keuleers, E.
    (2011) Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Faust, M. E. , Balota, D. A. , Spieler, D. H. , & Ferraro, F. R.
    (1999) Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.125.6.777
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.777 [Google Scholar]
  11. Feldman, L. B. , O’Connor, P. A. , & Moscoso Del Prado Martín, F.
    (2009) Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 684–691. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.684
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.684 [Google Scholar]
  12. Frost, R. , Deutsch, A. , Gilboa, O. , Tannenbaum, M. , Marslen-Wilson, W.
    (2000) Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1277–1288. doi: 10.3758/BF03211828
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211828 [Google Scholar]
  13. Goldrick, M. , Putnam, M. , & Schwarz, L.
    (in press). Coactivation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hakuta, K. , Bialystok, E. , & Wiley, E.
    (2003) Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14, 31–38. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9280.01415
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01415 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hartsuiker, R.
    (2015) Why it is pointless to ask under which specific circumstances the bilingual advantage occurs. Cortex73, 336–337. 15 doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.018 [Google Scholar]
  16. Heyer, V. , & Clahsen, H.
    (2015) Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal: Dissecting formal overlap from morphological priming in the processing of derived words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 543–550. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000662
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000662 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jacob, G. , Heyer, V. , & Veríssimo, J.
    (2016) Aiming at the same target: A masked priming study directly comparing derivation and inflection in the second language. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson, J. S. , Newport, E. L.
    (1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90003‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. Juffs, A. & Rodriguez, G. A.
    (2015) Second language sentence processing. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kırkıcı, B. , & Clahsen, H.
    (2013) Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 776–794. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000648
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000648 [Google Scholar]
  21. Liang, L. , & Chen, B.
    (2014) Processing morphologically complex words in second-language learners: The effect of proficiency. Acta Psychologica, 150, 69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.009 [Google Scholar]
  22. Linck, J. A. , Hoshino, N. , & Kroll, J. F.
    (2008) Cross-language lexical processes and inhibitory control. Mental Lexicon, 3, 349–374. doi:10.1075/ml.3.3.06lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.3.3.06lin [Google Scholar]
  23. Luk, G. , de Sa, E. , & Bialystok, E.
    (2011) Is there a relation between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 588–595. doi:10.1017/S1366728911000010.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000010 [Google Scholar]
  24. Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
    (2007) Morphological processes in language comprehension. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp.175–193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. , Bozic, M. , & Randall, B.
    (2008) Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 394–421. doi: 10.1080/01690960701588004
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701588004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pelham, S. D. , & Abrams, L.
    (2013) Cognitive advantages and disadvantages in early and late bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 313–325.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pinker, S.
    (1994) The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Morrow. doi: 10.1037/e412952005‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1037/e412952005-009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Raveh, M. , and Rueckl, J. G.
    (2000) Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: Long-term morphological priming in fragment completion and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 103–119. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2673
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2673 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rastle, K. , Davis, M. H. , & New, B.
    (2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098. doi: 10.3758/BF03196742
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196742 [Google Scholar]
  30. Silva, R. & Clahsen, H.
    (2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260. doi: 10.1017/S1366728908003404
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003404 [Google Scholar]
  31. Stanners, R. F. , Neisser, J. J. , Hernon, W. P. , & Hall, R.
    (1979) Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399–412. doi: 10.1016/S0022‑5371(79)90219‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90219-6 [Google Scholar]
  32. Stump, G.
    (2001) Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Valian, V.
    (2015) Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 3–24. doi: 10.1017/S1366728914000522
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000522 [Google Scholar]
  34. Vanhove, J.
    (2013) The critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition: A statistical critique and a reanalysis. PLoS ONE, 8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069172
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069172 [Google Scholar]
  35. Veríssimo, J. & Clahsen, H.
    (2009) Morphological priming by itself: A study of Portuguese conjugations. Cognition, 112, 187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  36. Veríssimo, J. , Heyer, V. , Jacob, G. , & Clahsen, H.
    (2016) Evidence for a sensitive period Selective effects of age of acquisition on morphological priming. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Voga, M. , Anastassiadis-Syméonidis, A. , & Giraudo, H.
    (2014) Does morphology play a role in L2 processing? Two masked priming experiments with Greek speakers of ESL. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 37, 338–352. doi: 10.1075/li.37.2.10vog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.37.2.10vog [Google Scholar]
  38. Xu, Y.
    (2014) Processing relative clauses in Chinese as a second language. Second Language Research, 30, 439–461. doi: 10.1177/0267658313511485
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313511485 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.15039.cla
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): age of acquisition , critical period , derivation , inflection and Morphological priming
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error