1887
Volume 6, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Studies across the lifespan have revealed modifications in executive control (EC) from bilingualism, but studies of working memory (WM), a key aspect of EC, have produced varied results. Healthy older ( = 71.0 years) and younger participants ( = 21.1 years) who were monolingual or bilingual, performed working memory tasks that varied in their demands for EC. Tasks included a star counting task, a flanker task, and a nonverbal recent probe memory task. Bilinguals performed similarly to monolinguals on the star counting task after controlling for differences in vocabulary. Monolinguals were faster than bilinguals on the flanker task with only age group differences significant for the WM manipulation. Bilinguals were faster than monolinguals on the nonverbal recent probe memory task, particularly for the condition that included proactive interference. The interpretation is that better bilingual performance in nonverbal working memory tasks is linked to the need for executive control.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.15056.sul
2016-02-19
2019-08-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adesope, O.O. , Lavin, T. , Thompson, T. , & Ungerleider, C.
    (2010) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Review of Educational Research, 80 (2), 207–245. doi: 10.3102/0034654310368803
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310368803 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bialystok, E.
    (2015) Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child Development Perspectives, 9 (2), 117–121. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12116
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12116 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bialystok, E. , Craik, F.I.M. , Green, D.W. , & Gollan, T.H.
    (2009) Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10, 89–129. doi: 10.1177/1529100610387084
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387084 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bialystok, E. , Craik, F. , & Luk, G.
    (2008) Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34 (4), 859–873. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.34.4.859
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.859 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bialystok, E. , Craik, F. I. M. , Klein, R. , & Viswanathan, M.
    (2004) Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 290–303. doi: 10.1037/0882‑7974.19.2.290
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bialystok, E. , & Feng, X.
    (2009) Language proficiency and executive control in proactive interference: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual children and adults. Brain & Language, 109, 93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bialystok, E. , & Luk, G.
    (2012) Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 397–401. doi: 10.1017/S136672891100040X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891100040X [Google Scholar]
  8. Bialystok, E. , Luk, G. , Peets, K.F. , & Yang, S.
    (2010) Receptive vocabulary differences in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (4), 525–531. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990423
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990423 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bialystok, E. , Poarch, G. J. , Luo, L. , & Craik, F. I. M.
    (2014) Effects of bilingualism and aging on executive function and working memory. Psychology and Aging, 29 (3), 696–705. doi: 10.1037/a0037254.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037254 [Google Scholar]
  10. Das-Smaal, E. , de Jong, P. F. , & Koopmans, J. R.
    (1993) Working memory, attentional regulation and the star counting test. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(6), 815–824. doi: 10.1016/0191‑8869(93)90094‑J
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90094-J [Google Scholar]
  11. Eriksson, J. , Vogel, E.K. , Lansner, A. , Bergström, F. , & Nyberg, L.
    (2015) Neurocognitive architecture of working memory. Neuron, 88 (1), 33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.020 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fernandes, M.A. , Craik, F.I.M. , Bialystok, E. , & Kreuger, S.
    (2007) Effects of bilingualism, aging, and semantic relatedness on memory under divided attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6 (2), 128–141. doi: 10.1037/cjep2007014
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cjep2007014 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gollan, T.H. , Montoya, R.I. , Cera, C.M. , & & Sandoval, T.C.
    (2008) More use almost always means smaller a frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 787–814. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gollan, T.H. , & Silverberg, N.B.
    (2001) Tip-of-the-tongue states in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 63–83. doi: 10.1017/S136672890100013X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890100013X [Google Scholar]
  15. Grundy, J.G. , & Timmer, K.
    (submitted). Bilingualism and working memory capacity: A comprehensive meta-analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hasher, L. , Zacks, R. T. , & May, C. P.
    (1999) Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher and A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. Attention and performance (pp.653–675). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ivanova, I. , & Costa, A.
    (2008) Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production?Acta Psychologica, 127, 277–288. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacoby. L.L.
    (1991) A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30 (5), 513–541. doi: 10.1016/0749‑596X(91)90025‑F
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F [Google Scholar]
  19. Jonides, J. , Marshuetz, C. , Smith, E.E. , Reuter-Lorenz, P.A. , Koeppe, R.A.
    (2000) Age differences in behavior and PET activation reveal differences in interference resolution in verbal working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (1), 188–196. doi: 10.1162/089892900561823
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089892900561823 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jonides, J. , & Nee, D. E.
    (2006) Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 181–193. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.042
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.042 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kroll, J. F. , Dussias, P. E. , Bogulski, C. A. , & Valdes-Kroff, J.
    (2012) Juggling two languages in one mind: What bilinguals tell us about language processing and its consequences for cognition. In B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol.56, pp.229–262). San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Linck, J.A. , Osthus, P. , Koeth, J.T. , & Bunting, M.F.
    (2014) Working memory and second language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–883. doi: 10.3758/s13423‑013‑0565‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu, C.H , & Proctor, R.W.
    (1995) The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207. doi: 10.3758/BF03210959
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210959 [Google Scholar]
  24. Luk, G. & Bialystok, E.
    (2013) Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 605–621. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2013.795574
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.795574 [Google Scholar]
  25. Luo, L. , Craik, F. I. M. , Moreno, S. , & Bialystok, E.
    (2013) Bilingualism interacts with domain in a working memory task: Evidence from aging. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 28–34. doi: 10.1037/a0030875
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030875 [Google Scholar]
  26. May, C. , Hasher, L. , & Kane, M.J.
    (1999) The role of interference in memory span. Memory & Cognition, 27, 759–767. doi: 10.3758/BF03198529
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198529 [Google Scholar]
  27. Oberauer, K. , Süss, H.M. , Schulze, R. , Wilhelm, O. , & Wittman, W.W.
    (2000) Working memory capacity- facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045. doi: 10.1016/S0191‑8869(99)00251‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00251-2 [Google Scholar]
  28. Shipley, W. C. , Gruber, C. P. , Martin, T. A. , & Klein, A. M.
    (2009) Shipley-2 Manual.Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. van Merrienboer, J. , & Sweller, J.
    (2005) Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177. doi: 10.1007/s10648‑005‑3951‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0 [Google Scholar]
  30. Wodniecka, Z. , Craik, F.I.M. , Luo, L. , & Bialystok, E.
    (2010) Does bilingualism help memory? Competing effects of verbal ability and executive control. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13 (5), 575–595. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2010.488287
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2010.488287 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.15056.sul
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.15056.sul
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error