1887
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In a series of five experiments with 31 Korean heritage children, we show that knowledge of case and the ability to use it must be evaluated with careful attention to multiple factors that can influence access to morphological information in the course of comprehension and production. The first two experiments, which compared the canonical SOV pattern with the non-canonical OSV pattern, employed picture-selection comprehension tasks to assess knowledge of case. Poor performance on OSV sentences was mitigated by experimental manipulations that either enhanced the perceptual salience of case or provided felicitous conditions for the use of non-canonical word order. The next three experiments, all involving production tasks, revealed that many children who failed to demonstrate knowledge of case in the comprehension tasks actually produced nominative and accusative case correctly, thereby revealing their knowledge of this morphosyntactic system.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16001.kim
2017-01-13
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bader, M. , & Bayer, J.
    (2006) Case and linking in language comprehension: Evidence from German. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Benmamoun, E. , Montrul, S. , & Polinsky, M.
    (2013) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39 (3–4), 129–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boersma, P. , & Weenink, D.
    (2008) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Amsterdam: Institute of Phonetic Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolonyai, A.
    2007 (In)vulnerable agreement in incomplete bilingual L1 learners. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 3–21. doi: 10.1177/13670069070110010201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069070110010201 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cho, S. W.
    (1981) The acquisition of word order in Korean. MA thesis, the University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Choo, M. , & Kwak, H.-Y.
    (2008) Using Korean. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139168496
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168496 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chung, G. N.
    (1994) Case and its acquisition in Korean. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark, E. , & Hecht, B.
    (1983) Comprehension, production, and language acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 325–349. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.34.020183.001545
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.34.020183.001545 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Groot, C.
    (2005) The grammars of Hungarian outside Hungary from a linguistic-typological perspective. In A. Fenyvesi (Ed.). Hungarian language contact outside Hungary, pp.351–370. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.20.18gro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.20.18gro [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, N.
    (2006) Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164–194. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml015 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fenyvesi, A.
    (2000) The affectedness of the verbal complex in American Hungarian. In A. Fenyvesi & K. Sándor (Eds.) Language contact and the verbal complex of Dutch and Hungarian: Working papers from the 1st Bilingual Language Use Theme Meeting of the Study Centre on Language Contact, pp.94–107. Szeged, Hungary: JGyTF Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldschneider, J. , & DeKeyser, R.
    (2001) Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1–50. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00147
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147 [Google Scholar]
  13. Golinkoff, R. M. , Hirsh-Pasek, K. , Cauley, K. M. , & Gordon, L.
    (1987) The eyes have it: Lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. Journal of Child Language, 14, 23–45. doi: 10.1017/S030500090001271X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500090001271X [Google Scholar]
  14. Hendriks, P.
    (2013) Asymmetries between language production and comprehension. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hendriks, P. , & Koster, C.
    (2010) Production/comprehension asymmetries in language. Lingua, 120, 1887–1897. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hopp, H.
    (2009) The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12 (4), 463–483. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990253
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990253 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hwang Jackson, K.
    (2008) The effect of information structure on Korean scrambling. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jin, K.-s. , Kim, M. J. , & Song, H.-j.
    (2015) The development of Korean preschoolers’ ability to understand transitive sentences using case-markers. The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28 (3), 75–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim, K.
    (2014) Unveiling linguistic competence by facilitating performance. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim, Y.-j.
    (1997) The acquisition of Korean. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol.4), pp.335–443. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kwon, N. , Polinsky, M. , & Kluender, R.
    (2006) Subject preference in Korean. In D. Baumer , D. Montero , & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.1–14. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kwon, S.-n. , & Zribi-Hertz, A.
    (2008) Differential function marking, cases, and information structure: Evidence from Korean. Language, 84, 258–299. doi: 10.1353/lan.0.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0005 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ladd, D. R.
    (1996) Intonational phonology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Laleko, O. , & Polinsky, M.
    (2016) Between syntax and discourse: Topic and case marking in heritage speakers and L2 learners of Japanese and Korean. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6 (4), 396–439. doi: 10.1075/lab.14018.lal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.14018.lal [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, C. , & Cho, S. W.
    (2009) Acquisition of the subject and topic nominals and markers in the spontaneous speech of young children in Korean. In C. Lee , G. Simpson & Y. Kim (Eds.), The handbook of Korean psycholinguistics, pp.23–33. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, H.
    (2006a) Effects of focus and markedness hierarchies on object case ellipsis in Korean. Discourse and Cognition, 13, 205–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2006b) Parallel optimization in case systems: Evidence from case ellipsis in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 15, 69–96. doi: 10.1007/s10831‑005‑3004‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-005-3004-1 [Google Scholar]
  28. Love, T. , Walenski, M. , & Swinney, D.
    (2009) Slowed speech input has a differential impact on on-line and off-line processing in children’s comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 38, 285–304. doi: 10.1007/s10936‑009‑9103‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9103-9 [Google Scholar]
  29. Montrul, S.
    (2010) Current issues in heritage language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 3–23. doi: 10.1017/S0267190510000103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000103 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2013) Structural changes in three heritage languages. Invited talk. Radboud University Languages in Contact, De Leeuwenhorst, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, January 23, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Montrul, S. , Bhatt, R. , Bhatia, A. , & Girju, R.
    (2012) Erosion of case and agreement in Hindi heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 141–176. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.2.02mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.2.02mon [Google Scholar]
  32. Montrul, S. , & Bowles, M.
    (2009) Back to basics: Differential Object Marking under incomplete acquisition in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12 (3), 363–383. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990071
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990071 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2010) Is grammar instruction beneficial for heritage language learners? Dative case marking in Spanish. The Heritage Language Journal7 (1), 47–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. National Institute of the Korean Language
    National Institute of the Korean Language (2002) Hyentay kwuke sayong pinto cosa [Investigation of word frequency on the contemporary Korean language]. Seoul: National Institute of the Korean Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. O’Grady, W. , Kwak, H.-Y. , Lee, O.-S. , & Lee, M.
    (2011) An emergentist perspective on heritage language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 223–245. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000744
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000744 [Google Scholar]
  36. Polinsky, M.
    (1997) Cross-linguistic parallels in language loss. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 14 (1–2), 87–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2006) Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 192–265.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2008a) Gender under incomplete acquisition: Heritage speakers’ knowledge of noun categorization. The Heritage Language Journal, 6 (1), 40–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2008b) Heritage language narratives. In D. Brinton , O. Kagan , & S. Bauckus (Eds.), Heritage Language Education. A New Field Emerging, pp.149–164. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Polinsky, M. , & Kagan, O.
    (2007) Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1 (5), 368–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00022.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00022.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Reinhart, T.
    (2006) Interface strategies: Reference-set computation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sekerina, I.
    (2003) Scrambling and processing: Complexity, dependencies, and constraints. In S. Karimi (Ed.), Word order and scrambling, pp.301–324. Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470758403.ch13
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758403.ch13 [Google Scholar]
  43. Song, H.-S. , & Schwartz, B. D.
    (2009) Testing the Fundamental Difference Hypothesis: L2 adult, L2 child, and L1 child comparisons in the acquisition of Korean wh-constructions with negative polarity items. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 323–361. doi: 10.1017/S0272263109090329
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090329 [Google Scholar]
  44. Song, M. , O’Grady, W. , Cho, S. , & Lee, M.
    (1997) The learning and teaching of Korean in community schools. In Y.-H. Kim (Ed.), Korean language in America2, pp.111–127. Los Angeles: American Association of Teachers of Korean.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sorace, A.
    (2011) Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33. doi: 10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor [Google Scholar]
  46. Sundara, M. , Demuth, K. , & Kuhl, P. K.
    (2011) Sentence-position effects on children’s perception and production of English third person singular -s . Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 55–71. doi: 10.1044/1092‑4388(2010/10‑0056)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0056) [Google Scholar]
  47. Unsworth, S.
    (2007) L1 and L2 acquisition between sentence and discourse: Comparing production and comprehension. Lingua, 117, 1930–1958. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2008) Comparing child L2 development with adult L2 development: How to measure L2 proficiency. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective, pp.301–333. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.46.15uns
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.46.15uns [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16001.kim
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16001.kim
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): case , comprehension , heritage Korean and production
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error