Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Previous research on Russian nominal inflection reports a processing advantage for the Nominative case, the citation form, in native and highly proficient nonnative speakers (Gor, Chrabaszcz, & Cook, 2017). However, it remains unclear whether this advantage is present only in single-word presentation, or it is a fundamental property of lexical storage and access. Moreover, it is unknown whether the processing costs for different cases in native and nonnative word recognition reflect the hierarchical structure of the nominal paradigm where cases have different functional load and type frequency. We report two lexical decision experiments with cross-modal morphosyntactic priming, which compare the processing of case-inflected noun targets preceded by adjective primes with ambiguous oblique-case inflections by native speakers, early (heritage) and late learners of Russian. While all groups showed a processing advantage for the citation form, only native speakers and highly proficient late learners were sensitive to the oblique-case type frequency hierarchy.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Babcock, L., Stowe, J. C., Maloof, C. J., Brovetto, C., & Ullman, M. T.
    (2012) The storage and composition of inflected forms in adult-learned second language: A study of the influence of length of residence, age of arrival, sex, and other factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 820–840. doi:  10.1017/S1366728912000053
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000053 [Google Scholar]
  2. Basnight-Brown, D. M., Chen, L., Hua, S., Kostić, A., & Feldman, L. B.
    (2007) Monolingual and bilingual recognition of regular and irregular English verbs: Sensitivity to form similarity varies with first language experience. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 65–80. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., & Pizzamiglio, L.
    (1996) Gender priming in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 992–1004. doi:  10.3758/BF03206827
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206827 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7, URL: CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lme4.
  5. Bowden, H. W., Gelfand, M. P., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T.
    (2010) Verbal inflectional morphology in L1 and L2 Spanish: A frequency effects study examining storage versus composition. Language Learning, 60, 44–87. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00551.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00551.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Clahsen, H., Balkhair, L., Schutter, J-S., & Cunnings, I.
    (2013) The time course of morphological processing in a second language. Second Language Research, 29, 7–31. doi:  10.1177/0267658312464970
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312464970 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
    (2006) Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42. doi:  10.1017/S0142716406060024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060024 [Google Scholar]
  8. Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R.
    (2010) Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60, 21–43. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00550.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00550.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A.
    (2013) Proficiency and working memory based explanations for nonnative speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 647–647. doi:  10.1017/S0142716411000890
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000890 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2015) Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 524–542. doi:  10.1017/S1366728914000200
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000200 [Google Scholar]
  11. Diependaele, K., Lemhöfer, K., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2013) The word frequency effect in first- and second-language word recognition: A lexical entrenchment account. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 843–863, doi:  10.1080/17470218.2012.720994
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.720994 [Google Scholar]
  12. Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L.
    (2010) ‘Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 83–99. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dussias, P. E., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Gerfen, C.
    (2013) When gender and looking go hand in hand: Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 353–387. doi:  10.1017/S0272263112000915
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000915 [Google Scholar]
  14. Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Basnight-Brown, D. M., Filipović Đurđević, D., Pastizzo, M. J.
    (2010) Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 119–135. doi:  10.1017/S1366728909990459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990459 [Google Scholar]
  15. Foote, R.
    (2015a) The production of gender agreement in native and L2 Spanish: The role of morphophonological form. Second Language Research, 31(3), 343–373. doi:  10.1177/0267658314565691
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314565691 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2015b) The storage and processing of morphologically complex words in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. FirstView Article doi:  10.1017/S0272263115000376Published online: 11 December 2015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000376 [Google Scholar]
  17. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C.
    (2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 35.1, 116–124. doi:  10.3758/BF03195503
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503 [Google Scholar]
  18. Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A.
    (2014) Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1461–1469. doi:  10.1037/a0036756
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036756 [Google Scholar]
  19. Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2001) Explaining the “Natural Order of L2 Morpheme Acquisition” in English: A Meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gor, K.
    (2015) Phonology and morphology in lexical processing. In: J. W. Schwieter (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing (pp.173–199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781107447257.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107447257.007 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gor, K., Chrabaszcz, A., & Cook, S.
    (2017) Processing of nonnative inflected words: Beyond affix stripping. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 315–332. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.014 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gor, K., & Cook, S.
    (2010) Non-native processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning, 60, 88–126. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00552.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00552.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Gor, K., & Jackson, S.
    (2013) Morphological decomposition and lexical access in a native and second language: A nesting doll effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1065–1091. doi:  10.1080/01690965.2013.776696
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.776696 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gurjanov, M., Lukatela, G., Lukatela, K., Savić, M., & Turvey, M. T.
    (1985) Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by the gender of possessive adjectives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 692.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gurjanov, M., Lukatela, G., Moskovljević, J., Savić, M., & Turvey, M. T.
    (1985) Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by inflected adjectives. Cognition, 19, 55–71. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0277(85)90031‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90031-9 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hopp, H.
    (2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between nonnative and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2013) Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29, 33–56. doi:  10.1177/0267658312461803
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461803 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hopp, H., & León Arriaga, M. E.
    (2016) Structural and inherent case in the non-native processing of Spanish: Constraints on inflectional variability. Second Language Research, 32, 75–108. doi:  10.1177/0267658315605872
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315605872 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jakobson, R.
    (1984) Contributions to the general theory of case: General meanings of the Russian cases. Russian and Slavic Grammar: Studies, 1931–1981, pp.59–103. Berlin-New York: Mouton. doi:  10.1515/9783110822885
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822885 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jegerski, J.
    (2016) Number attraction effects in near-native Spanish sentence comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 5–33. doi:  10.1017/S027226311400059X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311400059X [Google Scholar]
  31. Jiang, N.
    (2004) Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603–634. doi: 10.1017.S0142716404001298
    https://doi.org/10.1017.S0142716404001298 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2007) Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57, 1–33. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00397.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00397.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Jiang, N., Hu, G., Chrabaszcz, A., & Ye, L.
    (2017) The activation of grammaticalized meaning in L2 processing: Toward an explanation of the morphological congruency effect. International Journal of Bilingualism, doi: 1367006915603823
    https://doi.org/1367006915603823 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kerek, E., & Niemi, P.
    (2009) Russian orthography and learning to read. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21, 1–21. nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kirkici, B., & Clahsen, H.
    (2013) Inflection and derivation in native and non-native language processing: Masked priming experiments on Turkish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 776–791. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000648
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000648 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P., & Christensen, R.
    (2015) lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 2.0–25. CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest.
  37. Lukatela, G., Gligorijevic, B., Kostić, A., & Turvey, M. T.
    (1980) Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon. Memory and Cognition, 8, 415–423. doi:  10.3758/BF03211138
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211138 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lukatela, G., Kostić, A., Feldman, L. B., & Turvey, M. T.
    (1983) Grammatical priming of inflected nouns. Memory & Cognition, 11, 59–63. doi:  10.3758/BF03197662
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197662 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lukatela, G., Moraca, J., Stojnov, D., Savic, M. D., Katz, L., & Turvey, M. T.
    (1982) Grammatical priming effects between pronouns and inflected verb forms. Psychological Research, 44, 297–311. doi:  10.1007/BF00309326
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309326 [Google Scholar]
  40. Milin, P., Filipović Đurđević, D., Moscoso del Prado Martin, F.
    (2009) The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 50–64. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2008.08.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.08.007 [Google Scholar]
  41. Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S.
    (2008) Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503–553. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00449.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00449.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Neubauer, K., & Clahsen, H.
    (2009) Decomposition of inflected words in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 403–435. doi:  10.1017/S1366728912000648
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000648 [Google Scholar]
  43. Piper, T. H., & Leicester, P. F.
    (1980) Word association behavior as an indicator of English language proficiency, Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) documents [online]. Available: Accession number ED 227651.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Polinsky, M.
    (2008) Heritage language narratives. InD. Brinton, O. Kagan, & S. Bauckus (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp.108–156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Portin, M., Lehtonen, M., Harrer, G., Wande, E., Niemi, J., & Laine, M.
    (2008) L1 effects on the processing of inflected nouns in L2. Acta Psychologica, 128, 452–465. doi:  10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  46. Portin, M., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M.
    (2007) Processing of inflected nouns in late bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 135–56. doi:  10.1017/S014271640607007X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640607007X [Google Scholar]
  47. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URLwww.R-project.org/.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H.
    (2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971. doi:  10.1080/01690960802069730
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802069730 [Google Scholar]
  49. Reips, U. D.
    (2002) Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental psychology, 49(4), 243. doi:  10.1026//1618‑3169.49.4.243
    https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.243 [Google Scholar]
  50. Romanova, N., & Gor, K.
    (2017) Processing gender and number agreement in Russian as a second language: The devil is in the details. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 97–128. doi:  10.1017/S0272263116000012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000012 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rubinstein, G.
    (1995) On acquisition of Russian cases by American classroom learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 9–34. doi:  10.1515/iral.1995.33.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1995.33.1.9 [Google Scholar]
  52. Samojlova, M., & Slioussar, N.
    (2014) Frequencies of different grammatical features and inflectional affixes of Russian nouns: a database. Retrieved fromwww.slioussar.ru/freqdatabase.html
  53. Schoeffler, M., Stöter, F. R., Bayerlein, H., Edler, B., & Herre, J.
    (2013) An experiment about estimating the number of instruments in polyphonic music: A comparison between internet and laboratory results. ISMIR, 389–394.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Scontras, G., Fuchs, Z., & Polinsky, M.
    (2015) Heritage language and linguistic theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.1545. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01545
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01545 [Google Scholar]
  55. Shcherba, L. V.
    (1957) The main principles of orthography and their social significance. In: Selected Works on Russian Language, pp.45–49. Moscow: Uchpedgiz.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Silva, R., & Clahsen, H.
    (2008) Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260. doi:  10.1017/S1366728908003404
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003404 [Google Scholar]
  57. Slioussar, N., Stetsenko, A., & Matyushkina, T.
    (2017) Producing case errors in Russian. InY. Oseki, M. Esipova, and S. Harves (Eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The First New York Meeting 2015. (pp.363–379). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Michigan Slavic Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Taft, M.
    (2004) Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 745–765. doi:  10.1080/02724980343000477
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477 [Google Scholar]
  59. Vainio, S., Pajunen, A., & Hyönä, J.
    (2015) Processing modifier – head agreement in L1 and L2 Finnish: An eye-tracking study. Second Language Research, 32, 3–24. doi:  10.1177/0267658315592201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315592201 [Google Scholar]
  60. Voga, М., Anastassiadis-Symeonidis, А., & Giraudo, H.
    (2014) Does morphology play a role in L2 processing? Two masked priming experiments with Greek speakers of ESL. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 37, 338–352. doi:  10.1075/li.37.2.10vog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.37.2.10vog [Google Scholar]
  61. Witzel, J., Cornelius, S., Witzel, N., Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C.
    (2013) Testing the viability of webDMDX for masked priming experiments. The Mental Lexicon, 8, 421–449. doi:  10.1075/ml.8.3.07wit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.8.3.07wit [Google Scholar]
  62. Wolter, B.
    (2001) Comparing the L1 and L2 mental lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 41–69. doi:  10.1017/S0272263101001024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101001024 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): heritage speakers; Russian inflectional morphology; second language
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error