1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
  4. Volume 9, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Inflectional affixes only adhere to the head of Noun-Noun (NN) compounds which implies that the plural of (‘crib house’) or (‘werewolf’) is (‘crib houses’) and (‘werewolves’) respectively, while and ‒ with the plural inflectional affix on the modifier ‒ are ungrammatical. There seems to be more flexibility when it comes to derivational affixes since, in principle, the evaluative diminutive affix - appears to have scope over the whole compound, regardless of whether it is attached to the head or the modifier:  /  and  / . This would imply that the operation that results in the expression of plurality of the whole word via the inflectional affix - located on the semantic argument (the head of the compound), is more categorical than the one that regulates the scope of derivational morphemes (contra Zwicky, 1985). It would also imply that Cinque’s (2005) proposal according to which modifiers can c-command Nouns may be more in line with the behaviour of derivational affixes in Spanish NN compounds. Since this is a topic that has neither been discussed by Spanish grammarians nor received attention in the psycholinguistic literature, we have administered a Picture Selection Task with NN compounds exhibiting evaluative diminutive affixes to groups of L1 Spanish and L1 English-L2 Spanish speakers. Results show that for L1 Spanish speakers it is the affix on the head that has scope over the whole compound (in line with Zwicky’s 1985 proposal) while the L2 Spanish speakers treat derivational affixes as only having scope over the element to which they are attached.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16026.lic
2017-10-02
2024-10-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lab.16026.lic
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, M.
    (1978) Morphological investigations. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
  2. Bachrach, A., & Wagner, M.
    (2007) Syntactically driven cyclicity vs. Output-Output correspondence: the case of adjunction in diminutive morphology. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 1.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bermudez-Otero, R.
    (2007) Spanish pseudo-plurals: Phonological cues in the acquisition of a syntax-morphology mismatch. Proceedings of the British Academy, 145, 231–269.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bollaín, A.
    (2011) Adquisición de segundas lenguas: cómo interpretan los deverbales los estudiantes de español y los estudiantes de inglés. MA Research Paper. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cinque, G.
    (2005) Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3), 315–332. doi:  10.1162/0024389054396917
     https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389054396917 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clahsen, H.
    (1995) German plurals in adult second language development: Evidence for a dual-mechanism model of inflection. InL. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage: Studies in honor of William E. Rutherford (pp.123–137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/z.73.11cla
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.73.11cla [Google Scholar]
  7. De Belder, M., Faust, N., & Lampitelli, N.
    (2009) On an inflectional and a derivational diminutive. Paper presented at theRoots Workshop, June 10–12, 2009, Stuttgart University.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. (2015) On a low and a high diminutive. InA. Alexiadou, H. Borer & F. Schäfer (Eds.), The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gordon, P.
    (1985) Level-ordering in lexical development. Cognition, 21, 73–93. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0277(85)90046‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90046-0 [Google Scholar]
  10. Harris, J. W.
    (1991a) The Exponence of Gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 27–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. (1991b) The Form Classes of Spanish Substantives. InG. Booij & J. van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology4 (pp.65–88). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Lardiere, D.
    (1998) Parameter resetting in morphology: Evidence from compounding. InM. -L. Beck (Ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp.286–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/lald.19.12lar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.19.12lar [Google Scholar]
  13. Liceras, J. M.
    (2014) La adquisición de lenguas extranjeras aquí y ahora o… cómo abordar la hipótesis de la interlengua en el siglo XXI. InJ. Santiago Guervós & Y. González Plasencia (Eds.), El español global. Valladolid: Fundación Siglo para el Turismo y las Artes de Castilla y León.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Liceras, J. M. & Díaz, L.
    (2000) Triggers in L2 acquisition: the case of Spanish NN compounds. Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 197–211. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9582.00060
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00060 [Google Scholar]
  15. Liceras, J. M., Díaz, L. & Salomaa-Robertson, T.
    (2002) The compounding parameter and the word-marker hypothesis. InA. T. Pérez-Leroux & J. M. Liceras (Eds.), The Acquisition of Spanish Morphosyntax (pp.209–238). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0291‑2_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0291-2_8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Liceras, J. M. & Klassen, R.
    (2016) The representation of headedness in the mind of non-native Spanish speakers. Evidence from compounding and derivation. Paper presented at theEUROSLA 2016, University of Jyväskylä, Finland. August 24–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Nicoladis, E.
    (2002) What’s the difference between “toilet paper” and “paper toilet”? French-English bilingual children’s crosslinguistic transfer in compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 29, 843–863. doi:  10.1017/S0305000902005366
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902005366 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2003) What compound nouns mean to preschool children. Brain and Language, 84, 38–49. doi:  10.1016/S0093‑934X(02)00519‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00519-9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Nicoladis, E. & Murphy, V. A.
    (2004) Level-ordering does not constrain children’s ungrammatical compounds. Brain and Language, 90, 487–494. doi:  10.1016/S0093‑934X(03)00460‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00460-7 [Google Scholar]
  20. Nuñez Cedeño, R.
    (1992) Headship assignment in Spanish compounds. InC. Laeufer & T. A. Morgan (Eds.), Theoretical Analyses in Romance Linguistics (pp.131–149). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Piera, C.
    (1995) On compounding in English and in Spanish. InH. Campos & P. Kempchinsky (Eds.), Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory (pp.302–355). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Pomerleau, J.
    (2001) La adquisición del español en el aula: los compuestos nominales de los franceses de Canadá. MA Thesis. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Salomaa-Robertson, T.
    (2000) L2 Acquisition of Spanish Compounds by native speakers of Finnish. MA thesis. University of Ottawa, Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Scalise, S., & Bisetto, A.
    (2011) The classification of compounds. InR. Lieber & P. Stekauer (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Compounding (pp.34–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0003
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0003 [Google Scholar]
  25. Snyder, W.
    (2016) Compound word formation. InJ. Lidz, W. Snyder, & J. Pater (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Linguistics (pp.89–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (1995) Language Acquisition and Language Variation: The Role of Morphology. PhD Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Val Álvaro, J. F.
    (1999) La composición. InI. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Nueva gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp.4757–841). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Walsh, L.
    (2013a) Diminutive suffixes and N-N compounds in Spanish: A look at the role of headedness in derivation. Paper read at the2013 Quebec-Ontario Dialogues on Acquisition and Spanish (QODAS), The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. April 12.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. (2013b) Languages in Contact: Compound Affixation in Native Spanish. Unplublished Manuscript. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Zwicky, A. M.
    (1985) Heads. Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 1–29. doi:  10.1017/S0022226700010008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010008 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16026.lic
Loading
Compounding and derivation
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9, 42 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16026.lic
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16026.lic
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16026.lic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): evaluative affixes; headedness; noun-noun compounds

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error