1887
image of The influence of the native language on phonological preparation in spoken word production in a second language
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

    The influence of the native language on phonological preparation in spoken word production in a second language

  • Author(s): Chuchu Li 1 , Yakov Kronrod 2, 3  and Min Wang 4
  • View Affiliations Hide Affiliations
    Affiliations: 1: University of California, San Diego; 2: Amazon Web Services, Seattle; 3: University of Pennsylvania; 4: University of Maryland, College Park
  • Source: Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
    Available online: 20 February 2018
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16027.li
    • Received : 14 Jun 2016
    • Accepted : 24 Jan 2018
    • Version of Record published : 20 Feb 2018

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the phonological preparation unit in planning English spoken words, comparing English monolinguals, native Chinese and Japanese-speakers who spoke English as their second language. All three groups named pictures in English, and the names could either share the same initial phoneme, mora, or syllable, or had no systematic commonality. A phoneme preparation effect was shown among English monolinguals but not among the two bilingual groups, suggesting that the phoneme is the phonological preparation unit for English monolinguals, but not for the two bilingual groups. All three groups showed mora and syllable preparation effects, but further analysis and a follow-up experiment suggested that Chinese-English bilinguals may treat morae as open syllables. English monolinguals showed similar phoneme and mora preparation effect sizes, possibly as a result of flexibility. Together, the selection of phonological preparation could be flexible, influenced by both the nature of the target language and speakers’ language experiences.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16027.li
2018-02-20
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alario, F. -X., Perre, L., Castel, C., & Ziegler, J. C.
    (2007) The role of orthography in speech production revisited. Cognition, 102(3), 464–475. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2013) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-5. CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bock, K.
    (1991) A sketchbook of production problems. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Special Issue: Sentence Processing, 20, 141–160. doi: 10.1007/BF01067212
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067212 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, J. -Y.
    (1993) A small corpus of speech errors in Mandarin Chinese and their classification. World of Chinese Language, 69, 26–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, J. -Y., Chen, T. -M., & Dell, G. S.
    (2002) Word-Form Encoding in Mandarin Chinese as Assessed by the Implicit Priming Task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 751–781. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2825
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2825 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, J. -Y., & Li, C. -Y.
    (2011) Word form encoding in Chinese word naming and word typing. Cognition, 121(1), 140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, T. -M., & Chen, J. -Y.
    (2013) The syllable as the proximate unit in Mandarin Chinese word production: An intrinsic or accidental property of the production system?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(1), 154–162. doi: 10.3758/s13423‑012‑0326‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0326-7 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, J. Y., Lin, W. C., & Ferrand, L.
    (2003) Masked priming of the syllable in Mandarin Chinese speech production. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 45(1), 107–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, C. -C.
    (1973) A synchronic phonology of Mandarin Chinese. The Hague: Mouton doi: 10.1515/9783110866407
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866407
  10. Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N.
    (2007) Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 195–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2009) Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 685–712. doi: 10.1080/01690960802351260
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802351260 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J.
    (1999) Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1568–1581.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J.
    (1993) Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 453–465. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.85.3.453
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.453 [Google Scholar]
  14. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C.
    (2003) DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124. doi: 10.3758/BF03195503
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldinger, S. D., & Azuma, T.
    (2003) Puzzle-solving science: The quixotic quest for units in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31(3), 305–320. doi: 10.1016/S0095‑4470(03)00030‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00030-5 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gottardo, A., Yan, B., Siegel, L. S., & Wade-Woolley, L.
    (2001) Factors related to English reading performance in children with Chinese as a first language: More evidence of cross-language transfer of phonological processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 530–542. doi: 10.1037/0022‑0663.93.3.530
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.530 [Google Scholar]
  17. Grotjahn, R., Klein-Braley, C., & Raatz, U.
    (2002) C-Test: an over-view. InJ. A. Coleman, R. Grotjahn & U. Raatz (Eds.), University Language Testing and the C-Test. (pp.93–114). Bochum: AKS-Verlag Finkenstaedt.
  18. Hyman, L. M.
    (1985) A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.
  19. Ida, K., Nakayama, M., & Lupker, S. J.
    (2015) The functional phonological unit of Japanese-English bilinguals is language dependent: Evidence from masked onset and mora priming effects. Japanese Psychological Research, 57(1), 38–49. doi: 10.1111/jpr.12066
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12066 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacobs, C. L. & Dell, G. S.
    (2014) ‘hotdog’ not ‘hot’ ‘dog’: The phonological planning of compound words. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 29, 512–523. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2014.892144
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.892144 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kanopka, A. E.
    (2012) Planning ahead: How recent experience with structures and words changes the scope of linguistic planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 153–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kinoshita, S.
    (2000) The left-to-right nature of the masked onset priming effect in naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 133–141. doi: 10.3758/BF03210732
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210732 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kubozono, H.
    (1989). The mora and syllable structure in Japanese: Evidence from speech errors. Language and Speech, 32(3), 249–278. doi: 10.1177/002383098903200304
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098903200304 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kureta, Y., Fushimi, T., Sakuma, N., & Tatsumi, I. F.
    (2015) Orthographic influences on the word-onset phoneme preparation effect in native Japanese speakers: Evidence from the word-form preparation paradigm. Japanese Psychological Research, 57(1), 50–60. doi: 10.1111/jpr.12067
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12067 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kureta, Y., Fushimi, T., & Tatsumi, I. F.
    (2006) The functional unit in phonological encoding: Evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1102–1119. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.32.5.1102
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1102 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2015) lmerTest: tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-29. CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
  27. Levelt, W. J. M.
    (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Bradford, Cambridge, MA.
  28. Levelt, W. J.
    (1992) Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(92)90038‑J
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-J [Google Scholar]
  29. Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
    (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(01), 1–38. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99001776
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776 [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, C., Wang, M., & Davis, J. A.
    (2017) The phonological preparation unit in spoken word production in a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20 (2) 2017, 351–366. doi: 10.1017/S1366728915000711
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000711 [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, C., Wang, M., & Idsardi, W.
    (2015) The effect of orthographic form-cuing on the phonological preparation unit in spoken word production. Memory & Cognition, 43(4), 563–578. doi: 10.3758/s13421‑014‑0484‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0484-0 [Google Scholar]
  32. Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M.
    (2007) The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. doi: 10.1044/1092‑4388(2007/067)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067) [Google Scholar]
  33. Meyer, A. S.
    (1990) The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(5), 524–545. doi: 10.1016/0749‑596X(90)90050‑A
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90050-A [Google Scholar]
  34. McBride-Chang, C., Bialystok, E., Chong, K. K., & Li, Y.
    (2004) Levels of phonological awareness in three cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89(2), 93–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Meyer, A. S.
    (1991) The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 69–89. doi: 10.1016/0749‑596X(91)90011‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90011-8 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakayama, M., Kinoshita, S., & Verdonschot, R. G.
    (2016) The Emergence of a Phoneme-Sized Unit in L2 Speech Production: Evidence from Japanese–English Bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 175. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00175
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00175 [Google Scholar]
  37. O’Seaghdha, P. G., Chen, J. -Y., & Chen, T. -M.
    (2010) Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition, 115(2), 282–302. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  38. O’Séaghdha, P. G., & Frazer, A. K.
    (2014) The exception does not rule: Attention constrains form preparation in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 797–810. doi: 10.1037/a0035576
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035576 [Google Scholar]
  39. Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A., & Mehler, J.
    (1993) Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of memory and language, 32(2), 258–278. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1993.1014
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1014 [Google Scholar]
  40. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 3-900051-07-0, URLwww.R-project.org.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Roelofs, A.
    (1999) Phonological segments and features as planning units in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(2), 173–200. doi: 10.1080/016909699386338
    https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386338 [Google Scholar]
  42. Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
    (1998) Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 922–939. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.24.4.922
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.4.922 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shu, H., Peng, H., & McBride-Chang, C.
    (2008) Phonological awareness in young Chinese children. Developmental Science, 11(1), 171–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00654.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00654.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Tseng, C. H., Huang, K. Y., & Jeng, J. Y.
    (1996) The role of the syllable in perceiving spoken Chinese. Proceedings of the National Science Council, 6(1), 7l–86
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Van de Velde, M., Meyer, A. S., & Konopka, A. E.
    (2014) Message formulation and structural assembly: describing “easy” and “hard” events with preferred and dispreferred syntactic structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 71(1), 124–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Verdonschot, R. G., Kiyama, S., Tamaoka, K., Kinoshita, S., La Heij, W., & Schiller, N. O.
    (2011) The functional unit of Japanese word naming: evidence from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1458–1473.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Verdonschot, R. G., Lai, J., Chen, F., Tamaoka, K., & Schiller, N. O.
    (2015) Constructing initial phonology in Mandarin Chinese: Syllabic or subsyllabic? A masked priming investigation. Japanese Psychological Research, 57(1), 61–68. doi: 10.1111/jpr.12064
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12064 [Google Scholar]
  48. Verdonschot, R. G., Nakayama, M., Zhang, Q., Tamaoka, K., & Schiller, N. O.
    (2013) The Proximate Phonological Unit of Chinese-English Bilinguals: Proficiency Matters. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e61454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061454
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061454 [Google Scholar]
  49. Wagner, V., Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H.
    (2010) On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: Effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 423–440.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wong, A. W. -K., & Chen, H. -C.
    (2008) Processing segmental and prosodic information in Cantonese word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34, 1172–1190.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2009) What are effective phonological units in Cantonese spoken word planning?Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 888–892. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.888
    https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.888 [Google Scholar]
  52. You, W., Zhang, Q., & Verdonschot, R. G.
    (2012) Masked syllable priming effects in word and picture naming in Chinese. PloS One, 7(10), e46595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046595
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046595 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16027.li
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16027.li
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: phonological preparation; bilinguals; language production
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error