1887
image of Listener-adapted speech
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN 1879-9272
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

While a significant amount of research has focussed on whether bilingualism bestows advantages in cognitive skills, perspective-taking and Theory of Mind, less is known about the effect of bilingualism in communicative tasks where these and related skills may be called for. This study examines bilingual and monolingual adults’ communicative skills through their production of two types of listener-adapted speech (LAS): child-directed speech and foreigner-directed speech. 20 monolinguals and 20 bilingual adults were asked to explain a cooking recipe to a child, a non-native adult and a control native adult. Participants adapted their speech for the child and the foreigner compared to the native adult. Furthermore, bilinguals adapted some features of their speech to a greater extent and in a fine-tuned way (wider pitch range addressing the child and vowel hyperarticulation addressing the foreigner). The prevalence of these features in bilingual speech was not correlated with personality or cognitive measures. We discuss possible sources of this difference in speech adaptation and implications for theories of bilingual cognition.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16054.lor
2018-02-26
2018-09-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allison, C., Auyeung, B., & Baron-Cohen, S.
    (2012) Toward Brief “Red Flags” for Autism Screening: The Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 Cases and 3,000 Controls. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(2), 202–212.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2011.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Antón, E., Duñabeitia, J. A., Estévez, A., Hernández, J. A., Castillo, A., Fuentes, L. J., … Carreiras, M.
    (2014) Is there a bilingual advantage in the ANT task? Evidence from children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 398. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00398
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00398 [Google Scholar]
  3. Antoniou, K., Kambanaros, M., Grohmann, K. K., & Katsos, N.
    (2014) Is bilectalism similar to bilingualism? An investigation into children’s vocabulary and executive control skills. In BUCLD 38: Proceedings of the38th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol.1, pp.12–24). Cascadilla Press Somerville, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barac, R., & Bialystok, E.
    (2012) Bilingual Effects on Cognitive and Linguistic Development: Role of Language, Cultural Background, and Education. Child Development, 83(2), doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.2011.01707.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01707.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Ben-Zeev, S.
    (1977) The influence of bilingualism on cognitive strategy and cognitive development. Child Development, 48(3), 1009–1018. doi: 10.2307/1128353
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1128353 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biersack, S., Biersack, S., Kempe, V., & Knapton, L.
    (2005) FineTuning Speech Registers: A Comparison of the Prosodic Features of Child-Directed and Foreigner-Directed Speech. In: Proceedings of the 9th European conference on speech communication and technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bradlow, A. R.
    (2002) Confluent talker- and listener-related forces in clear speech production. Mouton de Gruyter. Retrieved fromhttps://www.scholars.northwestern.edu/en/publications/confluent-talker-and-listener-related-forces-in-clear-speech-prod
  8. Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T.
    (2002) The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(1), 272–284. doi: 10.1121/1.1487837
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1487837 [Google Scholar]
  9. Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., McLean, J. F., & Brown, A.
    (2011) The role of beliefs in lexical alignment: Evidence from dialogs with humans and computers. Cognition, 121(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.011 [Google Scholar]
  10. Burnham, D., Kitamura, C., & Vollmer-Conna, U.
    (2002) What’s new, pussycat? On talking to babies and animals. Science (New York, N.Y.), 296(5572), 1435. doi: 10.1126/science.1069587
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1069587 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carlson, S. M., & Meltzoff, A. N.
    (2008) Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11(2), 282–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2008.00675.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00675.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Culbertson, G. H., & Caporael, L. R.
    (1983) Baby Talk Speech to the Elderly. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(2), 305–312. doi: 10.1177/0146167283092016
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283092016 [Google Scholar]
  13. DePaulo, B. M., & Coleman, L. M.
    (1986) Talking to children, foreigners, and retarded adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 945–59. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.51.5.945
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.945 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dewaele, J. -M., & van Oudenhoven, J. P.
    (2009) The effect of multilingualism/multiculturalism on personality: no gain without pain for Third Culture Kids?International Journal of Multilingualism, 6(4), 443–459. doi: 10.1080/14790710903039906
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710903039906 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dewaele, J. -M., & Wei, L.
    (2012) Multilingualism, empathy and multicompetence. International Journal of Multilingualism, 9(4), 352–366. doi: 10.1080/14790718.2012.714380
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2012.714380 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I. A., & Blakemore, S. -J.
    (2010) Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science, 13(2), 331–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2009.00888.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00888.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Duñabeitia, J. A., Hernández, J. A., Antón, E., Macizo, P., Estévez, A., Fuentes, L. J., & Carreiras, M.
    (2014) The Inhibitory Advantage in Bilingual Children Revisited. Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 234–251. doi: 10.1027/1618‑3169/a000243
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000243 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fan, S. P., Liberman, Z., Keysar, B., & Kinzler, K. D.
    (2015) The Exposure Advantage. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1090–1097. doi: 10.1177/0956797615574699
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615574699 [Google Scholar]
  19. Farwell, C. B., Snow, C. E., & Ferguson, C. A.
    (1979) Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition. Language, 55(2), 449. doi: 10.2307/412603
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412603 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ferguson, C. A.
    (1977) Baby talk as a simplified register Snow, CE FergusonC. A.InC. E. Snow & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to Children. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1964) Baby Talk in Six Languages. American Anthropologist, 66 (6_PART2), 103–114. doi: 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00060
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00060 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D.
    (2002) Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(1), 259–71. Retrieved fromwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12141351
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fernald, A.
    (1993) Approval and Disapproval: Infant Responsiveness to Vocal Affect in Familiar and Unfamiliar Languages. Child Development, 64(3), 657–674. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑8624.1993.tb02934.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02934.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., de Boysson-Bardies, B., & Fukui, I.
    (1989) A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 16(3), 477. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900010679
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900010679 [Google Scholar]
  25. Foltz, A., Gaspers, J., Thiele, K., Stenneken, P., & Cimiano, P.
    (2015) Lexical alignment in triadic communication. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 127. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00127
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00127 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gallaway, C., & Richards, B. J.
    (1994) Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620690
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620690 [Google Scholar]
  27. Genesee, F., Tucker, G. R., & Lambert, W. E.
    (1975) Communication Skills of Bilingual Children. Child Development, 46(4), 1010–1014. doi: 10.2307.1128415
    https://doi.org/10.2307.1128415 [Google Scholar]
  28. Goetz, P. J.
    (2003) The effects of bilingualism on theory of mind development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1017/S1366728903001007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001007 [Google Scholar]
  29. Goldman, M. C., Negen, J., & Sarnecka, B. W.
    (2014) Are bilingual children better at ignoring perceptually misleading information? A novel test. Developmental Science, 17(6), 956–964. doi: 10.1111/desc.12175
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12175 [Google Scholar]
  30. Greenberg, A., Bellana, B., & Bialystok, E.
    (2013) Perspective-taking ability in bilingual children: Extending advantages in executive control to spatial reasoning. Cognitive Development, 28(1), 41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  31. Grosjean, F.
    (2010) Bilingual: Life and Reality. Sociolinguistic Studies, 6, 595–602. doi: 10.1558/sols.v6i3.595
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v6i3.595 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gullberg, M.
    (2012) Bilingualism and Gesture. InThe Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism (pp.417–437). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781118332382.ch17
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118332382.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  33. Han, S., & Lee, K.
    (2013) Cognitive and Affective Perspective-Taking Ability of Young Bilinguals in South Korea. Child Studies in Diverse Contexts, 3(1), 69–80. doi: 10.5723/csdc.2013.3.1.069
    https://doi.org/10.5723/csdc.2013.3.1.069 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hazan, V., & Markham, D.
    (2004) Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(5), 3108–3118. doi: 10.1121/1.1806826
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1806826 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hazan, V., & Baker, R.
    (2011) Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(4), 2139–2152. doi: 10.1121/1.3623753
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3623753 [Google Scholar]
  36. Katsos, N., Grohmann, K. K., Kambanaros, M., & Antoniou, K.
    (n.d.). Is bilectalism similar to bilingualism? An investigation into children’s vocabulary and executive control skills. Retrieved fromhttps://www.academia.edu/12673481/Is_bilectalism_similar_to_bilingualism_An_investigation_into_children_s_vocabulary_and_executive_control_skills
  37. Kemper, S., Finter‐Urczyk, A., Ferrell, P., Harden, T., & Billington, C.
    (1998) Using elderspeak with older adults. Discourse Processes, 25(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1080/01638539809545020
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545020 [Google Scholar]
  38. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S.
    (2000) Taking Perspective in Conversation: The Role of Mutual Knowledge in Comprehension. Psychological Science, 11(1), 32–38. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9280.00211
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00211 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kharkhurin, A. V.
    (2010) Kharkhurin: Bilingual verbal and nonverbal creativity Bilingual verbal and nonverbal creative behavior. International Journal of Bilingualism The International Journal of Bilingualisms, 14(142), 211–226. doi: 10.1177/1367006910363060
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006910363060 [Google Scholar]
  40. Knoll, M., Uther, M., MacLeod, N., O’Neill, M., Walsh, S.
    (2006) Emotional, linguistic or just cute? The function of pitch contours in infant- and foreigner-directed speech. Paper presented atthe 3rd International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dresden, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kovács, A. M., & Mehler, J.
    (2009) Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(16), 6556–60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811323106
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811323106 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kuhl, P. K.
    (1997) Cross-Language Analysis of Phonetic Units in Language Addressed to Infants. Science, 277(5326), 684–686. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5326.684
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5326.684 [Google Scholar]
  43. Liberman, Z., Woodward, A. L., Keysar, B., & Kinzler, K. D.
    (2017) Exposure to multiple languages enhances communication skills in infancy. Developmental Science, 20(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1111/desc.12420
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12420 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lindblom, B.
    (1990) Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory. InSpeech Production and Speech Modelling (pp.403–439). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2037‑8_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mangold, R., & Pobel, R.
    (1988) Informativeness and Instrumentality in Referential Communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7(3–4), 181–191. doi: 10.1177/0261927X8800700403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8800700403 [Google Scholar]
  46. Martin-Rhee, M. M., & Bialystok, E.
    (2008) The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 81–93. doi: 10.1017/S1366728907003227
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003227 [Google Scholar]
  47. Morton, J. B., & Harper, S. N.
    (2007) What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science, 10(6), 719–726. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2007.00623.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00623.x [Google Scholar]
  48. Paap, K. R., Darrow, J., Dalibar, C., & Johnson, H. A.
    (2014) Effects of script similarity on bilingual advantages in executive control are likely to be negligible or null. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01539
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01539 [Google Scholar]
  49. Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z. I.
    (2013) There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66(2), 232–258. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  50. Paap, K. R., Johnson, H. A., & Sawi, O.
    (2015a) Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 69, 265–278. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.014 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2015b) Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 69, 265–278. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.014 [Google Scholar]
  52. Pisoni, D. B., & Remez, R. E.
    (2008) The Handbook of Speech Perception. InThe Handbook of Speech Perception (pp.1–708). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9780470757024
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757024 [Google Scholar]
  53. Prato-Previde, E., Fallani, G., & Valsecchi, P.
    (2006) Gender Differences in Owners Interacting with Pet Dogs: An Observational Study. Ethology, 112(1), 64–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1439‑0310.2006.01123.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01123.x [Google Scholar]
  54. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P.
    (2007) Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  55. Rondal, J. A.
    (1980) Fathers’ and mothers’ speech in early language development. Journal of Child Language, 7(2), 353–69. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900002671
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900002671 [Google Scholar]
  56. Rubio-Fernández, P.
    (2016) The director task: A test of Theory-of-Mind use or selective attention?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi: 10.3758/s13423‑016‑1190‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1190-7 [Google Scholar]
  57. Rubio-Fernández, P., & Glucksberg, S.
    (2012) Reasoning about other people’s beliefs: Bilinguals have an advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 211–217. doi: 10.1037/a0025162
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025162 [Google Scholar]
  58. Ryskin, R. A., Brown-Schmidt, S., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Yiu, L. K., & Nguyen, E. T.
    (2014) Visuospatial perspective-taking in conversation and the role of bilingual experience. Journal of Memory and Language, 74, 46–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  59. Scarborough, R., Brenier, J. M., Zhao, Y., Hall-Lew, L., & Dmitrieva, O.
    (2007) An acoustic study of real and imagined foreigner-directed speech. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, (August), 2165–2168. doi: 10.1121/1.4781735
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4781735 [Google Scholar]
  60. Siegal, M., Iozzi, L., & Surian, L.
    (2009) Bilingualism and conversational understanding in young children. Cognition, 110(1), 115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sullivan, M. D., Janus, M., Moreno, S., Astheimer, L., & Bialystok, E.
    (2014) Early stage second-language learning improves executive control: Evidence from ERP. Brain and Language, 139, 84–98. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  62. Uther, M., Knoll, M. A., & Burnham, D.
    (2007) Do you speak E-NG-L-I-SH? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech. Speech Communication, 49(1), 2–7. doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2006.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2006.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  63. Walsh, S.
    (n.d.). Emotional, linguistic or just cute? The function of pitch contours in infant- and foreigner-directed speech. Retrieved fromhttps://www.academia.edu/25084410/Emotional_linguistic_or_just_cute_The_function_of_pitch_contours_in_infant-_and_foreigner-directed_speech
  64. Wassink, A. B., Wright, R. A., & Franklin, A. D.
    (2007) Intraspeaker variability in vowel production: An investigation of motherese, hyperspeech, and Lombard speech in Jamaican speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 363–379. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2006.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2006.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  65. Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M.
    (2016) Children Increase Their Sensitivity to a Speaker’s Nonlinguistic Cues Following a Communicative Breakdown. Child Development, 87(2), 385–394. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12479
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12479 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16054.lor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.16054.lor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error