1887
image of Language bias and proficiency effects on cross-language activation
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Recent research proposes that language bias and proficiency modulate cross-language activation in comprehension and production, but it is unclear how they operate and whether they interact. This study investigates whether stress differences between Spanish-English cognates (, final-syllable stress in Spanish) affect how native-English second-language-Spanish bilinguals recognize Spanish words ( “subject/matter,” second-syllable stress in Spanish). In a Spanish-English eye-tracking experiment (and parallel production task), participants heard/produced trisyllabic Spanish targets with second-syllable stress () and saw four orthographic words, including the target and a Spanish-English cognate competitor. Cross-language activation was examined by manipulating the stress of the cognate in English. In comprehension, English cognates with the same stress as the Spanish target ( vs ) were predicted to cause more cross-language interference than English cognates with a different stress ( “bunk bed,” vs ), but the reverse pattern was expected in production. Participants were assigned to a Spanish-bias condition (20% of English (filler) items), or an English-bias condition (65% of English (filler) items). Results indicate that English cognates with the same stress as the Spanish target interfered with the recognition of the Spanish target only in the English-bias condition (but facilitated its production), while increasing Spanish proficiency helped reduce this cross-linguistic interference.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.17023.mar
2018-12-10
2019-08-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baayen, R. H.
    (2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Processing (Vol.2). Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1558/sols.v2i3.471
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v2i3.471 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). doi:  10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V.
    (2011) Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension. Cognition, 118(2), 245–257. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.012 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2010) Praat: doing phonetics by computers. Retrieved fromwww.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
  5. Brown, J. D.
    (1980) Relative merits of four methods for scoring cloze tests. Modern Language Journal, 64, 311–317. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1980.tb05198.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1980.tb05198.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Brehm, L., Brick, C. a., Brown-Schmidt, S., Fischer, K., & Wagner, K.
    (2010) Carpet or Cárcel: The effect of age of acquisition and language mode on bilingual lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes (Vol.25). doi:  10.1080/01690960903474912
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903474912 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H.
    (2009) Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Cognition, 35(4), 1029–1040.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chee, M. W., Tan, E. W., & Thiel, T.
    (1999) Mandarin and English single word processing studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 19(8), 3050–3056. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19‑08‑03050.1999
    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03050.1999 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R.
    (2002) Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45(3), 207–228. 10.1177/00238309020450030101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309020450030101 [Google Scholar]
  10. Costa, A., & Santesteban, M.
    (2004) Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I.
    (2006) How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1057–1074. doi:  10.1037/0278‑7393.32.5.1057
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1057 [Google Scholar]
  12. Desmet, T., & Duyck, W.
    (2007) Bilingual language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(3), 168–194. doi:  10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00008.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00008.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Desroches, A. S., Newman, R. L., & Joanisse, M. F.
    (2009) Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1893–1906. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21142.Investigating
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21142.Investigating [Google Scholar]
  14. Dijkstra, T.
    (2005) Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. InHandbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches (pp.179–201).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dijkstra, T., & van Hell, J. G.
    (2003) Testing the Language Mode Hypothesis Using Trilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6(1), 2–16. doi:  10.1080/13670050308667769
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050308667769 [Google Scholar]
  16. Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián, N., Martí, M. A., & Carreiras, M.
    (2013) EsPal: one-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1246–58. doi:  10.3758/s13428‑013‑0326‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0326-1 [Google Scholar]
  17. Duffau, H.
    (2008) The anatomo-functional connectivity of language revisited. New insights provided by electrostimulation and tractography. Neuropsychologia, 46(4), 927–934. doi:  10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.025 [Google Scholar]
  18. Flege, J. E.
    (1987) A critical period for learning to pronounce foreign languages?Applied Linguistics, 8, 162–177. 10.1093/applin/8.2.162
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/8.2.162 [Google Scholar]
  19. García-Pentón, L., Pérez Fernández, A., Iturria-Medina, Y., Gillon-Dowens, M., & Carreiras, M.
    (2014) Anatomical connectivity changes in the bilingual brain. NeuroImage, 84, 495–504. doi:  10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.064
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.064 [Google Scholar]
  20. Golestani, N., Alario, F. X., Meriaux, S., Le Bihan, D., Dehaene, S., & Pallier, C.
    (2006) Syntax production in bilinguals. Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1029–1040. doi:  10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gollan, T. H., & Ferreira, L.-A. R.
    (2004) What is a TOT? Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and tagalog-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 246–269. doi:  10.1037/0278‑7393.30.1.246
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.246 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C.
    (2008) More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 787–814. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Grainger, J., & Beauvillain, C.
    (1987) Language blocking and lexical access in bilinguals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. doi:  10.1080/14640748708401788
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748708401788 [Google Scholar]
  24. Green, D.
    (1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81. doi:  10.1017/S1366728998000133
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133 [Google Scholar]
  25. Grosjean, F.
    (1998) The Bilingual Individual. Interpreting, 2, 163–187. 10.1075/intp.2.1‑2.07gro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.2.1-2.07gro [Google Scholar]
  26. Guo, T., & Peng, D.
    (2006) Event-related potential evidence for parallel activation of two languages in bilingual speech production. Neuroreport, 17(17), 1757–1760. doi:  10.1097/01.wnr.0000246327.89308.a5
    https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000246327.89308.a5 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hallett, P. E.
    (1986) Eye movements. InJ. P. K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of perception and human performance (p.10.1–10.112). New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hanulová, J., Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P.
    (2011) Where does the delay in L2 picture naming come from? Psycholinguistic and neurocognitive evidence on second language word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(7), 902–934. doi:  10.1080/01690965.2010.509946
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.509946 [Google Scholar]
  29. Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M.
    (2007) The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 460–482. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jackson, G. M., Swainson, R., Cunnington, R., & Jackson, S. R.
    (2001) ERP correlates of executive control during repeated language switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 169–178. doi:  10.1017/S1366728901000268
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728901000268 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jeong, H., Sugiura, M., Sassa, Y., Haji, T., Usui, N., Taira, M., … Kawashima, R.
    (2007) Effect of syntactic similarity on cortical activation during second language processing: A comparison of English and Japanese among native Korean trilinguals. Human Brain Mapping, 28(3), 194–204. doi:  10.1002/hbm.20269
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20269 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ju, M., & Luce, P.
    (2004) Falling on Sensitive Ears: Constraints on Bilingual Lexical Activation. Psychological Science, 15(5), 314–318. 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2004.00675.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00675.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Klein, D., Watkins, K. E., Zatorre, R. J., & Milner, B.
    (2006) Word and nonword repetition in bilingual subjects: A PET study. Human Brain Mapping, 27(2), 153–161. doi:  10.1002/hbm.20174
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20174 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, B., & Christensen, H.
    (2016) Tests in linear mixed effects models. Version 2.0.32.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lagrou, E., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W.
    (2013a) Interlingual competition in a spoken sentence context: Evidence from the visual world paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review2, 20, 963–972. 10.3758/s13423‑013‑0405‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0405-4 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2013b) The influence of sentence context and accented speech on lexical access in second-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition2, 16(3), 508–517. 10.1017/S1366728912000508
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000508 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M.
    (2012) Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0146‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0 [Google Scholar]
  38. Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A.
    (2009) Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381–390. 10.1037/a0014875
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014875 [Google Scholar]
  39. Linck, J. a., Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2008) Cross-language lexical processes and inhibitory control. The Mental Lexicon, 3(3), 349–374. doi:  10.1075/ml.3.3.06lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.3.3.06lin [Google Scholar]
  40. Luce, P. a, & Pisoni, D. B.
    (1998) Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1–36. doi:  10.1097/00003446‑199802000‑00001
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Marian, V., & Spivey, M.
    (2003) Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 173–193. doi:  10.1017/S0142716403000092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716403000092 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2003a) Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 97–115. doi: 10.1017/S1366728903001068
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001068 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2003b) Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 97–115. doi:  10.1017/S1366728903001068
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001068 [Google Scholar]
  44. Marslen-wilson, W. D.
    (1987) Functional parallelism in spoken. Cognition, 25, 71–102. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0277(87)90005‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9 [Google Scholar]
  45. Martínez-García, M. T., Van Anne, K., Brown, R., & Tremblay, A.
    (n.d.). English and Spanish Listeners’ Use of “Positive” Stress cues in Spanish Word Recognition.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Martino, J., Brogna, C., Robles, S. G., Vergani, F., & Duffau, H.
    (2010) Anatomic dissection of the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus revisited in the lights of brain stimulation data. Cortex, 46(5), 691–699. doi:  10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.015 [Google Scholar]
  47. McClelland, J. L.; Elman, J. L.
    (1986) The TRACE Model of Speech Perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86. 10.1016/0010‑0285(86)90015‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0 [Google Scholar]
  48. Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A.
    (1999) Bilingual Language Switching in Naming : Asymmetrical Costs of Language Selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25–40. doi:  10.1006/jmla.1998.2602
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2602 [Google Scholar]
  49. Mirman, D., Dixon, J. a., & Magnuson, J. S.
    (2008) Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 475–494. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mishra, R. K., & Singh, N.
    (2016) The influence of second language proficiency on bilingual parallel language activation in Hindi – English bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5911(April), 1–16. doi:  10.1080/20445911.2016.1146725
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2016.1146725 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mohades, S. G., Struys, E., Van Schuerbeek, P., Mondt, K., Van De Craen, P., & Luypaert, R.
    (2012) DTI reveals structural differences in white matter tracts between bilingual and monolingual children. Brain Research, 1435, 72–80. doi:  10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  52. Monsell, S., Yeung, N., & Azuma, R.
    (2000) Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task?Psychological Research, 63, 250–264. 10.1007/s004269900005
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s004269900005 [Google Scholar]
  53. Perani, D., Abutalebi, J., Paulesu, E., Brambati, S., Scifo, P., Cappa, S. F., & Fazio, F.
    (2003) The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high-proficient bilinguals: An fMRI study during verbal fluency. Human Brain Mapping, 19(3), 170–182. doi:  10.1002/hbm.10110
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10110 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sancier, M. L., & Fowler, C. a.
    (1997) Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 421–436. 10.1006/jpho.1997.0051
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0051 [Google Scholar]
  55. Schulpen, B., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H. J., & Hasper, M.
    (2003) Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance (Vol.29).
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2006) Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language2, 55(2), 197–212. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  57. Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Bienkowski, M.
    (1982) Automatic Access of the Meanings of Ambiguous Words in Context : Some Limitations of Knowledge-Based Processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 489–537. 10.1016/0010‑0285(82)90017‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90017-2 [Google Scholar]
  58. Silverberg, S., & Samuel, A. G.
    (2004) The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(3), 381–398. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  59. Soares, C., & Grosjean, F.
    (1984) Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: the effect on lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 12(4), 380–386. doi:  10.3758/BF03198298
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198298 [Google Scholar]
  60. Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastián-Galles, N., & Cutler, A.
    (2001) Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 412–432. doi:  10.1006/jmla.2000.2783
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2783 [Google Scholar]
  61. Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V.
    (1999) Cross Talk Between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon. Psychological Science, 10(3), 281–284. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9280.00151
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00151 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tagliaferri, B.
    (2005) Paradigm. Perception Research Systems, Inc.Retrieved fromwww.perceptionresearchsystems.com
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I.
    (2011) Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1412–1431. doi:  10.1037/a0024492
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024492 [Google Scholar]
  64. Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N.
    (1996) The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119. doi:  10.1093/applin/17.1.84
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84 [Google Scholar]
  65. Tremblay, A.
    (2008) Is second language lexical access prosodically constrained? Processing of word stress by French Canadian second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 553–584. doi:  10.1017/S0142716408080247
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080247 [Google Scholar]
  66. Tremblay, A., & Ransijn, J.
    (2015) Model selection and post-hoc analysis for (G)LMER Models. R software package.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Weber, A., & Cutler, A.
    (2004) Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 1–25. doi:  10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00105‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00105-0 [Google Scholar]
  68. Weber, A., Melinger, A., Lara Tapia, L.
    (2007) The mapping of phonetic information to lexical representation in Spanish: Evidence from eye movements. InJ. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2007). Dudweiler: Pirrot (pp.1941–1944).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.17023.mar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.17023.mar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: mode; production; stress; comprehension; bilingualism
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error