1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
  4. Volume 9, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 9, Issue 4-5
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Early Spanish-English bilinguals and English controls were tested on the production and perception of negative, short-lag, and long-lag Voice Onset Time (VOT), VOT types spanning the Spanish and English phonetic categories: phonologically, negative and short-lag VOT stops are distinct phonemes in Spanish, but realizations of voiced stops in English. Dominance was critical: more English-dominant bilinguals produced more short-lag VOT stops in response to negative VOT stimuli, and were also less accurate than more balanced bilinguals at discriminating negative from short-lag VOT. Bilinguals performed similarly to monolinguals overall, but they produced more negative VOT tokens and shorter short-lag VOT in response to negative VOT. Their productions were also less well correlated with perception and showed more variation between individuals. These results highlight the variable nature of bilingual production and perception, and demonstrate the need to consider language dominance, individual variation, as well as modalities and tasks when studying bilinguals.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.17027.pic
2019-10-09
2023-09-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lab.17027.pic
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abramson, A. S., & Whalen, D. H.
    (2017) Voice Onset Time (VOT) at 50: Theoretical and practical issues in measuring voicing distinctions. Journal of Phonetics, 63, 75–86. 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.05.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Balukas, C., & Koops, C.
    (2014) Spanish-English bilingual voice onset time in spontaneous code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 423–443. 10.1177/1367006913516035
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913516035 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
    (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beach, E. F., Burnham, D., & Kitamura, C.
    (2001) Bilingualism and the relationship between perception and production: Greek/English bilinguals and Thai bilabial stops. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 5(2), 221–235. 10.1177/13670069010050020501
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069010050020501 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beddor, P.
    (2017) Speech perception in phonetics. Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Retrieved2 Nov. 2017, fromlinguistics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-62. 10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.62
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.62 [Google Scholar]
  6. Best, C. T., & Strange, W.
    (1992) Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20(3), 305–330.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bills, G. D., Chávez, E. H., & Hudson, A.
    (1995) The geography of language shift: Distance from the Mexican border and Spanish language claiming in the Southwestern US. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 114(1), 9–28. 10.1515/ijsl.1995.114.9
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1995.114.9 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cedrus Corporation
    Cedrus Corporation (2011) SuperLab 4.5. San Pedro, CA.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P.
    (1999) Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 207–229. 10.1006/jpho.1999.0094
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0094 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J.
    (1992) The monolingual nature of speech by bilinguals. Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 381–410. 10.1016/0010‑0285(92)90012‑Q
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90012-Q [Google Scholar]
  11. Davidson, L.
    (2016) Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents. Journal of Phonetics, 54, 35–50. 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dmitrieva, O., Llanos, F., Shultz, A. A., & Francis, A. L.
    (2015) Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 77–95. 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.12.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Docherty, G. J.
    (1992) The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Berlin/New York: Foris. 10.1515/9783110872637
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872637 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dum-Tragut, J.
    (2009) Armenian: Modern Eastern Armenian (Vol.14). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/loall.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.14 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dunn, A. L., & Fox Tree, J. E.
    (2009) A quick, gradient Bilingual Dominance Scale. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(3), 273–289. 10.1017/S1366728909990113
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990113 [Google Scholar]
  16. Elman, J. L., Diehl, R. L., & Buchwald, S. E.
    (1977) Perceptual switching in bilinguals. The Journal of the acoustical Society of America, 62(4), 971–974. 10.1121/1.381591
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381591 [Google Scholar]
  17. Flege, J. E.
    (1995) Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.233–273). Timonium, MD: York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W.
    (1987) Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. (1988) Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: Evidence for phonetic category formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(2), 729–40. 10.1121/1.396115
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396115 [Google Scholar]
  20. Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Piske, T.
    (2002) Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 567–598. 10.1017/S0142716402004046
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716402004046 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fowler, C. A., Sramko, V., Ostry, D. J., Rowland, S. A., & Hallé, P.
    (2008) Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French-English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 649–663. 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Green, D. W.
    (1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. 10.1017/S1366728998000133
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133 [Google Scholar]
  23. Grijalva, C., Piccinini, P., & Arvaniti, A.
    (2013) The vowel spaces of Southern California English and Mexican Spanish as produced by monolinguals and bilinguals. POMA (Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics), 19(1), 060088.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Grosjean, F.
    (1989) Neurolinguists beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36, 3–15. 10.1016/0093‑934X(89)90048‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90048-5 [Google Scholar]
  25. (1998) Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 131–149. 10.1017/S136672899800025X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672899800025X [Google Scholar]
  26. (2001) The bilingual’s language modes. InNicol, J. (Ed.). One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp.1–22). Oxford: Blackwell. Also inLi Wei (Ed.). The bilingual reader (2nd edition). London: Routledge 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Keating, P. A.
    (1984) Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language, 60(2), 286–319. 10.2307/413642
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413642 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kessinger, R. H., & Blumstein, S. E.
    (1997) Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 143–168. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0039
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0039 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lengeris, A., & Hazan, V.
    (2011) The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 3757–3768. 10.1121/1.3506351
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3506351 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lipski, J. M.
    (2008) Varieties of Spanish in the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S.
    (1964) A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422. 10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mack, M.
    (1989) Consonant and vowel perception and production: Early English-French bilinguals and English monolinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 46(2), 187–200. 10.3758/BF03204982
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204982 [Google Scholar]
  33. MacKay, I. R., Flege, J. E., Piske, T., & Schirru, C.
    (2001) Category restructuring during second-language speech acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(1), 516–528. 10.1121/1.1377287
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1377287 [Google Scholar]
  34. Magloire, J., & Green, K. P.
    (1999) A cross-language comparison of speaking rate effects on the production of Voice Onset Time in English and Spanish. Phonetica, 56(3–4), 158–185. 10.1159/000028449
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000028449 [Google Scholar]
  35. McGuire, G.
    (2010) A brief primer on experimental designs for speech perception research. Available athttps://people.ucsc.edu/~gmcguir1/experiment_designs.pdf
  36. Nakai, S., & Scobbie, J. M.
    (2016) The VOT category boundary in word-initial stops: Counter-Evidence against rate normalization in English spontaneous speech. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 7(1), 13. 10.5334/labphon.49
     https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.49 [Google Scholar]
  37. Olson, D. J.
    (2013) Bilingual language switching and selection at the phonetic level: Asymmetrical transfer in VOT production. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 407–420. 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.07.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  38. Piccinini, P., & Arvaniti, A.
    (2015) Voice onset time in Spanish – English spontaneous code-switching. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 121–137. 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.07.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pisoni, D.
    (1973) Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception and Psychophysics, 13(2), 253–260. 10.3758/BF03214136
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214136 [Google Scholar]
  40. Raphael, L. J., Borden, G. J., & Harris, K. S.
    (2007) Speech science primer: Physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Stuart-Smith, J., Sonderegger, M., Rathcke, T., & Macdonald, R.
    (2015) The private life of stops: VOT in a real-time corpus of spontaneous Glaswegian. Laboratory Phonology, 6(3–4), 505–549.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Baum, S.
    (2006) Production of coronal stops by simultaneous bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(1), 97–114. 10.1017/S1366728905002403
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728905002403 [Google Scholar]
  43. Theodore, R. M., Miller, J. L., & DeSteno, D.
    (2009) Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time: Contextual influences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(6), 3974–3982. 10.1121/1.3106131
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3106131 [Google Scholar]
  44. Williams, L.
    (1977) The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics, 21(4), 289–297. 10.3758/BF03199477
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199477 [Google Scholar]
  45. Yu, A., Abrego-Collier, C., & Sonderegger, M.
    (2013) Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: Subjective attitude, personality and “autistic” traits. PLOS ONE8(9): e74746. Published: September 30, 2013. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074746
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074746 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.17027.pic
Loading
Dominance, mode, and individual variation in bilingual speech production and perception
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9, 628 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17027.pic
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.17027.pic
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.17027.pic
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bilingualism; English; language dominance; language mode; Spanish; voice onset time

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error