Translation ambiguity in Mandarin-English bilinguals

References

1. Altarriba, J.
   (2003) Does cariño equal “liking”? A theoretical approach to conceptual nonequivalence between languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7, 305–322. 10.1177/13670069030070030501
   https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069030070030501 [Google Scholar]
2. Altarriba, J.
   (2012) Emotion and mood: Over 120 years of contemplation and exploration. American Journal of Psychology, 125, 409–422. 10.5406/amerjpsyc.125.4.0409
   https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.125.4.0409 [Google Scholar]
3. Altarriba, J. , & Basnight-Brown, D. M.
   (2011) The representation of emotion versus emotion-laden words in English and Spanish in the Affective Simon task. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 310–328. 10.1177/1367006910379261
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006910379261 [Google Scholar]
4. Altarriba, J. , & Bauer, L.
   (2004) The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: A comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 389–410. 10.2307/4149007
   https://doi.org/10.2307/4149007 [Google Scholar]
5. Altarriba, J. , Bauer, L. M. , & Benvenuto, C.
   (1999) Concreteness, context-availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 578–602. 10.3758/BF03200738
   https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200738 [Google Scholar]
6. Anderson, J. R.
   (1974) Retrieval of prepositional information from long term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 451–474. 10.1016/0010‑0285(74)90021‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90021-8 [Google Scholar]
7. Bai, L.
   (2015) Emotion categorization and early bilinguals: A study of Chinese-English bilinguals’ understanding of the shame category. Ph.D. dissertation. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Balota, D. A. , Yap, M. J. , Cortese, M. J. , Hutchinson, K. A. , Kessler, B. , Loftis, B. ,
   (2007) The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. 10.3758/BF03193014
   https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014 [Google Scholar]
9. Basnight-Brown, D. M. , & Altarriba, J.
   (2014) Number of translation differences in Spanish and Chinese bilinguals: The difficulty in finding a direct translation for emotion words. In S. Cooper & K. Ratele (Eds.), Psychology serving humanity: Vol. II. (pp.240–251). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Basnight-Brown, D. M. , & Altarriba, J.
    (2016) Multiple translations in bilingual memory: Processing differences across concrete, abstract, and emotion words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45 (5), 1219–1245. 10.1007/s10936‑015‑9400‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9400-4 [Google Scholar]
11. Boada, R. , Sánchez-Casas, R. M. , Gavilán, J. M. , García-Albea, J. E. , & Tokowicz, N.
    (2013) Effect of multiple translations and cognate status on translation recognition performance of balanced bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 183–197. 10.1017/S1366728912000223
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000223 [Google Scholar]
12. Bracken, J. , Degani, T. , Eddington, C. , & Tokowicz, N.
    (2016) Translation semantic variability: How semantic relatedness affects learning of translation-ambiguous words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 783–794. 10.1017/S1366728916000274
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000274 [Google Scholar]
13. Bradley, M. M. , & Lang, P. J.
    (1999) Affective norms for English words (ANEW). Gainesville, FL: The NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, University of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Brysbaert, M. , & New, B.
    (2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 [Google Scholar]
15. Cai, Q. , & Brysbaert, M.
    (2010) SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE5 (6), e10729. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 [Google Scholar]
16. Costa, A. , & Santesteban, M.
    (2004) Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491–511. 10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002 [Google Scholar]
17. Degani, T. , Prior, A. , Eddington, C. M. , Areas da Luz Fontes, A. , & Tokowicz, N.
    (2016) Determinants of translation ambiguity. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6 (3), 29–37.10.1075/lab.14013.deg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.14013.deg [Google Scholar]
18. Degani, T. , Prior, A. , & Tokowicz, N.
    (2011) Bidirectional transfer: The effect of sharing a translation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 18–28. 10.1080/20445911.2011.445986
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.445986 [Google Scholar]
19. Degani, T. , & Tokowicz, N.
    (2010) Ambiguous words are harder to learn. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 299–314. 10.1017/S1366728909990411
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990411 [Google Scholar]
20. Degani, T. , & Tokowicz, N.
    (2013) Cross-language influences: Translation status affects intraword sense relatedness. Memory and Cognition, 41, 1046–1064. 10.3758/s13421‑013‑0322‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0322-9 [Google Scholar]
21. Degani, T. , Tseng, A. M. , & Tokowicz, N.
    (2014) Together or apart: Learning of translation-ambiguous words. Bilingualism: Learning and Cognition, 17, 749–765. 10.1017/S1366728913000837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000837 [Google Scholar]
22. Degani, T. , Prior, A. , Eddington, C. M. , Areas da Luz Fontes, A. B. , & Tokowicz, N.
    (2016) Determinant of translation ambiguity. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6 (3), 290–307. 10.1075/lab.14013.deg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.14013.deg [Google Scholar]
23. Eddington, C. , & Tokowicz, N.
    (2013) Examining English-German translation ambiguity using primed translation recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 442–457. 10.1017/S1366728912000387
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000387 [Google Scholar]
24. Kazanas, S. , & Altarriba, J.
    (2015) The automatic activation of emotion and emotion-laden words: Evidence from a masked and unmasked priming paradigm. American Journal of Psychology, 128, 323–336. 10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.3.0323
    https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.3.0323 [Google Scholar]
25. Knickerbocker, H. , Johnson, R. L. , & Altarriba, J.
    (2015) Emotion effects during reading: Influence of an emotion target word on eye movements and processing. Cognition & Emotion, 29, 784–806. 10.1080/02699931.2014.938023
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.938023 [Google Scholar]
26. Kroll, J. F. , & Stewart, E.
    (1994) Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174. 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 [Google Scholar]
27. Laxén, J. , & Lavaur, J.-M.
    (2010) The role of semantics in translation recognition: Effects of number of translations, dominance of translations and semantic relatedness of multiple translations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 157–183. 10.1017/S1366728909990472
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990472 [Google Scholar]
28. Lin, J. , & Yao, Y.
    (2016) Encoding emotion in Chinese: A database of Chinese emotion words with information of emotion type, intensity, and valence. Lingua Sinica, 2, 1–22. 10.1186/s40655‑016‑0015‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40655-016-0015-y [Google Scholar]
29. Paivio, A.
    (1986) Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pavlenko, A.
    (2005) Emotions and multilingualism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Prior, A. , Kroll, J. F. , & MacWhinney, B.
    (2012) Translation ambiguity but not word class predicts translation performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 458–474. 10.1017/S1366728912000272
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000272 [Google Scholar]
32. Prior, A. , MacWhinney, B. , & Kroll, J. F.
    (2007) Translation norms for English and Spanish: The role of lexical variables, word class, and L2 proficiency in negotiating translation ambiguity. Behavior Research Methods, 39 (4), 1029–1038. 10.3758/BF03193001
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193001 [Google Scholar]
33. Smith, Y. , Walters, J. , & Prior, A.
    (2012) Translation norms for Hebrew and English. Edmond J. Safra Technical Report 2012–1.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Snodgrass, J. G. , & Vanderwart, M.
    (1980) A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 121–174.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Tokowicz, N. , & Kroll, J. F.
    (2007) Number of meanings and concreteness: Consequences of ambiguity within and across languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 727–779. 10.1080/01690960601057068
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960601057068 [Google Scholar]
36. Tokowicz, N. , Kroll, J. F. , de Groot, A. M. B. , & van Hell, J. G.
    (2002) Number of translation norms for Dutch-English translation pairs: A new tool for examining language production. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 435–451. 10.3758/BF03195472
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195472 [Google Scholar]
37. Tseng, A. M. , Chang, L.-Y. , & Tokowicz, N.
    (2014) Translation ambiguity between English and Mandarin Chinese: The role of proficiency. In J. Schwieter & A. Ferreira (Eds.), The development of translation competence: Theories and methodologies from psycholinguistics and cognitive science (pp.107–165). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
38. van Hell, J. G. , & de Groot, A. M. B.
    (1998) Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 193–211. 10.1017/S1366728998000352
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000352 [Google Scholar]
39. Wen, Y. , & van Heuven, W. J.
    (2017) Chinese translation norms for 1,429 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1006–1019. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0761‑x
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0761-x [Google Scholar]
40. Yao, Z. , Wu, J. , Zhang, Y. , & Wang, Z.
    (2017) Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1374–1385. 10.3758/s13428‑016‑0793‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0793-2 [Google Scholar]