1887
image of The acquisition of L3 variation among early bilinguals
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present study investigates whether prior experience with formal study of an L2 influences L3 Korean learners’ Type 1 variation (i.e., use of obligatory forms) and Type 2 variation (i.e., variation between alternative acceptable variants). The patterns of variation in Korean argument realization of early bilingual learners (English-Chinese/Malay/Indonesian/Tamil) of L3 Korean were assessed in light of the distribution of variants present in classroom input, learners’ prior L2 learning experience and home language background, argument animacy and number, and familiarity of verb structure type.

Our findings demonstrate that prior experience with a typologically-similar L2 facilitates acquisition of grammatical patterns as well as acquisition of native-like patterns of variation between grammatical forms that are constrained by a range of internal linguistic factors. Any L2 experience, regardless of typological proximity, is found to facilitate acquisition of internal linguistic constraints, but not acquisition of grammatical patterns.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.17066.par
2019-01-08
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bao, Z.
    (2001) The origins of empty categories in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, 16(2), 275–319. 10.1075/jpcl.16.2.03zhi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.16.2.03zhi [Google Scholar]
  2. Bardel, C., & Falk, Y.
    (2007) The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23, 459–84. 10.1177/0267658307080557
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307080557 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2012) The L2 status factor and the declarative/procedural distinction. In: Amaro, J. A., Flynn, S. & Rothman, J. (eds.) Third language acquisition in adulthood. Amsterdam; Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 165–194. 10.1075/sibil.46.06bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.46.06bar [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayley, R., & Regan, V.
    (2004) Introduction: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(3), 323–338. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2004.00263.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00263.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Bialystok, E.
    (1988) Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology, 24, 560–567. 10.1037/0012‑1649.24.4.560
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.560 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2001) Metalinguistic Aspects of Bilingual Processing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 169–181. doi:  10.1017/S0267190501000101
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190501000101 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2007) Cognitive effects of bilingualism: How linguistic experience leads to cognitive change. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(3), 210–223. 10.2167/beb441.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/beb441.0 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cenoz, J.
    (2003) The additive effect of bilingualism on third language acquisition: A review. The International journal of bilingualism, 7(1), 71–87. 10.1177/13670069030070010501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069030070010501 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cromdal, J.
    (1999) Childhood bilingualism and metalinguistic skills: Analysis and control in young Swedish-English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(1), 1–20. 10.1017/S0142716499001010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716499001010 [Google Scholar]
  11. Deterding, D.
    (2007) Singapore English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748625444.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748625444.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dewaele, J.-M.
    (1998) Lexical inventions: French interlanguage as L2 versus L3. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 471–490. 10.1093/applin/19.4.471
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.471 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dixon, L. Q.
    (2005) Bilingual education policy in Singapore: An analysis of its sociohistorical roots and current academic outcomes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(1), 25–47. 10.1080/jBEB.v8.i1.pg25
    https://doi.org/10.1080/jBEB.v8.i1.pg25 [Google Scholar]
  14. Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I.
    (2004) The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. The International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 3–16. 10.1080/14790710408668175
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710408668175 [Google Scholar]
  15. Flynn, S., & Berkes, É.
    (2017) Toward a new understanding of syntactic CLI: evidence from L2 and L3 acquisition. InT. Angelovska and A. Hahn (eds.), L3 Syntactic Transfer: Models, New Developments and Implications (pp.35–61). Book series: Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, Ed.John W. Schwieter. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bpa.5.03fly
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bpa.5.03fly [Google Scholar]
  16. González, J. M.
    (Ed.) (2008) Encyclopedia of bilingual education (Vols.1–2). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:  10.4135/9781412963985
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963985 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hammarberg, B.
    (2001) Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production. InJ. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp.21–41). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853595509‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853595509-003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jaensch, C.
    (2009) L3 enhanced feature sensitivity as a result of higher proficiency in the L2. InY.-k. I. Leung (eds.) Third Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar, (pp.115–143). Bristol: Multilinguals Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2012) Acquisition of L3 German. In: Amaro, J. A., Flynn, S. & Rothman, J. (eds.) Third language acquisition in adulthood. (pp.165–194). Amsterdam; Philadelphia : John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.46.12jae
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.46.12jae [Google Scholar]
  20. Jessner, U.
    (2006) Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748619139.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748619139.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, J. S. & Newport, E. L.
    (1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99. 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90003‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, T.
    (2008) Subject and object markings in conversational Korean (Doctoral dissertation). The State University of New York, Buffalo.
  23. Kim, Y.-J.
    (2000) Subject/Object drop in the acquisition of Korean: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 9(4), 325–351. 10.1023/A:1008304903779
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008304903779 [Google Scholar]
  24. Klein, E. C.
    (1995) Second versus third language acquisition: Is there a difference?Language Learning, 45(3), 419–466. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00448.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00448.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Labov, W.
    (1963) The social motivation of a sound change. Word, 19, 273–307. 10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1966) The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lambeck, K.
    (1984) Kritische Anmerkungen zur Bilingualismusforschung. T¨ubingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, X.
    (2010) Sociolinguistic variation in the speech of learners of Chinese as a second language: CSL sociolinguistic variation. Language Learning, 60(2), 366–408. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00560.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00560.x [Google Scholar]
  30. MacNab, G.
    (1979) Cognition and bilingualism: a reanalysis of studies, Linguistics, 17, 231–55. 10.1515/ling.1979.17.3‑4.231
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.3-4.231 [Google Scholar]
  31. MacWhinney, B.
    (1987) Applying the competition model to bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8(4), 315–327. doi:  10.1017/S0142716400000357
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400000357 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ministry of Social and Family Development
    Ministry of Social and Family Development (2016) United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Singapore’s fourth and fifth periodic report: Annex C, statistics. Accessed athttps://www.msf.gov.sg/policies/Children-and-Youth/Documents/Singapore%20-%204th%20and%205th%20periodic%20UNCRC%20Report%20-%20Annex%20C%20.pdf
  33. Mougeon, R., Nadasdi, T., & Rehner, K.
    (2010) The sociolinguistic competence of immersion students. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692405
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692405 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mougeon, R., & Rehner, K.
    (2001) Acquisition of sociolinguistic variants by French immersion students: The case of restrictive expressions, and more. Modern Language Journal, 85(3), 398–415. 10.1111/0026‑7902.00116
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00116 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mougeon, R., Rehner, K., & Nadasdi, T.
    (2004) The learning of spoken French variation by immersion students from Toronto, Canada. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(3), 408–432. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2004.00267.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00267.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Park, M., & Starr, R. L.
    (2015) The role of formal L2 learning experience in L3 acquisition among early bilinguals, International Journal of Multilingualism, doi:  10.1080/14790718.2015.1088544
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2015.1088544 [Google Scholar]
  37. Park, M.
    (2016) Third language acquisition among early bilinguals (Doctoral dissertation). National University of Singapore.
  38. Regan, V., Howard, M. & Lemée, I.
    (2009) The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence in a study abroad context. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rothman, J.
    (2011) L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research27(1) 107–127. 10.1177/0267658310386439
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310386439 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the typological primacy model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179. doi:  10.1017/S136672891300059X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891300059X [Google Scholar]
  41. Rothman, J. & Cabrelli, Amaro J.
    (2010) What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state. Second Language Research26: 189–218. 10.1177/0267658309349410
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309349410 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sanz, C.
    (2000) Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(1), 23–44. 10.1017/S0142716400001028
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400001028 [Google Scholar]
  43. Slobin, D. I.
    (1985) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Singapore Department of Statistics
    Singapore Department of Statistics (2015) General Household Survey 2015. Accessed athttps://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/ghs/ghs2015content
  45. Sohn, H. M.
    (1999) The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Starr, R. L.
    (2017) Sociolinguistic variation and acquisition in two-way language immersion: Negotiating the standard. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Thang, L. L.
    (2016) Being a good grandparent: Comparative intergenerational relationships in Japan and Singapore. Lianhe Zaobao3September 2016 Accessed atwww.fas.nus.edu.sg/cfpr/media/images/lhzbcolumn/2016/Sep16E.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Theng, A. J.
    (2016) The multilingual marketplace, proficiencies, and employability in neoliberal Singapore: A sociolinguistic survey of NUS students. National University of Singapore: unpublished B.A. honours thesis.
  49. Thomas, J.
    (1988) The role played by metalinguistic awareness in second and third language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 9(3), 235–246. 10.1080/01434632.1988.9994334
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1988.9994334 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B.
    (2005) Implicit and Explicit Measures of Sensitivity to Violations in Second Language Grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 173. 10.1017/S0272263105050102
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050102 [Google Scholar]
  51. Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y.
    (2017) Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The linguistic proximity model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682. doi:  10.1177/1367006916648859
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916648859 [Google Scholar]
  52. Yamashita, H.
    (1997) The effects of word-order and case marking information on the processing of Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(2), 163–188. doi:  10.1023/A:1025009615473
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025009615473 [Google Scholar]
  53. Yoon, S.-S., & Jeong, H.-J.
    (2015) An analysis of KFL students’ errors of Korean copula i-ta. 언어정보 [Language and Information], 21, 91–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao, S., & Liu, Y.
    (2007) Home language shift and its implications for language planning in Singapore: From the perspective of prestige planning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 16(2), 111–126.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.17066.par
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.17066.par
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: multilingualism; argument realization; variation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error