1887
image of When actions and looks don’t line up
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In two eye tracking experiments, we investigate how adult child-L2 speakers of English resolve prepositional phrase (PP) attachment ambiguity in their dominant language (English), and whether they use prosodic information to aid in the process of garden-path recovery. The findings showed an increased processing cost associated with the revision of temporary ambiguous sentences for the child-L2 adults relative to the native English speakers. When prosody was informative, the child-L2 adults were able to use prosodic information to guide the interpretation of their later acquired, dominant language. However, they performed revision significantly less successfully than the native speakers. Although processing was similar for the native English speakers and the adult child-L2 speakers of English, when it comes to sensitivity to prosodic information and referential context, the two groups differed with regards to reanalysis both in the presence and absence of salient prosodic and referential information.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18001.con
2018-12-17
2019-08-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altmann, G., & Steedman, M.
    (1988) Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191–238. 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90020‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, D. M., & Sarkar, D.
    (2007) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, R package version 0.99875–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M.
    (2013) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39, 129–181. 10.1515/tl‑2013‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bice, K., & Kroll, J. F.
    (2015) Native language change during early stages of second language learning. NeuroReport, 26, 966–971. 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000453
    https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000453 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brito, A. M., & Raposo, E. B. P.
    (2013) Complementos, modificadores e adjuntos no sintagma nominal. InRaposo, E. B. P. (eds.), Gramática do Português I e II. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, pp.1045–1113.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T.
    (2012) Production and processing asymmetries in the acquisition of tense morphology by sequential bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 5–21. 10.1017/S1366728911000368
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000368 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. C.
    (1988) Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73–105. 10.1016/0010‑0277(88)90004‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90004-2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dekydtspotter, L., Donaldson, B., Edmonds, A. C., Fultz, A., & Petrush, R. A.
    (2008) Syntax and prosodic computations in the resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguity by English-French learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 453–480. 10.1017/S0272263108080728
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080728 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B.
    (2002) The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 3–10. 10.1017/S1366728902003012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902003012 [Google Scholar]
  10. Donnelly, S., & Verkuilen, J.
    (2017) Empirical logic analysis is not logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 28–42. 10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dussias, P. E.
    (2003) Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners: Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 529–557. 10.1017/S0272263103000238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000238 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N.
    (2007) The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 101–116. 10.1017/S1366728906002847
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002847 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fine, A. B., Jaeger, T. F., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T.
    (2013) Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. PloS One, 8, e77661. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0077661
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077661 [Google Scholar]
  14. Frazier, L., & Clifton Jr., C.
    (1996) Construal. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K.
    (2011) Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The Frequency-Lag Hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 86–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Grosjean, F.
    (1998) Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149. 10.1017/S136672899800025X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672899800025X [Google Scholar]
  17. Harley, B., Howard, J., & Hart, D.
    (1995) Second language processing at different ages: Do younger learners pay more attention to prosodic cues to sentence structure?Language Learning, 45, 43–71. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00962.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00962.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Henry, N., DiMidio, J., & Jackson, C. N.
    (2017) The role of prosody and explicit instruction in Processing Instruction. Modern Language Journal. doi:  10.1111/modl.12397
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12397 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kroll, J. F., & Bialystok, E.
    (2013) Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 25, 497–514. 10.1080/20445911.2013.799170
    https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.799170 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kroll, J. F., & Dussias, P. E.
    (2017) The benefits of multilingualism to the personal and professional development of residents of the US. Foreign Language Annals, 248–259. 10.1111/flan.12271
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12271 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bogulski, C. A., & Valdés Kroff, J. R.
    (2012) Juggling two languages in one mind: What bilinguals tell us about language processing and its consequences for cognition. InB. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Volume56, (pp.229–273). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑394393‑4.00007‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394393-4.00007-8 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kupisch, T., D. Barton, T. Lein, J. Schröder, I. Stangen & A. Stöhr
    (2014) Acquisition outcomes across domain in adult heritage speakers of French. Journal of French Language Studies, 24(3), 347–376. 10.1017/S0959269513000197
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269513000197 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lein, T., Kupisch, T., & van de Weijer, J.
    (2016) Voice onset time and global foreign accent in German-French simultaneous bilinguals during adulthood. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20, 732–749. 10.1177/1367006915589424
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006915589424 [Google Scholar]
  24. Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G.
    (2009) Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 20, 1507–1515. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2009.02480.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M.
    (2007) The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 940–967. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2007/067)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067) [Google Scholar]
  26. Marian, V., & Spivey, M.
    (2003) Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 97–115. 10.1017/S1366728903001068
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001068 [Google Scholar]
  27. Montrul, S.
    (2008a) Second language acquisition welcomes the heritage language learner: opportunities of a new field. Second Language Research, 24, 487–506. 10.1177/0267658308095738
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308095738 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2008b) Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism. Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.39
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.39 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2015) The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C. & Thompson-Schill, S.
    (2005) Cognitive control and parsing: Re-examining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(3), 263–28. 10.3758/CABN.5.3.263
    https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.3.263 [Google Scholar]
  31. O’Grady, W., Lee, M., & Choo, M.
    (2001) The acquisition of relative clauses by heritage and non-heritage learners of Korean as a second language: A comparative study. Journal of Korean Language Education, 12, 283–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pan, H.-Y., S. Schimke & C. Felser
    (2015) Referential context effects in non-native relative clause ambiguity resolution. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(3), 298–313. 10.1177/1367006913515769
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913515769 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pascual y Cabo, D., & Rothman, J.
    (2012) The (Il) logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied linguistics, 33, 450–455. 10.1093/applin/ams037
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams037 [Google Scholar]
  34. Polinski, M.
    (2011) Reanalysis in adult heritage language: A case for attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 305–328. 10.1017/S027226311000077X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311000077X [Google Scholar]
  35. Polinsky, M., & Kagan, O.
    (2007) Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 368–95. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00022.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00022.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C.
    (2016) Second language processing and revision of garden-path sentences: a visual word study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 636–643. 10.1017/S1366728915000838
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000838 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rigau, G.
    (1999) La estructura del sintagma nominal: Los modificadores del nombre. InI. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramatica descriptiva de la lengua espanola, (pp.311–362). Madrid: Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Rothman, J.
    (2009) Understanding the Nature and Outcomes of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage Languages International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 145–155.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C.
    (2004) The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing, Cognitive Psychology, 49, 238–299. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Snedeker, J., & Yuan, S.
    (2008) The role of prosodic and lexical constraints in parsing in young children (and adults). Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 574–608. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sorace, A.
    (2011) Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33. 10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor [Google Scholar]
  42. Schwartz, B. D.
    (2004) On child L2 development of syntax and morphology. Lingue e Linguaggio, 3, 97–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Trueswell, J., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. & Logrip, M.
    (1999) The kindergarden-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89–134. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00032‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3 [Google Scholar]
  44. Unsworth, S.
    (2007) Child L2, adult L2, child L1: Differences and similarities. A study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch. Language Acquisition, 14, 215–217. 10.1080/10489220701353891
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220701353891 [Google Scholar]
  45. Valdés, G.
    (2005) Bilingualism, heritage learners, and SLA research: Opportunities lost or seized?Modern Language Journal, 89, 410–426. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2005.00314.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00314.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Weber, A., & Cutler, A.
    (2004) Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 1–25. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00105‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00105-0 [Google Scholar]
  47. Woodard, K., Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J.
    (2016) Taking your own path: Individual differences in Executive Function and Language Processing Skills in Child Learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 187–209. 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Zeidan, C., Nakamura, M., & Rossi, E.
    (2016) Sentence comprehension of ambiguous sentences in younger and older adults. Poster presented at theUndergraduate Conference, CalPoly University, Pomona.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18001.con
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18001.con
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error