Cross-linguistic influence in the development of null arguments in early successive bilingual acquisition

References

1. Ariel, M.
   (1990) Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Campbell, A., Brooks, P. & Tomasello, M.
   (2000) Factors affecting young children’s use of pronouns as referring expressions. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research43, 1337–1349. 10.1044/jslhr.4306.1337
   https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4306.1337 [Google Scholar]
3. Clahsen, H.
   (1991) Constraints on parameter setting: A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language. Language Acquisition, 1, 361–391. 10.1207/s15327817la0104_3
   https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0104_3 [Google Scholar]
4. Costa, J., & Lobo, M.
   (2007) Clitic omission, null objects or both in the acquisition of European Portuguese?InS. Baauw, F. Drijkonongen & M. Pinto (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, pp.59–72. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Costa, J., Lobo, M., & Silva, C.
   (2012) Which category replaces an omitted clitic? The case of European Portuguese. InP. Larranaga, & P. Guijarro-Fuentes (Eds.), Pronouns and clitics in early language, pp.105–129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110238815.105
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238815.105 [Google Scholar]
6. Deuchar, M.
   (2016) Cross-language effects in bilingual production and comprehension: some novel findings. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition19, 706–709. 10.1017/S136672891600050X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891600050X [Google Scholar]
7. Erteschik-Shir, N., Ibnbari, L., & Taube, S.
   (2013) Missing objects as topic drop. Lingua, 136, 145–169. 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.009 [Google Scholar]
8. Grüter, T., & Crago, M.
   (2012) Object clitics and their omission in child L2 French: The contributions of processing limitations and L1 transfer. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition15, 531–549. 10.1017/S1366728911000113
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000113 [Google Scholar]
9. Hamann, C.
   (1996) Null Arguments in German Child Language. Language Acquisition, 5, 155–208. 10.1207/s15327817la0503_1
   https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0503_1 [Google Scholar]
10. Huang, C.-T. J.
    (1984) On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531–574.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hyams, N.
    (1992) A reanalysis of null subjects in child language. InJ. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck, & T. Roeper (Eds.), Theoretical issues in language acquisition: Continuity and change in development, pp.249–267. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kupisch, T.
    (2007) Determiners in bilingual German – Italian children: What they tell us about the relation between language influence and language dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 57–78. 10.1017/S1366728906002823
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002823 [Google Scholar]
13. Meisel, J. M.
    (2011) First and second language acquisition: Parallels and Differences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511862694
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511862694 [Google Scholar]
14. Müller, N., & Hulk, A.
    (2001) Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 1–21. 10.1017/S1366728901000116
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728901000116 [Google Scholar]
15. Mykhaylyk, R. & Sopata, A.
    (2016) Object pronouns, clitics, and omissions in child Polish and Ukrainian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 1051–1082. 10.1017/S0142716415000351
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000351 [Google Scholar]
16. Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Pirvulescu, M., & Roberge, Y.
    (2008) Null Objects in Child Language: Syntax and the Lexicon. Lingua, 118, 370–398. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.07.002 [Google Scholar]
17. Pirvulescu, M., Perez-Leroux, A., Roberge, Y., Strik, N., & Thomas, D.
    (2014) Bilingual effects: Exploring object omission in pronominal languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 495–510. 10.1017/S1366728913000631
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000631 [Google Scholar]
18. Rothman, J.
    (2009) Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 951–973. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.07.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.07.007 [Google Scholar]
19. Ruppenhofer, J.
    (2018) Anaphoric omissions in multiple German corpora. InH. C. Boas & A. Ziem (Eds.), Constructional approaches to argument structure in German, pp.204–242. Berlin: Mouton DeGruyter. 10.1515/9783110457155‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110457155-006 [Google Scholar]
20. Schaeffer, J.
    (2000) The Acquisition of Direct Object Scrambling and Clitic Placement: Syntax and Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.22 [Google Scholar]
21. Schmitz, K., Patuto, M. & Müller, N.
    (2012) The null-subject parameter at the interface between syntax and pragmatics: Evidence from bilingual German–Italian, German–French and Italian–French children. First Language, 32, 205–238. 10.1177/0142723711403880
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723711403880 [Google Scholar]
22. Sigurðsson, H. A.
    (2011) Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry, 42, 267–304. 10.1162/LING_a_00042
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00042 [Google Scholar]
23. Sigurðsson, H. A.
    (2014) Context-linked grammar. Language Sciences, 46, 175–188. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.010 [Google Scholar]
24. Sopata
    Sopata (2016) Null objects in adult and child Polish: Syntax, discourse and pragmatics. Lingua, 183, 86–106. 10.1016/j.lingua.2016.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.05.007 [Google Scholar]
25. Tsimpli, I. M.
    (2014) Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4, 283–313. 10.1075/lab.4.3.01tsi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.3.01tsi [Google Scholar]
26. Weist, R. M. & Witkowska-Stadnik, K.
    (1986) Basic relations in child language and the word order myth. International Journal of Psychology21, 363–381. 10.1080/00207598608247595
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598608247595 [Google Scholar]
27. Witkoś, J.
    (1998) The syntax of clitics: Steps towards a Minimalist Account. Poznań: Motivex.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Yip, V., & Matthews, S.
    (2000) Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese–English bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 193–208. 10.1017/S136672890000033X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890000033X [Google Scholar]