1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
  4. Volume 10, Issue 6
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present study describes the results of two experiments that analyze the effects of language dominance on Catalan/Spanish bilingual speech production. We examined the acoustics of the Catalan [a]~[ə] alternation (a phonological process induced by lexical stress) and of the Catalan mid vowel contrasts /e/-/ɛ/ and /o/-/ɔ/ (two phonemic contrasts) in the speech of Catalan- vs. Spanish-dominant early Catalan/Spanish bilinguals from Majorca (Spain). The results indicate that, contrary to the analysis of the Catalan mid vowels, stressed and unstressed Spanish and Catalan /a/ yielded no significant difference as a function of language dominance. These findings suggest that unstressed vowel reduction, a phonological process, may be relatively easier to acquire than phonemic contrasts with a low functional load (/e/-/ɛ/, /o/-/ɔ/), perhaps because its predictability and high frequency may attract attention and/or relieve cognitive resources, which could be conducive to phonological learning. These findings demonstrate that language dominance effects in the production of phonemic contrasts, widely researched in the literature on early bilingualism, do not guarantee the same effects on the implementation of phonological processes.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18042.ame
2019-07-16
2024-09-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lab.18042.ame
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amengual, M.
    (2012) Interlingual influence in bilingual speech: Cognate status effect in a continuum of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 517–530. 10.1017/S1366728911000460
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000460 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2016a) Cross-linguistic influence in the bilingual mental lexicon: Evidence of cognate effects in the phonetic production and processing of a vowel contrast. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 617. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00617
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00617 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2016b) The perception and production of language-specific mid-vowel contrasts: Shifting the focus to the bilingual individual in early language input conditions. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20, 133–152. 10.1177/1367006914544988
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006914544988 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2016c) The perception of language-specific phonetic categories does not guarantee accurate phonological representations in the lexicon of early bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 1221–1251. 10.1017/S0142716415000557
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000557 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2018) Asymmetrical interlingual influence in the production of Spanish and English laterals as a result of competing activation in bilingual language processing. Journal of Phonetics, 69, 12–28. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  6. Amengual, M. , & Chamorro, P.
    (2015) The effects of language dominance in the perception and production of the Galician mid vowel contrasts. Phonetica, 72, 207–236. 10.1159/000439406
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000439406 [Google Scholar]
  7. Best, C. T. , & Tyler, M. D.
    (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O.-S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp.13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  8. Birdsong, D.
    (2014) Dominance and age in bilingualism. Applied Linguistics, 35, 374–392. 10.1093/applin/amu031
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu031 [Google Scholar]
  9. Birdsong, D. , Gertken, L. M. , & Amengual, M.
    (2012) Bilingual language profile: An easy-to-use instrument to assess bilingualism. COERLL, University of Texas at Austin.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Boersma, P.
    (2001) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cromdal, J.
    (1999) Childhood bilingualism and metalinguistic skills: Analysis and control in young Swedish-English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 1–20. 10.1017/S0142716499001010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716499001010 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cumming, G.
    (2014) The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29. 10.1177/0956797613504966
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dmitrieva, O. , Jongman, A. , & Sereno, J.
    (2010) Phonological neutralization by native and non-native speakers: The case of Russian final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 483–492. 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.06.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dunn, A. L. , & Fox Tree, J. E.
    (2009) A quick, gradient Bilingual Dominance Scale. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 273–289. 10.1017/S1366728909990113
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990113 [Google Scholar]
  15. Escudero, P.
    (2005) Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Utrecht University the Netherlands.
  16. Escudero, P. , & Vasiliev, P.
    (2011) Cross-language acoustic similarity predicts perceptual assimilation of Canadian English and Canadian French vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, EL277–EL283. 10.1121/1.3632043
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3632043 [Google Scholar]
  17. Flege, J. E.
    (1995) Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp.229–273). Timonium, Maryland: York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Flege, J. E. , & Bohn, O.-S.
    (1989) An instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 35–62. 10.1017/S0272263100007828
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100007828 [Google Scholar]
  19. Flege, J. E. , MacKay, I. R. A. , & Piske, T.
    (2002) Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 567–598. 10.1017/S0142716402004046
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716402004046 [Google Scholar]
  20. Flege, J. E. , Schirru, C. , & Mackay, I. R.
    (2003) Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 40(4), 467–491. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(02)00128‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00128-0 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fourakis, M.
    (1991) Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 1816–1827. 10.1121/1.401662
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.401662 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gollan, T. H. , Weissberger, G. H. , Runnqvist, E. , Montoya, R. I. , & Cera, C. M.
    (2012) Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A multilingual Naming Test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 594–615. 10.1017/S1366728911000332
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000332 [Google Scholar]
  23. Grosjean, F.
    (1989) Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36, 3–15. 10.1016/0093‑934X(89)90048‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90048-5 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hazan, V. , & Boulakia, G.
    (1993) Perception and production of a voicing contrast by French-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 36, 17–38. 10.1177/002383099303600102
     https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099303600102 [Google Scholar]
  25. Herrick, D.
    (2003) An acoustic analysis of phonological vowel reduction in six varieties of Catalan. University of California, Santa Cruz.
  26. Jarvis, S. , & Pavlenko, A.
    (2008) Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203935927
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935927 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kharlamov, V.
    (2014) Incomplete neutralization of the voicing contrast in word-final obstruents in Russian: Phonological, lexical, and methodological influences. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 47–56. 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kupisch, T. , Lein, T. , Barton, D. , Schröder, D. J. , Stangen, I. , & Stoehr, A.
    (2014) Acquisition outcomes across domains in adult simultaneous bilinguals with French as weaker and stronger language. Journal of French Language Studies, 24(3), 347–376. 10.1017/S0959269513000197
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269513000197 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lakens, D.
    (2013) Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lawrence, M. A.
    (2016) Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments (Version 4.4-0). Retrieved fromhttps://github.com/mike-lawrence/ez
  31. Lee, B. , Guion, S. G. , & Harada, T.
    (2006) Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 487–513. 10.1017/S0272263106060207
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060207 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lim, V. P. C. , Rickard Liow, S. J. , Lincoln, M. , Chan, Y. K. , & Onslow, M.
    (2008) Determining language dominance in English-Mandarin bilinguals: Development of a self-report classification tool for clinical use. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 389–412. 10.1017/S0142716408080181
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080181 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lleó, C. , Cortés, S. , & Benet, A.
    (2008) Contact-induced phonological changes in the Catalan spoken in Barcelona. In P. Siemund & N. Kintana (Eds.), Language contact and contact languages (Vol.7, pp.185–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/hsm.7.11lle
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.7.11lle [Google Scholar]
  34. Llompart, M. , & Simonet, M.
    (2017) Unstressed vowel reduction across Majorcan Catalan dialects: Production and spoken word recognition. Language and Speech, 1–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Marian, V. , Blumenfeld, H. , & Kaushanskaya, M.
    (2007) The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2007/067)
     https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067) [Google Scholar]
  36. Miller, J.
    (1981) Effects of speaking rate on segmental distinctions. In P. Eimas & J. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on the study of speech (pp.39–74). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Nadeu, M. , & Renwick, M. E. L.
    (2016) Variation in the lexical distribution and implementation of phonetically similar phonemes in Catalan. Journal of Phonetics, 58, 22–47. 10.1016/j.wocn.2016.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  38. Padgett, J. , & Tabain, M.
    (2005) Adaptive dispersion theory and phonological vowel reduction in Russian. Phonetica, 62, 14–54. 10.1159/000087223
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000087223 [Google Scholar]
  39. Piske, T. , MacKay, I. R. A. , & Flege, J. E.
    (2001) Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0134
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0134 [Google Scholar]
  40. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.4.2). Vienna, Austria. Retrieved fromwww.R-project.org/
  41. Ramírez, M. , & Simonet, M.
    (2018) Language dominance and the perception of the Majorcan Catalan /ʎ/–/ʒ/ contrast: Asymmetrical phonological representations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(6), 638–652. 10.1177/1367006916688334
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916688334 [Google Scholar]
  42. Renwick, M. E. L. , & Ladd, D. R.
    (2016) Phonetic distinctiveness vs. lexical contrastiveness in non-robust phonemic contrasts. Laboratory Phonology, 7, 1–19. 10.5334/labphon.17
     https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.17 [Google Scholar]
  43. Renwick, M. E. L. , & Nadeu, M.
    (2018) A survey of phonological mid-vowel intuitions in Central Catalan. Language & Speech, 1–41. doi:  10.1177/0023830917749275. Published online bySAGE journals, January9 2018
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830917749275 [Google Scholar]
  44. Roettger, T. B. , Winter, B. , Grawunder, S. , Kirby, J. , & Grice, M.
    (2014) Assessing incomplete neutralization of final devoicing in German. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 11–25. 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.01.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sebastián-Gallés, N. , Echeverría, S. , & Bosch, L.
    (2005) The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 240–255. 10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Simonet, M.
    (2010a) Alveolar laterals in Majorcan Spanish: Effects of contact with Catalan?In S. Colina , A. Olarrea , & A. M. Carvalho (Eds.), Romance Linguistics 2009 (pp.81–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/cilt.315.05sim
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.315.05sim [Google Scholar]
  47. (2010b) Dark and clear laterals in Catalan and Spanish: Interaction of phonetic categories in early bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 663–678. 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2011a) Intonational convergence in language contact: Utterance-final F0 contours in Catalan-Spanish early bilinguals. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41, 157–184. 10.1017/S0025100311000120
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100311000120 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2011b) Production of a Catalan-specific vowel contrast by early Catalan/Spanish bilinguals. Phonetica, 68, 88–110. 10.1159/000328847
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000328847 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2014) Phonetic consequences of dynamic cross-linguistic interference in proficient bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 26–37. 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.01.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2016) The phonetics and phonology of bilingualism. InOxford Handbooks Online: Scholarly Research Reviews (pp.1–25). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.72
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.72 [Google Scholar]
  52. Smith, B. L. , Hayes-Harb, R. , Bruss, M. , & Harker, A.
    (2009) Production and perception of voicing and devoicing in similar German and English word pairs by native speakers of German. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 257–275. 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Stevens, S. S. , Volkmann, J. , & Newman, E. B.
    (1937) A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude pitch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 8, 185–190. 10.1121/1.1915893
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1915893 [Google Scholar]
  54. Talamas, A. , Kroll, J. , & Dufour, R.
    (1999) From form to meaning: Stages in the acquisition of second-language vocabulary. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 45–58. 10.1017/S1366728999000140
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728999000140 [Google Scholar]
  55. Tamamaki, K.
    (1993) Language dominance in bilinguals’ arithmetic operations according to their language use. Language Learning, 43, 239–261. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1992.tb00716.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb00716.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Tomé Lourido, G. , & Evans, B. G.
    (2019) The effects of language dominance switch in bilinguals: Galician new speakers’ speech production and perception. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(3), 637–654. 10.1017/S1366728918000603
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000603 [Google Scholar]
  57. Torchiano, M.
    (2017) Effsize: A collection of functions to compute the standardized effects sizes for experiments (Version 0.7.1). Retrieved fromhttps://github.com/mtorchiano/effsize/
  58. Wheeler, M.
    (2005) The Phonology of Catalan. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18042.ame
Loading
Language dominance does not always predict cross-linguistic interactions in bilingual speech production
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10, 847 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18042.ame
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18042.ame
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18042.ame
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bilingual speech production; language dominance; phonemic contrasts; phonological processes; unstressed vowel reduction

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error