Volume 8, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ambridge, B., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M.
    (2006) The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract syntactic construction. Cognitive Development, 21(2), 174–193. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, R.
    (1973) A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674732469
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 [Google Scholar]
  3. Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N.
    (2016) Creating language: integrating evolution, acquisition, and processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034319.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034319.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellis, N. C.
    (2006) Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 1–24. 10.1093/applin/ami038
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami038 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2016) Cognition, corpora, and computing: triangulating research in usage-based language learning. Language Learning, 67(51), 40–65. 10.1111/lang.12215
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12215 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B.
    (2016) Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gries, St. Th
    (2008) Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437. 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02gri [Google Scholar]
  8. (2018) Operationalizations of domain-general mechanisms cognitive linguists often rely on: a perspective from quantitative corpus linguistics. InS. Engelberg, H. Lobin, K. Steyer, & S. Wolfer (Eds.), Wortschätze: Dynamik, Muster, Komplexität (pp.75–90). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110579963‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110579963-005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gries, St. Th. & Ellis, N. C.
    (2015) Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65(Supplement 1), 1–28. 10.1111/lang.12119
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12119 [Google Scholar]
  10. Pine, J. M., Freudental, D., Krajewskyi, G., & Gobet, F.
    (2013) Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner. Cognition, 127(3), 345–360. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith, N. J. & Levy, R.
    (2013) The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302–319. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013 [Google Scholar]
  12. Tomasello, M. & Stahl, D.
    (2004) Sampling children’s spontaneous speech: how much is enough?Journal of Child Language, 31(1), 101–121. 10.1017/S0305000903005944
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005944 [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, C.
    (2018) A formalist perspective on language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 665–706. 10.1075/lab.18014.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18014.yan [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error