1887
image of Online processing and offline judgments of L2-English articles
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines L1-Korean speakers’ online processing and offline judgments of L2-English articles using a self-paced task (SPRT) targeting implicit knowledge and an untimed acceptability judgment task (AJT) assessing explicit knowledge. SPRT results indicate that L1-Korean speakers exhibited targetlike online sensitivity to (in)appropriate use of articles, which provides evidence against the claim that L2-specific morphosyntactic structures cannot be utilized during online comprehension ( ). However, the same L2 speakers showed non-targetlike judgment patterns in the AJT. The discrepancy between online and offline performance is discussed in terms of the role of task effects on L2 performance and the development of implicit and explicit knowledge for L2 articles in the acquisition process. Methodological considerations for evaluating L2 knowledge are also discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18053.cho
2020-10-06
2021-05-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:  10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  2. Cho, J.
    (2017) The acquisition of different types of definite noun phrases in L2-English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(3), 367–382. 10.1177/1367006916629577
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916629577 [Google Scholar]
  3. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C.
    (2006) How native-like is non-native language processing?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 564–570. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  4. Clifton, Jr., C.
    (2013) Situational context affects definiteness preferences: Accommodation of presuppositions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 487–501.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Crain, K., & Nash, H.
    (2011) The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 51–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Crawley, M. J.
    (2007) The R book. Chichester: Wiley. 10.1002/9780470515075
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470515075 [Google Scholar]
  7. DeKeyser, R.
    (2003) Implicit and explicit learning. InC. Doughty, & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.313–348). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch11
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dell, G. S., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R.
    (1983) The activation of antecedent information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 121–132. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(83)80010‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80010-3 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dienes, Z., & Perner, J.
    (1999) A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(5), 735–808. 10.1017/S0140525X99002186
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002186 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, N. C.
    (1994) Implicit and explicit language learning. InN. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp.79–114). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellis, R.
    (2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172. 10.1017/S0272263105050096
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2006) Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied linguistics, 27(3), 431–463. 10.1093/applin/aml022
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml022 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2009) Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C.
    (1986) The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–368. 10.1016/0749‑596X(86)90006‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., Park, J.-H., Gass, S., & Ellis, R.
    (2015) Timed and untimed grammaticality judgments measure distinct types of knowledge: Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(2), 269–297. doi:  10.1017/S0272263114000850
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000850 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hawkins, J.
    (1978) Definiteness and indefiniteness. London, UK: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1991) On (in)definite articles: implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 405–442. 10.1017/S0022226700012731
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012731 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hopp, H.
    (2006) Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22(3), 369–397. 10.1191/0267658306sr272oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr272oa [Google Scholar]
  19. (2009) The syntax–discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Offline and on-line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(4), 463–483. 10.1017/S1366728909990253
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990253 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2010) Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120(4), 901–931. 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  21. Huebner, T.
    (1983) A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hulstijn, J., & De Graaff, R.
    (1994) Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. Aila Review, 11, 97–112.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ionin, T., Choi, S. H., & Liu, Q.
    (2019) Knowledge of indefinite articles in L2-English: Online vs. offline performance. Second Language Research. doi:  10.1177/0267658319857466. Published online by SAGE journals, June24 2019.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319857466 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K.
    (2004) Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12(1), 3–69. 10.1207/s15327817la1201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jiang, N.
    (2004) Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(4), 603–634. 10.1017/S0142716404001298
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001298 [Google Scholar]
  26. (2007) Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language learning, 57(1), 1–33. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2007.00397.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00397.x [Google Scholar]
  27. (2012) Conducting reaction time research in second language studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X.
    (2011) Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, 61(3), 940–967. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00627.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00627.x [Google Scholar]
  29. Just, M., Woolley, J., & Carpenter, P.
    (1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 111(2), 228–238. 10.1037/0096‑3445.111.2.228
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuznetsova, A., Bruun Brockhoff, P., & Haubo Bojesen Christensen, R.
    (2016) lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-33. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
  31. Leal, T.
    (2018) Data analysis and sampling. InA. Gudmestad, & A. Edmonds (Eds.), Critical reflections on data in second language acquisition (pp.63–88). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.51.04lea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.51.04lea [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu, D., & Gleason, J. L.
    (2002) Acquisition of the article the by non-native speakers of English: An analysis of four non-generic uses. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(1), 1–26. 10.1017/S0272263102001018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102001018 [Google Scholar]
  33. Loewen, S.
    (2009) Grammaticality judgment tests and the measurement of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. InR. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, H. Reinders, R. Erlam, & J. Philip (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp.94–112). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691767‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691767-006 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lyons, C.
    (1999) Definiteness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
  35. Murphy, G.
    (1984) Establishing and accessing referents in discourse. Memory & Cognition, 12(5), 489–497. doi:  10.3758/BF03198311
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198311 [Google Scholar]
  36. Murphy, S.
    (1997) Knowledge and production of English articles by advanced second language learners. Doctoral dissertation. University of TexasatAustin.
  37. Orfitelli, R., & Polinsky, M.
    (2017) When performance masquerades as comprehension: Grammaticality judgments in non-native speakers. InM. Kopotev, O. Lyashevskaya & A. Mustajoki, (Eds.), Quantitative approaches to the Russian language (pp.197–214). New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315105048‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105048-10 [Google Scholar]
  38. Rebuschat, P.
    (2013) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63(3), 595–626. 10.1111/lang.12010
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12010 [Google Scholar]
  39. Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P.
    (2008) On-line pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 333–357. 10.1017/S0272263108080480
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080480 [Google Scholar]
  40. Robertson, D.
    (2000) Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16(2), 135–72. 10.1191/026765800672262975
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765800672262975 [Google Scholar]
  41. Snape, N.
    (2008) Resetting the Nominal Mapping Parameter in L2 English: Definite article use and the count–mass distinction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 63–79. 10.1017/S1366728907003215
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003215 [Google Scholar]
  42. Snape, N., & Yusa, N.
    (2013) Explicit article instruction in definiteness, specificity, genericity and perception. InM. Whong, K. H. Gil, & H. Marsden (Eds.), Universal Grammar and the second language classroom (pp.161–183). Dordrecht, Germany: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑6362‑3_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3_9 [Google Scholar]
  43. Spinner, P., & Gass, S. M.
    (2019) Using judgments in second language acquisition research. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315463377
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315463377 [Google Scholar]
  44. Thomas, M.
    (1989) The acquisition of English articles by first- and second-language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10(3), 335–355. 10.1017/S0142716400008663
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400008663 [Google Scholar]
  45. Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B.
    (2005) Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 173–204. 10.1017/S0272263105050102
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050102 [Google Scholar]
  46. Trenkic, D.
    (2007) Variability in second language article production: Beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, 23(3), 289–327. 10.1177/0267658307077643
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307077643 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2008) The representation of English articles in second language grammars: Determiners or adjectives?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 1–18. 10.1017/S1366728907003185
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728907003185 [Google Scholar]
  48. Trenkic, D., Mirkovic, J., & Altmann, G.
    (2014) Real-time grammar processing by native and non-native speakers: Constructions unique to the second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 237–257. 10.1017/S1366728913000321
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000321 [Google Scholar]
  49. Umeda, M., Snape, N., Yusa, N., & Wiltshier, J.
    (2017) The long-term effect of explicit instruction on learners’ knowledge on English articles. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 179–199. 10.1177/1362168817739648
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817739648 [Google Scholar]
  50. Vafaee, P., Suzuki, Y., & Kachisnke, I.
    (2017) Validating grammaticality judgment tests: Evidence from two new psycholinguistic measures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 59–95. 10.1017/S0272263115000455
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000455 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vafaee, P., & Kachinske, I.
    (2019) The inadequate use of confirmatory factor analysis in second language acquisition validation studies. Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 19(2), 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Zufferey, S., Mak, W., Degand, L., & Sanders, T.
    (2015) Advanced learners’ comprehension of discourse connectives: The role of L1 transfer across on-line and off-line tasks. Second Language Research, 31(3), 389–411. 10.1177/0267658315573349
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315573349 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18053.cho
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18053.cho
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error