1887
Volume 8, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18056.row
2018-11-26
2024-12-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fernald, A., Perfors, A., & Marchman, V. A.
    (2006) Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 98–116. doi:  10.1037/0012‑1649.42.1.98
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.98 [Google Scholar]
  2. Lakatos, I.
    (1978) The methodology of scientific research programmes. InJ. Worrall & E. Currie (Eds.), Philosophical papers ; vol. 1 (p.viii, 250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Meylan, S. C., Frank, M. C., Roy, B. C., & Levy, R.
    (2017) The emergence of an abstract grammatical category in children’s early speech. Psychological Science, 28(2), 181–192. doi:  10.1177/0956797616677753
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616677753 [Google Scholar]
  4. Monaghan, P., & Rowland, C. F.
    (2017) Combining language corpora with experimental and computational approaches for language acquisition research. Language Learning, 67, 14–39. doi:  10.1111/lang.12221
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12221 [Google Scholar]
  5. Pine, J. M., & Martindale, H.
    (1996) Syntactic categories in the speech of young children: The case of the determiner. Journal of Child Language, 23(2), 369–95. doi:  10.1017/S0305000900008849
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900008849 [Google Scholar]
  6. Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. M.
    (1997) Slot and frame patterns and the development of the determiner category. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18(02), 123–138. doi:  10.1017/S0142716400009930
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400009930 [Google Scholar]
  7. Pine, J. M., Freudenthal, D., Krajewski, G., & Gobet, F.
    (2013) Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf’s law and the case of the determiner. Cognition, 127(3), 345–360. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  8. Pinker, S.
    (1984) Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.1007/s13398‑014‑0173‑7.2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
  9. Popper, K. R.
    (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1974) The philosophy of Karl Popper. (P. A. Schilpp, Ed.). La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publisher.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Thornton, S.
    (2017) Karl Popper. InE. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University. Retrieved fromhttps://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/popper/
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yang, C. D.
    (2002) Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2013) Ontogeny and phylogeny of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(16), 6324–6327. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1216803110
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216803110 [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang, C.
    (2018) A formalist perspective on language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism8(6), 665–706.. 10.1075/lab.18014.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18014.yan [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18056.row
Loading
  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error