1887
Volume 8, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Less is More, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/lab.18080.bib-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18080.bib
2018-11-26
2019-11-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biberauer, T.
    (2017) Factors 2 and 3: a principled approach. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics10: 38–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2005) Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry36, 1–22. 10.1162/0024389052993655
    https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655 [Google Scholar]
  4. Gervain, J. & Werker, J.
    (2008) How infant speech perception contributes to language acquisition. Language and Linguistics Compass2(6), 1149–1170. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00089.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00089.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Kidd, C., Piatandosi, S. & Aslin, R.
    (2012) The Goldilocks Effect: human infants allocate attention to visual sequences that are neither too simple nor too complex. PLoS ONE7(5), e36399. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036399
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036399 [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang, C.
    (2004) Universal Grammar, statistics, or both?Trends in Cognitive Science10, 451–456. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2018) A formalist perspective on language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism6(6), 665–706. 10.1075/lab.18014.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18014.yan [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.18080.bib
Loading
  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error