Grammar acquisition and grammar choice in the variationist model

References

1. Amaral, L., & T. Roeper
   (2014) Multiple grammars and second language representation. Second Language Research, 30(1), 3–36. 10.1177/0267658313519017
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313519017 [Google Scholar]
2. Bauker, L.
   (2015) Content matching in idiom and compounds. A comparative analysis. Paper presented atBCGL8 Grammar and Idioms, Brussels.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chomsky, N.
   (1986) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Hyams, N.
   (2011) Missing Subjects in Early child Language, inJ. De Villiers and T. Roeper (Eds.), Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition, Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑1688‑9_2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1688-9_2 [Google Scholar]
5. Hyams, N., Mateu, V., Orfitelli, R., Putnam, M., Rothman, J., & Sánchez, L.
   (2015) Parameters in language acquisition and language contact. InFábregas, A., Mateu, J., & Putnam, M. (Eds.) (2015) Contemporary Linguistic Parameters. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Kupisch, T.
   (2006) The acquisition of determiners in bilingual German-Italian and German-French children (Doctoral dissertation). Hamburg University, Hamburg.
7. Perez, A., M. Pirvulescu, & Y. Roberge
   (2018) Direct objects and language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139086264
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139086264 [Google Scholar]
8. Rizzi, L.
   (2005) Grammatically-based target-inconsistencies in child language. InDeen, K., Nomujra, J., Schultz, B. and Schwartz, B. D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the inaugural conference on generative accproaches to language acquisition – North America (GALANA). Cambridge, MA, UCONN / MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Roberts, I.
   (2012) Macroparameters and minimalism: A programme for comparative research. InC. Galves, S. Cuyrinom, R. Lopes, F. Sandolo, & J. Avelar (Eds.), Parameter theory and linguistic change (pp.320–369). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0017
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659203.003.0017 [Google Scholar]
10. Roeper, T.
    (1981) On the deductive model and the acquisition of productive morphology. InC. L. Baker, & J. McCarthy (Eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition (pp.129–150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Roeper, T.
    (2013) There-insertion: How internal Merge guides the acquisition path. InM. Becker, J. Rothman, & J. Grinstead (Eds.), Generative linguistics and acquisition: Studies in honor of Nina M. Hyams (pp.249–270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/lald.54.10roe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.54.10roe [Google Scholar]
12. Roeper, T.
    (2016) Multiple grammars and the logic of learnability in second language acquisition. Frontiers of Psychology, 7(14).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Schafer, R. & Roeper, T.
    (2000) Cross Level Triggers: How an Expletive Triggers the Acquisition of a Discourse Anaphor. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Yang, C.
    (2016) The price of linguistic productivity: How children learn to break rules of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Yang, C.
    (2018) A formalist perspective on language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(6), 665–706.. 10.1075/lab.18014.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18014.yan [Google Scholar]