Prosodic effects on L2 grammars

References

1. Aronoff, M.
   (1976) Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baeskow, H.
   (2004) Lexical properties of selected non-native morphemes of English. Tübingen: Günter Narr Verlag.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carroll, S. E.
   (2001) Input and evidence: the raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.25
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.25 [Google Scholar]
4. Carroll, S. E.
   (2012) First exposure learners make use of top-down lexical knowledge when learning new words. InK. Braunmüller, C. Gabriel & B. Hänel-Faulhaber (Eds.), HSM13 Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies (pp.23–45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hsm.13.04car
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.13.04car [Google Scholar]
5. Carroll, S. E.
   (2013) Introduction to the special issue: Aspects of word learning on first exposure to a second language. Second Language Research, 29, 131–144. 10.1177/0267658312463375
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312463375 [Google Scholar]
6. Carroll, S. E.
   (2014) Processing ‘words’ in early stage SLA: A comparison of first exposure and early stage learners. InZ. H. Han & R. Rast (Eds.), First exposure to a second language acquisition (pp.107–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084390.005
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084390.005 [Google Scholar]
7. Carroll, S. E., & Hracs, L.
   (2018) Inferring the meanings of words from visual and linguistic context: Word learning in absolute beginners. Research Methodology in the Field of Second Language Acquisition & Learning/Les méthodologies de la recherche dans le domaine de l’acquisition et de l’apprentissage des langues secondes. May31 2018, Université de Paul-Valéry, Montpellier III, Montpellier France.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Carroll, S. E., & Widjaja, E.
   (2013) Learning exponents of number on first exposure to an L2. Second Language Research, 29, 201–229. 10.1177/0267658312473471
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312473471 [Google Scholar]
9. Carroll, S. E., & Windsor, J. W.
   (2015) Segmental targets versus lexical interference: Production of second-language targets on first exposure with minimal training. InH. Peukert (Ed.), Transfer effects in multilingual language development (pp.53–85). HSLD4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Corson, D.
    (1985) The lexical bar. Oxford, U.K: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cutler, A.
    (2012) Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9012.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9012.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
12. Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M.
    (1987) The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech & Language, 2, 133–142. 10.1016/0885‑2308(87)90004‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2308(87)90004-0 [Google Scholar]
13. Finn, A., & Hudson Kam, K.
    (2008) The curse of knowledge: First language knowledge impairs adult learners’ use of novel statistics for word segmentation. Cognition, 108, 477–99. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.002 [Google Scholar]
14. Goad, H. & White, L.
    (2019) Prosodic Effects on L2 Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.19043.goa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19043.goa [Google Scholar]
15. Goad, H., White, L., & Steele, J.
    (2003) Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations?Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48, 243–263.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Goldschneider, J. M., and DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2001) Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1–50. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00147
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147 [Google Scholar]
17. Gullberg, M., Roberts, L., Dimroth, C., Veroude, K., & Indefrey, P.
    (2010) Adult language learning after minimal exposure to an unknown natural language. Language Learning, 60, Supplement2, 5–24. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00598.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00598.x [Google Scholar]
18. Jackendoff, R.
    (2002) Foundations of language. Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
19. Kenney, J.
    (2017) Leaping the lexical bar. Blog. AccessedAugust 7, 2019. https://johnkennyweb.wordpress.com/2017/10/09/leaping-the-lexical-bar/
    [Google Scholar]
20. Klein, W., & Perdue, C.
    (1997) The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?), Second Language Research, 13, 301–47. 10.1191/026765897666879396
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666879396 [Google Scholar]
21. MacWhinney, B.
    (2005) New directions in the Competition Model. InM. Tomasello & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Beyond nature-nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp.81–110). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Saffran, J., Newport, E., & Aslin, R. N.
    (1996) Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 606–621. 10.1006/jmla.1996.0032
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0032 [Google Scholar]
23. Wulff, S., and Ellis, N. C.
    (2018) Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. InD. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman & L. Serratrice (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp.37–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.54.03wul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.54.03wul [Google Scholar]