1887
image of ‘Minimal adaptation’ and the edges of prosodic domains
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this online first article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

‘Minimal adaptation’ and the edges of prosodic domains, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/10.1075/lab.19056.deh/lab.19056.deh-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.19056.deh
2019-10-14
2019-11-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Árnason, K.
    (2005) Hljóð. Handbók um hljóðfræði og hljóðkerfisfræði. Íslensk Tunga, I. Bindi. Reykjavík: Almenna bókafélagið.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2011) The phonology of Icelandic and Faroese. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199229314.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199229314.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  3. Goad, H. & White, L.
    (2004) Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. InS. H. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood-Smith, A. Sorace & M. Ota (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook4 (pp.119–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2006) Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: a prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22(3), 243–268. 10.1191/0267658306sr268oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr268oa [Google Scholar]
  5. (2009) Prosodic transfer and the representation of determiners in Turkish-English interlanguage. InN. Snape, Y. I. Leung & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins (pp.1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/lald.47.04goa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.47.04goa [Google Scholar]
  6. (2019) Prosodic Effects on L2 Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.19043.goa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19043.goa [Google Scholar]
  7. Goad, H., White, L. & Steele, J.
    (2003) Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations?Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48(3/4), 243–263. 10.1191/0267658306sr268oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr268oa [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall, T. A.
    (1999) Phonotactics and the prosodic structure of German function words. InT. A. Hall & U. Kleinhenz (Eds.), Studies on the phonological word (pp.99–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/cilt.174.06hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.174.06hal [Google Scholar]
  9. Orešnik, J.
    (1972) On the epenthesis rule in Modern Icelandic. Arkiv för nordisk filologi, 87, 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (1977) Modern Icelandic u-umlaut from the descriptive point of view. Gripla, 2(1), 151–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rögnvaldsson, E.
    (1981) U-hljóðvarp og önnur a~ö víxl í nútímaíslensku. Íslenskt mál, 3, 25–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2013) Hljóðkerfi og orðhlutakerfi íslensku. [Electronic edition] Reykjavík. https://issuu.com/eirikurr/docs/hoi, accessedAugust 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Selkirk, E.
    (1996) The prosodic structure of function words. InJ. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp.187–213). Mahwak, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Skrzypek, D.
    (2009) The formation of the definite article in the Nordic languages. Lingua Posnaniensis, 51(1), 65–76. 10.2478/v10122‑009‑0005‑y
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10122-009-0005-y [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.19056.deh
Loading
  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error