Evidence for syntactic feature transfer between two languages

References

1. Corbett, G. G.
   (1991) Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166119
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166119 [Google Scholar]
2. Finocchiaro, C., Alario, F.-X., Schiller, N. O., Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A.
   (2011) Gender congruency goes Europe: A cross-linguistic study of the gender congruency effect in Romance and Germanic languages. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 23, 161–198.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ganushchak, L. Y., Verdonschot, R. G., & Schiller, N. O.
   (2011) When leaf becomes neuter: event-related potential evidence for grammatical gender transfer in bilingualism. Neuro Report, 22, 106–110.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Goad, H. & White, L.
   (2019) Prosodic Effects on L2 Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.19043.goa
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19043.goa [Google Scholar]
5. Goad, H., White, L., & Bruhn de Garavito, J.
   (2011) Prosodic transfer at different levels of structure: The L2 acquisition of Spanish plurals. InN. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development: Online Proceedings Supplement.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hawkins, R.
   (2000) Persistent selective fossilisation in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 34, 75–90.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hawkins, R., & Franceschina, F.
   (2004) Explaining the acquisition and non-acquisition of determiner-noun gender concord in French and Spanish. InP. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts (pp.175–205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.32.10haw
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.32.10haw [Google Scholar]
8. Hawkins, R., & Liszka, S.
   (2003) Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. InR. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R. Towell (Eds.), The interface between syntax and lexicon in second language acquisition (pp.21–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.30.03haw
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.30.03haw [Google Scholar]
9. La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E.
   (1998) The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 209–219. 10.1007/s004260050026
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050026 [Google Scholar]
10. Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A.
    (1999) The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 907–922.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Rothman, J.
    (2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 179–190. 10.1017/S136672891300059X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891300059X [Google Scholar]
12. Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A.
    (2006) Grammatical gender selection and the representation of morphemes: The production of Dutch diminutives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 945–973. 10.1080/01690960600824344
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600824344 [Google Scholar]
13. Schiller, N. O., & Costa, A.
    (2006) Different selection principles of free-standing and bound morphemes in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1201–1207.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Schiller, N. O.
    (2013) Psycholinguistic approaches to the investigation of grammatical gender in speech production: An overview and new data. In G.C. Corbett, (ed.), The Expression of Gender (161–190). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110307337.161
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110307337.161 [Google Scholar]
15. Schriefers, H.
    (1993) Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841–850.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Wang, M., & Schiller, N. O.
    (2019) A review on grammatical gender agreement in speech production. Frontiers in Language Science, 9, 2754.
    [Google Scholar]