Prosodic transfer in the receptive modality

References

1. Archibald, J.
   (2009) Phonological re-assembly and the importance of phonetic cues. Second Language Research, 25(2), 231–233. 10.1177/0267658308100284
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100284 [Google Scholar]
2. Best, C. T.
   (1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. InW. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistics experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research (pp.171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D.
   (2007) Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. InJ. Munro & O.-S. Bohn (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning. In honor of James Emil Flege (pp.13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
4. Brown, C. A.
   (1998) The role of the L1 grammar in the L2 acquisition of segmental structure. Second Language Research, 14, 136–193. 10.1191/026765898669508401
   https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898669508401 [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, C. A.
   (2000) The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. InJ. Archibald (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory (pp.4–63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Colantoni, L., Steele, J., & Escudero, P.
   (2015) Second Language Speech: Theory and practice. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139087636
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087636 [Google Scholar]
7. Flege, J. E.
   (1987) The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30537‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6 [Google Scholar]
8. Gottfried, T.
   (1984) Effect of consonant context on the perception of French vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 91–114. 10.1016/S0095‑4470(19)30858‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30858-7 [Google Scholar]
9. Goad, H., & White, L.
   (2019) Prosodic Effects on L2 Grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(6). 10.1075/lab.19043.goa
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19043.goa [Google Scholar]
10. Goad, H., White, L., & Steele, J.
    (2003) Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations?Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48, 243–263.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Maye, J., Werker, J., & Gerken, L.
    (2002) Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82(3), B101–B111. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(01)00157‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00157-3 [Google Scholar]
12. Romberg, A. R., & Saffran, J. R.
    (2010) Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(6), 906–914.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Schachter, J.
    (1990) On the issue of completeness. Second Language Research, 6, 93–124.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Schachter, J.
    (1996) Maturation and the issue of Universal Grammar in Second Language Acquisition. InW. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, pp.159–193. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
    (1996) L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72. 10.1177/026765839601200103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200103 [Google Scholar]