1887
image of Prosodic transfer across constructions and domains in L2 inflectional morphology
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Second language (L2) learners are known to have difficulty producing inflection in obligatory contexts reliably. According to the Prosodic Transfer Hypothesis (PTH), the prosodic organisation of L2 inflection is constrained by the inventory of representations available in the L1. At the same time, this hypothesis does not explicitly limit how freely prosodic representations can be transferred, so that transfer across constructions within the same domain (e.g., verbal domain: L1 tense → L2 agreement) and across domains (e.g., verbal domain: L1 tense → nominal domain: L2 plurals) are both possible in principle. The goal of this study was to determine if the current formulation of the PTH is valid, or must be reined in to exclude transfer across domains in particular. Forty-four Korean learners of English did a spoken sentence-construction task in which they had to produce subject-verb agreement and regular plural inflection. Bayesian hierarchical regression was used to analyse the results. By examining asymmetries in the suppliance of short- vs. long-stemmed inflection, we show that there are no grounds for attaching any stipulations to the PTH along the above lines, as prosodic representations are transferrable not only across constructions but also across domains.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.19076.aus
2021-03-01
2021-05-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Audacity Team
    Audacity Team (2017) Audacity: Free audio editor and recorder [Computer software]. https://audacityteam.org
  2. Austin, G.
    (2014) Asymmetries in L2 functional morphology: The Korean learner of English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of New England (Australia).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Austin, G. , Pongpairoj, N. , & Trenkic, D.
    (2015) Structural competition in second language production: Towards a constraint-satisfaction model. Language Learning, 65(3), 689–722. doi:  10.1111/lang.12108
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12108 [Google Scholar]
  4. Avery, P. , & Radisić, M.
    (2007) Accounting for variability in the acquisition of English articles. In A. Belikova , L. Meroni , & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America (GALANA) (pp.1–11). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, M. C.
    (2003) Lexical categories: Verbs, nouns, and adjectives. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615047 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bürkner, P.-C.
    (2018) Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395–411. doi:  10.32614/RJ‑2018‑017
    https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cabrelli Amaro, J. , Campos-Dintrans, G. , & Rothman, J.
    (2017) The role of L1 phonology in L2 morphological production: L2 English past tense production by L1 Spanish, Chinese, and Japanese speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 503–527. doi:  10.1017/S0272263117000122
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000122 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cabrelli, J.
    (2019) Plotting individual learning trajectories in the acquisition of L2 prosodic constraints. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(6), 822–826. doi:  10.1075/lab.19065.cab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19065.cab [Google Scholar]
  9. Carpenter, B. , Gelman, A. , Hoffman, M. D. , Lee, D. , Goodrich, B. , Betancourt, M. , Brubaker, M. , Guo, J. , Li, P. , & Riddell, A.
    (2017) Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(1). doi:  10.18637/jss.v076.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01 [Google Scholar]
  10. Corpus of Contemporary American English
    Corpus of Contemporary American English . (n.d.). https://www.english-corpora.org/coca
  11. Garcia, G. D.
    (2020) Language transfer and positional bias in English stress. Second Language Research, 36(1), 1–30. doi:  10.1177/0267658319882457
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319882457 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gelman, A. , Carlin, J. , Stern, H. , Dunson, D. , Vehtari, A. , & Rubin, D.
    (2014) Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goad, H. , & White, L.
    (2004) Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In S. Foster-Cohen , M. Sharwood Smith , A. Sorace , & M. Ota (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook4 (pp.119–145). John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (2006) Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22(3), 243–268. doi:  10.1191/0267658306sr268oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr268oa [Google Scholar]
  15. (2019) Prosodic effects on L2 grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(6), 769–808. doi:  10.1075/lab.19043.goa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19043.goa [Google Scholar]
  16. Goad, H. , White, L. , & Steele, J.
    (2003) Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations?Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48(3/4), 243–263. doi:  10.1017/S0008413100000669
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100000669 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hawkins, R.
    (2019) Prosodic transfer and its relation to hypotheses of morphological development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(6), 838–842. doi:  10.1075/lab.19052.haw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19052.haw [Google Scholar]
  18. Hawkins, R. , & Casillas, G.
    (2008) Explaining frequency of verb morphology in early L2 speech. Lingua, 118(4), 595–612. doi:  10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  19. IELTS
    IELTS. (n.d.). IELTS speaking band descriptors [PDF file]. https://www.ielts.org/-/media/pdfs/speaking-band-descriptors.ashx?la=en
  20. Jin, F. , Åfarli, T. A. , & van Dommelen, W. A.
    (2009) Variability in L2 acquisition of Norwegian DPs: An evaluation of some current SLA models. In M. Del Pilar , G. Mayo , & R. Hawkins (Eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications (pp.175–199). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.49.12jin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.49.12jin [Google Scholar]
  21. Kabak, B. , & Idsardi, W.
    (2007) Perceptual distortions in the adaptation of English consonant clusters: Syllable structure or consonantal contact constraints?Language and Speech, 50(1), 23–52. doi:  10.1177/00238309070500010201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500010201 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ko, H.
    (2006) Base-output correspondence in Korean nominal inflection. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 15(3), 195–243. doi:  10.1007/s10831‑006‑0001‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-006-0001-y [Google Scholar]
  23. Kruschke, J.
    (2015) Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lardiere, D.
    (1998) Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14(4), 359–375. doi:  10.1191/026765898672500216
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898672500216 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2003) Second language knowledge of [+/–Past] vs. [+/–Finite]. In J. M. Liceras , H. Zobl , & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002) (pp.176–189). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Littlewood, W. T.
    (1981) Language variation and second language acquisition theory. Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 150–158. doi:  10.1093/applin/II.2.150
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/II.2.150 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mellow, J. D. , & Cumming, A.
    (1994) Concord in interlanguage: Efficiency or priming?Applied Linguistics, 15(4), 442–473. doi:  10.1191/0267658304sr234oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658304sr234oa [Google Scholar]
  28. Nespor, M. , & Vogel, I.
    (1986) Prosodic phonology. Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ortega-Llebaria, M. , & Colantoni, L.
    (2014) L2 English intonation: Relations between form-meaning associations, access to meaning, and L1 transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 331–353. doi:  10.1017/S0272263114000011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000011 [Google Scholar]
  30. Özçelik, Ö.
    (2016) The Prosodic Acquisition Path Hypothesis: Towards explaining variability in L2 acquisition of phonology. Glossa, 1(1), 28. 1–48. doi:  10.5334/gjgl.47
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.47 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2018) Universal Grammar and second language phonology: Full Transfer / Prevalent Access in the L2 acquisition of Turkish “stress” by English and French speakers. Language Acquisition, 25(3), 231–267. doi:  10.1080/10489223.2017.1293672
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2017.1293672 [Google Scholar]
  32. Prevost, P. , & White, L.
    (2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2), 103–133. doi:  10.1191/026765800677556046
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765800677556046 [Google Scholar]
  33. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Selkirk, E.
    (1996) The prosodic structure of function words. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp.187–213). Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Song, J.-J.
    (1997) The so-called plural copy in Korean as a marker of distribution and focus. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(2), 203–224. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00042‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00042-2 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2005) The Korean language: Structure, use and context. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Song, Y.
    (2015) L2 processing of plural inflection in English. Language Learning, 65(2), 233–267. doi:  10.1111/lang.12100
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12100 [Google Scholar]
  38. Su, J.
    (2019) Reassembly of plural and human features in the L2 acquisition of Chinese by adult Korean speakers. Second Language Research, 35(4), 529–555. doi:  10.1177/0267658318789223
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658318789223 [Google Scholar]
  39. van der Hulst, H. , & van de Weijer, J.
    (1995) Vowel harmony. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp.495–534). Blackwells.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Vehtari, A.
    (2020, August27). More limitations of cross-validation and actionable recommendations [Blog post]. https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/08/27/more-limitations-of-cross-validation-and-actionable-recommendations
  41. Vehtari, A. , Gelman, A. , & Gabry, J.
    (2017) Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistical Computing, 27(5), 1413–1432. doi:  10.1007/s11222‑016‑9696‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 [Google Scholar]
  42. Watanabe, S.
    (2010) Asymptotic equivalence of Bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterion in singular learning theory. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 3571–3594. https://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/papers/v11/watanabe10a.html
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Yoon, J.
    (2005) Non-morphological determination of nominal particle ordering in Korean. In L. Heggie & F. Ordonez (Eds.), Clitic and affix combinations: Theoretical perspectives (pp.239–282). John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.74.10yoo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.74.10yoo [Google Scholar]
  44. Zwicky, A. , & Pullum, G.
    (1983) Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t . Language, 59(3), 502–513. doi:  10.2307/413900
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413900 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.19076.aus
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.19076.aus
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error