1887
image of Who did what to whom, and what did we already know?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper reports on an experimental investigation of what second language (L2) learners and heritage speakers of Russian know about the relationship between word order and information structure in Russian. The participants completed a bimodal acceptability judgment task, rating the acceptability of SVO and OVS word orders in narrow-focus contexts, under neutral prosody. Heritage speakers behaved like the control group of baseline speakers, preferring SVO order in answer to object questions, and OVS order in answer to subject questions. In contrast, L2 learners preferred SVO order regardless of the context. While the heritage speaker group was more proficient than the L2 group, proficiency alone cannot account for differences in performance: specifically, with regard to acceptance of OVS order for subject narrow focus, heritage speakers improved with proficiency, but L2 learners did not. It is proposed that heritage speakers have an advantage in this domain due to early age of acquisition (cf. ). This finding is consistent with prior literature on narrow focus with heritage speakers of other languages, and suggests that this phenomenon is not particularly vulnerable in heritage languages.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20045.ion
2021-08-20
2021-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Au, T., Knightly, L., Jun, S., & Oh, J.
    (2002) Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science13, 238–243. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00444
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00444 [Google Scholar]
  2. Avrutin, S., & Brun, D.
    (2001) The expression of specificity in a language without determiners: Evidence from child Russian. InA. Do, L. Dominguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.70–81). Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailyn, J.
    (1995) A configurational approach to Russian ‘free’ word order. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  4. Bivon, R.
    (1971) Element order. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brun, D.
    (2005) What children definitely know about definiteness: Evidence from Russian. InS. Franks, F. Gladney, & M. Tasseva-Kurktchieva (Eds.), Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics13 (pp.68–79). Michigan Slavic Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryzgunova, E. A.
    (1980) Intonacija [Intonation]. InN. J. Švedova (Ed.), Russkaja grammatika [Russian grammar] (Vol.1). Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, C.-y.
    (2020) The acquisition of Mandarin by heritage speakers and second language learners. (PhD dissertation), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
  8. Cho, J., & Slabakova, R.
    (2014) Interpreting definiteness in a second language without articles: The case of L2 Russian. Second Language Research, 30, 159–190. 10.1177/0267658313509647
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313509647 [Google Scholar]
  9. Christinsen, R. H. B.
    (2018) Ordinal – regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2018-04-25. Cran. www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/
  10. Dussias, P., & Sagarra, N.
    (2007) The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 10(1), 101–116. 10.1017/S1366728906002847
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002847 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dyakonova, M.
    (2004) Information structure development: Evidence from acquisition of word order in Russian and English. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics, 32(1), 88–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gor, K.
    (2019) Morphosyntactic knowledge in late second language learners and heritage speakers of Russian. Heritage Language Journal, 16(2), 124–150. 10.46538/hlj.16.2.2
    https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.16.2.2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gundel, J.
    (2003) Information structure and referential givenness/newness: How much belongs in the grammar?. Journal of Cognitive Science, 4, 177–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoot, B.
    (2017) Narrow presentational focus in heritage Spanish and the syntax-discourse interface. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7(1), 63–95. doi:  10.1075/lab.14021.hoo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.14021.hoo [Google Scholar]
  15. (2019) Focus in heritage Hungarian. Language Acquisition, 26(1), 46–72. doi:  10.1080/10489223.2017.1393078
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2017.1393078 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hopp, H.
    (2009) The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 12(4), 463–483. doi:  10.1017/S1366728909990253
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990253 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ionin, T., Goldshtein, M., Luchkina, T., & Styrina, S.
    (2020) Word order and information structure in Russian as a heritage or second language. InM. Brown & A. Kohut (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.210–223).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ionin, T., & Luchkina, T.
    (2018) Focus on Russian scope: An experimental investigation of the relationship between quantifier scope, prosody, and information structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 49(4), 741–779. 10.1162/ling_a_00288
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00288 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2019) Scope, syntax and prosody in Russian as a second or heritage language. InJ. Camacho & M. Cabrera (Eds.), Exploring interfaces: Lexicon, syntax, semantics and sound (pp.141–170). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108674195.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108674195.008 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ionin, T., & Montrul, S.
    (2010) The role of L1-transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2-English. Language Learning, 60(4), 877–925. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00577.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00577.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Isurin, L., & Ivanova-Sullivan, T.
    (2008) Lost in between: The case of Russian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 6(1), 72–104. 10.46538/hlj.6.4
    https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.6.4 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ivanova-Sullivan, T.
    (2014) Theoretical and experimental aspects of syntax-discourse interface in heritage grammars. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004246171
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246171 [Google Scholar]
  23. Janssen, B., & Meir, N.
    (2018) Production, comprehension and repetition of accusative case by monolingual Russian and bilingual Russian-Dutch and Russian-Hebrew-speaking children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(4/5), 736–765. 10.1075/lab.17021.jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17021.jan [Google Scholar]
  24. Janssen, B., & Peetrs-Podgaevskaja, A.
    (2012) A case against case: acquisition of Russian case in monolingual and bilingual children. InR. Genis, E. D. Haard, J. Kalsbeek, E. Keizer, & J. Stelleman (Eds.), Between west and east: Festschrift for Wim Honselaar on the occasion of his 65th birthday (pp.319–339). Pegasus.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jasinskaja, K.
    (2016) Information structure in Slavic. InC. Féry & S. Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp.709–732). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Junghanns, U., & Zybatow, G.
    (1997) Syntax and information structure of Russian clauses. InProceedings of the Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL): The Cornell Meeting (pp.289–319). Michigan Slavic Publications
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kallestinova, E.
    (2007) Aspects of word order in Russian. PhD dissertation. University of Iowa. 10.17077/etd.11qhthvg
    https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.11qhthvg
  28. King, T. H.
    (1995) Configuring topic and focus in Russian. CSLI Publications
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kiss, K. É.
    (1998) Identificational focus versus information focus. Language, 74, 245–273. 10.1353/lan.1998.0211
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0211 [Google Scholar]
  30. Laleko, O.
    (2011) Restructuring of verbal aspect in heritage Russian: Beyond lexicalization. International Journal of Language Studies5(3), 13–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2017) Information status and word order in heritage and L2 Russian. Paper presented atThe Tenth Heritage Language Research Institute, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (In press). Discourse and information structure in heritage languages. InS. Montrul & M. Polinsky Eds. The Cambridge handbook of heritage languages and linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Laleko, O., & Dubinina, I.
    (2017) Word order production in heritage Russian: Perspectives from linguistics and pedagogy. InS. Bauckus & S. Kresin (Eds.), Connecting across languages and cultures: A heritage language festschrift in honor of Olga Kagan (pp.191–215). Slavica.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lambrecht, K.
    (1994) Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  35. Leal, T., Destruel, E., & Hoot, B.
    (2019) The acquisition of focus in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 35(4), 449–477. doi:  10.1177/0267658318784343
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658318784343 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2018) The realization of information focus in monolingual and bilingual native Spanish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(2), 217–251. 10.1075/lab.16009.lea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.16009.lea [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee-Ellis, S.
    (2012) Looking into bilingualism through the heritage speaker’s mind. PhD dissertation. University of Maryland.
  38. Lenth, R.
    (2020) emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means, aka least-squares means. R Package, version 1.4.4.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Luchkina, T., Ionin, T., Lysenko, N., Stoops, A., & Suvorkina, N.
    (2021) Evaluating the Russian Language Proficiency of Bilingual and Second Language Learners of Russian. Languages, 6(2), 83. 10.3390/languages6020083
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6020083 [Google Scholar]
  40. Luchkina, T., & Stoops, A.
    (2013) Cloze test as a measure of L2 Russian proficiency. Paper presented at theSecond Language Research Forum 2013, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lukyanchenko, A., & Gor, K.
    (2011) Perceptual correlates of phonological representations in heritage speakers and L2 learners. InProceedings of the 35th Boston University Conference on Language Development.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Montrul, S.
    (2005) Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: Exploring some differences and similarities. Second Language Research, 21(3), 199–249. 10.1191/0267658305sr247oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658305sr247oa [Google Scholar]
  43. (2008) Incomplete acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.39
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.39 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2010) Dominant language transfer in adult L2 learners and heritage speakers. Second Language Research, 3, 293–327. 10.1177/0267658310365768
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310365768 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2011a) Interfaces and incomplete acquisition. Lingua, 121, 591–604. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.05.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2011b) Morphological errors in Spanish second language learners and heritage speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 163–192. doi:  10.1017/S0272263110000720
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000720 [Google Scholar]
  47. Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., & Girju, R.
    (2015) Differential object marking in Spanish, Hindi, and Romanian as heritage languages. Language, 91(3), 564–610. 10.1353/lan.2015.0035
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0035 [Google Scholar]
  48. Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S.
    (2008) Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503–553. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00449.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00449.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Montrul, S., & Ionin, T.
    (2012) Dominant language transfer in Spanish heritage speakers and L2 learners in the interpretation of definite articles. Modern Language Journal, 96, 70–94. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01278.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01278.x [Google Scholar]
  50. Mykhaylyk, R.
    (2011) Factors contributing to child scrambling: Evidence from Ukrainian. Journal of Child Language, 39(3), 553–579. 10.1017/S0305000911000195
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000195 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2013) Bilinguals vs. monolinguals: Where is the difference?Studia Linguistica, 67(1), 101–122. doi:  10.1111/stul.12007
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12007 [Google Scholar]
  52. Neeleman, A., & Titov, E.
    (2009) Focus, contrast and stress in Russian. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 514–524. 10.1162/ling.2009.40.3.514
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.3.514 [Google Scholar]
  53. Odlin, T.
    (1989) Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524537
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524537 [Google Scholar]
  54. Polinsky, M.
    (2007) Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 191–262.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (2008) Russian gender under incomplete acquisition. Heritage Language Journal, 6(1). 10.46538/hlj.6.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.6.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2011) Reanalysis in adult heritage language: A case for attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 305–328. 10.1017/S027226311000077X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311000077X [Google Scholar]
  57. (2018) Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107252349
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107252349 [Google Scholar]
  58. Polinsky, M., & Scontras, G.
    (2020) Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 23(1), 4–20. doi:  10.1017/S1366728919000245
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000245 [Google Scholar]
  59. R_Core_Team
    R_Core_Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R project. www.r-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
    (1996) L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer / Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72. 10.1177/026765839601200103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200103 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sirotinina, O. B.
    (1965) Porjadok slov v russkom jazyke. [‘Word order in Russian’]. Saratov State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Slioussar, N.
    (2011) Russian and the EPP requirement in the tense domain. Lingua, 121, 2048–2068. 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.009 [Google Scholar]
  63. Sorace, A.
    (2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33. doi:  10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor [Google Scholar]
  64. (2016) Referring expressions and executive functions in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(5), 669–684. 10.1075/lab.15055.sor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15055.sor [Google Scholar]
  65. Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L.
    (2009) Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Revisiting the processing vs. representation distinction. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 195–210. 10.1177/1367006909339810
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339810 [Google Scholar]
  66. Svetozarova, N.
    (1998) Intonation in Russian. InD. Hirst & A. di Christo (Eds.), Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages (Vol.3, pp.235–255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Tremblay, A.
    (2011) Proficiency assessment standards in second language acquisition research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 339–372. 10.1017/S0272263111000015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000015 [Google Scholar]
  68. Unsworth, S.
    (2005) Child L2, adult L2, child L1: Differences and similarities: A study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University
  69. (2007) L1 and L2 acquisition between sentence and discourse: Comparing production and comprehensio. Lingua, 117, 1930–1958. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  70. VanPatten, B., Collopy, E., & Qualin, A.
    (2012) Explicit information and processing instruction with nominative and accusative case in Russian as a second language: Just how important is explanation?The Slavic and East European Journal, 56(2), 256–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. White, L.
    (2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815065
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065 [Google Scholar]
  72. (2011) Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua, 121, 577–590. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  73. Yokoyama, O.
    (1986) Discourse and word order. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbcs.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.6 [Google Scholar]
  74. Zubizarreta, M. L.
    (1998) Prosody, focus and word order. MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20045.ion
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20045.ion
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: word order ; Russian ; narrow focus ; information structure
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error