1887
image of Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The current study explores the nature of constituent-structure-independent structural priming across the two languages of bilinguals. Specifically, this study tests whether such cross-linguistic priming involves the priming of functional-level syntactic representations shared between the languages, which can be distinguished from the priming of mainly non-syntactic information (e.g., information structure, thematic-role order). Critical prime sentences consisted of Cantonese actives in the Object-Subject-Verb (OSV) order and passives where the patient was grammatically topicalized with the same topic particle. Target responses were produced in English actives or passives. The results show that robust priming from Cantonese Topic-Passives to English passives occurred, but no cross-linguistic priming was observed for Cantonese Topic-OSV active primes. The Topic-OSV active and Topic-Passive constructions share information structure, and are formed in different constituent structures from English actives and passives. Therefore, the robust cross-linguistic passive priming by Topic-Passive primes should in large part be ascribed to functional-level syntactic representations of passive constructions shared by Cantonese and English.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20046.son
2021-01-18
2021-05-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4, Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:  10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernolet, S. , Hartsuiker, R. J. , & Pickering, M. J.
    (2007) Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 931–949. doi:  10.1037/0278‑7393.33.5.931
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.931 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2009) Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach. Cognition, 112(2), 300–317. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bock, J. K.
    (1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive psychology, 18(3), 355–387. 10.1016/0010‑0285(86)90004‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bock, J. K. , & Levelt, W.
    (1994) Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.945–984). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Branigan, H. P. , & Pickering, M. J.
    (2017) An experimental approach to linguistic representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e282. doi:  10.1017/S0140525X16002028
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16002028 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cai, Z. G. , Pickering, M. J. , & Branigan, H. P.
    (2012) Mapping concepts to syntax: Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 833–849. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, B. , Jia, Y. , Wang, Z. , Dunlap, S. , & Shin, J.-A.
    (2013) Is word-order similarity necessary for cross-linguistic structural priming?Second Language Research, 29(4), 375–389. doi:  10.1177/0267658313491962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658313491962 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Smedt, K.
    (1990) IPF: An incremental parallel formulator. In R. Dale , C. Mellish , & M. M. Zock (Eds.), Current research in natural language generation (pp.167–192). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fleischer, Z. , Pickering, M. J. , & McLean, J. F.
    (2012) Shared information structure: Evidence from cross-linguistic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 568–579. doi:  10.1017/S1366728911000551
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000551 [Google Scholar]
  11. Givón, T.
    (2001) Syntax: An introduction (Vol.1). John Benjamins Publishing. doi:  10.1075/z.syn1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.syn1 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hartsuiker, R. J. , & Bernolet, S.
    (2017) Syntactic levels, lexicalism, and ellipsis: The jury is still out. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e294. doi:  10.1017/S0140525X17000425
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17000425 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartsuiker, R. J. , Pickering, M. J. , & Veltkamp, E.
    (2004) Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Priming in Spanish-English Bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15(6), 409–414. doi:  10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2004.00693.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00693.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang, J. , Pickering, M. J. , Chen, X. , Cai, Z. , Wang, S. , & Branigan, H. P.
    (2019) Does language similarity affect representational integration?Cognition, 185, 83–90. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hwang, H. , Shin, J.-A. , & Hartsuiker, R. J.
    (2018) Late bilinguals share syntax unsparingly between L1 and L2: Evidence from crosslinguistically similar and different constructions. Language Learning, 68(1), 177–205. doi:  10.1111/lang.12272
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12272 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jacob, G. , Katsika, K. , Family, N. , & Allen, S. E. M.
    (2017) The role of constituent order and level of embedding in cross-linguistic structural priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 269–282. doi:  10.1017/S1366728916000717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000717 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jaeger, T. F.
    (2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuznetsova, A. , Brockhoff, P. B. , & Christensen, R. H.
    (2016) lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. doi:  10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  19. Loebell, H. , & Bock, K.
    (2003) Structural priming across languages. Linguistics, 41, 791–824. 10.1515/ling.2003.026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.026 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mahowald, K. , James, A. , Futrell, R. , & Gibson, E.
    (2016) A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 5–27. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  21. Matthews, S. , & Yip, V.
    (2011) Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar (Second Edition). Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780203835012
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203835012 [Google Scholar]
  22. Muylle, M. , Bernolet, S. , & Hartsuiker, R. J.
    (2020) The role of case marking and word order in cross-linguistic structural priming in late L2 acquisition. Language Learning. doi:  10.1111/lang.12400
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12400 [Google Scholar]
  23. Muylle, M. , Bernolet, S. , & Hartsuiker, R.
    (in prep). On the limits of shared syntactic representations: When word order variation blocks priming between an artificial language and Dutch. (Manuscript submitted for publication). doi:  10.31234/osf.io/tx4s9
    https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tx4s9 [Google Scholar]
  24. Peirce, J. , Gray, J. R. , Simpson, S. , MacAskill, M. , Höchenberger, R. , Sogo, H. , … Lindeløv, J. K.
    (2019) PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior research methods, 51(1), 195–203. doi:  10.3758/s13428‑018‑01193‑y
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y [Google Scholar]
  25. Pickering, M. J. , Branigan, H. P. , & McLean, J. F.
    (2002) Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 586–605. doi:  10.1006/jmla.2001.2824
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2824 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pickering, M. J. , & Ferreira, V. S.
    (2008) Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological bulletin, 134(3), 427–459. doi:  10.1037/0033‑2909.134.3.427
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427 [Google Scholar]
  27. Prat-Sala, M. , & Branigan, H. P.
    (2000) Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: A cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), 168–182. doi:  10.1006/jmla.1999.2668
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2668 [Google Scholar]
  28. Riemsdijk, H. C. V. , & Williams, E.
    (1986) Introduction to the theory of grammar (No.12). MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Schoonbaert, S. , Hartsuiker, R. J. , & Pickering, M. J.
    (2007) The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 153–171. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  30. Shin, J.-A. , & Christianson, K.
    (2009) Syntactic processing in Korean–English bilingual production: Evidence from cross-linguistic structural priming. Cognition, 112(1), 175–180. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.03.011 [Google Scholar]
  31. Song, Y. , & Do, Y.
    (2018) Cross-linguistic structural priming in bilinguals: priming of the subject-to-object raising construction between English and Korean. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(1), 47–62. doi:  10.1017/S1366728916001152
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916001152 [Google Scholar]
  32. Song, Y. , & Lai, R. K. Y.
    (in prep.). Syntactic representations encode grammatical functions: evidence from priming of mapping between grammatical functions and thematic roles in Cantonese. (Manuscript submitted for publication).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. van Gompel, R. P. G. , & Arai, M.
    (2018) Structural priming in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(3), 448–455. doi:  10.1017/S1366728917000542
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000542 [Google Scholar]
  34. Vernice, M. , & Hartsuiker, R. J.
    (2019) Mapping thematic roles onto grammatical functions in sentence production: evidence from structural priming in Italian. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 3(1), 39–64. doi:  10.1007/s41809‑019‑00044‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-019-00044-2 [Google Scholar]
  35. Vernice, M. , Pickering, M. J. , & Hartsuiker, R. J.
    (2012) Thematic emphasis in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(5), 631–664. doi:  10.1080/01690965.2011.572468
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.572468 [Google Scholar]
  36. Weber, K. , & Indefrey, P.
    (2009) Syntactic priming in German–English bilinguals during sentence comprehension. NeuroImage, 46(4), 1164–1172. doi:  10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.040
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.040 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20046.son
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20046.son
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error