oa Variation and stability of American Norwegian /r/ in contact

References

1. Amengual, M.
   (2016) Acoustic correlates of the Spanish tap-trill contrast: Heritage and L2 Spanish speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 13(2), 88–112. 10.46538/hlj.13.2.2
   https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.13.2.2 [Google Scholar]
2. Avery, P., & Idsardi, W.
   (2001) Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. InT. A. Hall (Ed.), Distinctive feature theory (pp.41–70). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110886672.41
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886672.41 [Google Scholar]
3. Avery, P., & Rice, K.
   (1989) Segment structure and coronal underspecification. Phonology, 6(2), 179–200. 10.1017/S0952675700001007
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700001007 [Google Scholar]
4. Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M.
   (2013) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(3–4), 129–181. 10.1515/tl‑2013‑0009
   https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
5. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
   (2020) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.1.16. www.praat.org/, accessedJune 22, 2020.
6. Cavirani, E. & van Oostendorp, M.
   (2019) Empty morphemes in Dutch dialect atlases: Reducing morphosyntactic variation by refining emptiness typology. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 88. 10.5334/gjgl.689
   https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.689 [Google Scholar]
7. Dorian, N.
   (1993) Internally and externally motivated changes in language contact settings: Doubts about the dichotomy. InC. Jones (Ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives (pp.131–155). Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dresher, B. E.
   (2009) The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511642005
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642005 [Google Scholar]
9. Dresher, B. E., Piggott, G., & Rice, K.
   (1994) Contrast in phonology: Overview. InC. Dyck (Ed.), Toronto working papers in linguistics12 (pp.i–vi). Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fruehwald, J.
    (2017) The role of phonology in phonetic change. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 25–42. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011516‑034101
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034101 [Google Scholar]
11. Godson, L.
    (2004) Vowel production in the speech of Western Armenian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 2(1), 45–70. 10.46538/hlj.2.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.2.1.3 [Google Scholar]
12. Hall, D. C.
    (2011) Phonological contrast and phonetic enhancement: Dispersedness without dispersion. Phonology, 28(1), 1–54. 10.1017/S0952675711000029
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675711000029 [Google Scholar]
13. Hamann, S.
    (2003) The phonetics and phonology of retroflexes. [Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University]. Utrecht University Repository. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/627.
14. Haugen, E.
    (1969) The Norwegian language in America: A study in bilingual behavior (2nd ed., Vols.1–2). University of Indiana Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Henriksen, N.
    (2015) Acoustic analysis of the rhotic contrast in Chicagoland Spanish: An intergenerational study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(3), 285–321. 10.1075/lab.5.3.01hen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.5.3.01hen [Google Scholar]
16. Hjelde, A.
    (1996) Some phonological changes in a Norwegian dialect in America. InP. S. Ureland & I. Clarkson (Eds.), Language contact across the North Atlantic (pp.283–295). Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110929652.283
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110929652.283 [Google Scholar]
17. Howell, R. B.
    (1991) Old English breaking and its Germanic analogues. Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111356501
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111356501 [Google Scholar]
18. Howell, R. B.
    (1993) German immigration and the development of regional variants of American English: Using contact theory to discover our roots. InJ. Salmons (Ed.), The German language in America (pp.188–217). Max Kade Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hualde, J. I.
    (2005) The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Iverson, G., & Salmons, J.
    (1995) Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology, 12(3), 369–396. 10.1017/S0952675700002566
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700002566 [Google Scholar]
21. Johannessen, J. B.
    (2015) The Corpus of American Norwegian Speech (CANS). InB. Megyesi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (pp.297–300). Linköping University Electronic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Johannessen, J. B., & Laake, S.
    (2012) Østnorsk som fellesdialekt i Midtvesten. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift, 30(2), 365–380.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Johannessen, J. B., & Vaux, B.
    (2013) Retroflex variation and methodological issues: A reply to Simonsen, Moen, and Cowen (2009). Journal of Phonetics, 41(1), 48–55. 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.09.002 [Google Scholar]
24. Kehoe, M.
    (2002) Developing vowel systems as a window to bilingual phonology. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(3), 315–334. 10.1177/13670069020060030601
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069020060030601 [Google Scholar]
25. Kehoe, M.
    (2018) The development of rhotics: A comparison of monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(4), 710–731. 10.1017/S1366728916001279
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916001279 [Google Scholar]
26. Keyser, S. & Stevens, K.
    (2006) Enhancement and overlap in the speech chain. Language, 82(1), 33–63. 10.1353/lan.2006.0051
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0051 [Google Scholar]
27. Kim, J. Y., & Repiso Puigdelliura, G.
    (2019) Deconstructing heritage language dominance: Effects of proficiency, use, and input on heritage language speakers’ production of the Spanish alveolar tap. Phonetica, 77(1), 55–80. 10.1159/000501188
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000501188 [Google Scholar]
28. Kristoffersen, G.
    (2000) The phonology of Norwegian. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kupisch, T.
    (2020) Towards modelling heritage speakers’ sound systems. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 29–30. 10.1017/S1366728919000385
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000385 [Google Scholar]
30. Kupisch, T., Barton, D., Hailer, K., Klaschik, E., Stangen, I., Lein, T., van de Weijer, J.
    (2014) Foreign accent in adult simultaneous bilinguals. Heritage Language Journal, 11(2), 123–150. 10.46538/hlj.11.2.2
    https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.11.2.2 [Google Scholar]
31. Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I.
    (1996) The sounds of the world’s languages. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lindau, M.
    (1985) The story of r. InV. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged (pp.157–168). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lléo, C.
    (2018) Aspects of the phonology of Spanish as a heritage language: From incomplete acquisition to transfer. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(4), 732–747. 10.1017/S1366728917000165
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000165 [Google Scholar]
34. Lléo, C., Kuchenbrandt, I., Kehoe, M., & Trujillo, C.
    (2003) Syllable final consonants in Spanish and German monolingual and bilingual acquisition. InN. Müller (Ed.), (In)vulnerable domains in multilingualism (pp.191–220). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hsm.1.08lle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.1.08lle [Google Scholar]
35. Natvig, D.
    (2019) Levels of representation in phonetic and phonological contact. InJ. Darquennes, J. Salmons & W. Vandenbussche (Eds.), Language contact: An international handbook (Vol.1, pp.88–99). De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Natvig, D.
    (2020) Rhotic underspecification: Deriving variability and arbitrariness through phonological representations. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 48.   10.5334/gjgl.1172
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1172 [Google Scholar]
37. Natvig, D., & Salmons, J.
    (2020) Fully accepting variation in (pre)history: The pervasive heterogeneity of Germanic rhotics. InP. C. Sutcliffe (Ed.), The polymath intellectual: A festschrift in honor of Robert D. King (pp.81–102). Agarita Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Oh, J., Au, T. K.-F., Knightly, L., Jun, S.-A.
    (2003) Holding on to childhood language memory. Cognition, 86(3), B53–B64. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00175‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00175-0 [Google Scholar]
39. Polinsky, M.
    (2018) Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107252349
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107252349 [Google Scholar]
40. Polinsky, M., & Scontras, G.
    (2020) Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 4–20. 10.1017/S1366728919000245
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000245 [Google Scholar]
41. Purnell, T., & Raimy, E.
    (2015) Distinctive features, levels of representation and historical phonology. InP. Honeybone & J. Salmons (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology (pp.522–544). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Putnam, M. T., Kupisch, T., & Pascual y Cabo, D.
    (2018) Different situations, similar outcomes: Heritage grammars across the lifespan. InD. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman, & L. Serratrice (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp.251–279). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.54.12put
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.54.12put [Google Scholar]
43. Putnam, M. T., Perez-Cortes, S., & Sánchez, L.
    (2019) Language attrition and the feature reassembly hypothesis. InB. Köpke & M. Schmid (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language attrition (pp.18–24). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Rice, K.
    (2009) Nuancing markedness: A place for contrast. InE. Raimy & C. E. Cairnes (Eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonology (pp.311–321). Cambridge, MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262182706.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262182706.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
46. Ross, H. R.
    (1907) Norske Bygdemaal: III–IV: Oust-Telemaal o Numedalsmaal; Hallingmaal o Valdresmaal; Gudbrandsdalsmaal; Upplandsmaal. A.W. Brøggers.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Rothman, J.
    (2009) Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 155–163. 10.1177/1367006909339814
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339814 [Google Scholar]
48. Salmons, J.
    (2016) Rhotics in language contact: Phonetics and phonology of variation in real time. 7th Workshop on Immigrant Languages in the Americas, Athens, GA.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Salmons, J.
    (in press). Sound change. Edinburgh University Press. 10.1093/obo/9780199772810‑0098
    https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0098 [Google Scholar]
50. Salmons, J., & Purnell, T.
    (2020) Contact and the development of American English. InR. Hickey (Ed.), The handbook of language contact (2nd ed., pp.361–383). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119485094.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119485094.ch18 [Google Scholar]
51. Schiller, N. O.
    (1999) The Phonetic Variation of German /r/. InM. Butt & N. Fuhrhop (Eds.), Variation und Stabilität in der Wortstruktur: Untersuchungen zu Entwicklung, Erwerb und Varietäten des Deutschen und anderer Sprachen (pp.261–287). Georg Olms Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Stevens, K., Keyser, S., & Kawasaki, H.
    (1986) Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features. InJ. S. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes (pp.426–449). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Tanner, J., Sonderegger, M., & Stuart-Smith, J.
    (2020) Structured speaker variability in Japanese stops: Relationships within versus across cues to stop voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 148(2), 793–804. 10.1121/10.0001734
    https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001734 [Google Scholar]
54. Trubetzkoy, N. S.
    (1969) Principles of phonology (C. A. M. Baltaxe, Trans.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1939).
    [Google Scholar]
55. Van Coetsem, F.
    (1988) Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Foris Publications USA. 10.1515/9783110884869
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884869 [Google Scholar]
56. Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. I.
    (1968) Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InW. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions in historical linguistics (pp.97–195). University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Wilkerson, M. E., & Salmons, J.
    (2008) “Good old immigrants of yesteryear” who didn’t learn English: Germans in Wisconsin. American Speech, 83(3), 259–283. 10.1215/00031283‑2008‑020
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-020 [Google Scholar]