1887
image of How explicit instruction improves phonological awareness and perception of L2 sound contrasts in younger and older
adults
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Despite the importance of conscious awareness in second language acquisition theories, little is known about how L2 speech perception can be improved by explicit phonetic instruction. This study examined the relationship between phonological awareness and perception in Dutch younger and older adult L2 listeners, focusing on English contrasts of two types: a familiar contrast in an unfamiliar position (word-final /t/-/d/) and an unfamiliar contrast (/æ/-/ε/). Awareness was assessed with a task in which written minimal pairs and homophone pairs had to be judged as sounding the same or different. Perception was assessed with a two-alternative forced-choice identification task with auditorily presented words from minimal pairs. We investigated whether listeners’ awareness and perception improved after a video-based explicit instruction that oriented their attention to one of these contrasts, and we tested whether including information about the phonetic cue of vowel duration increased learning. Awareness and perception of each contrast were shown to be moderately correlated at the study’s outset. Furthermore, awareness and perception for each contrast generally improved more after the instruction drawing attention to that contrast. However, the effectiveness of explicit phonetic instruction varied depending on the combination of the contrast, cue information, and listener age group.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20113.fel
2021-11-02
2021-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anthony, J. L. & Francis, D. J.
    (2005) Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 255–259. doi:  10.1111/j.0963‑7214.2005.00376.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00376.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassetti, B., Escudero, P., & Hayes-Harb, R.
    (2015) Second language phonology at the interface between acoustic and orthographic input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 1–6. doi:  10.1017/S0142716414000393
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000393 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:  10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  4. Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D.
    (2007) Non-native and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. InO. -S. Bohn & M. Munro. (Eds.), Language experience in second-language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp.13–34). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
  5. Bieber, R. E., & Gordon-Salant, S.
    (2021) Improving older adults’ understanding of challenging speech: Auditory training, rapid adaptation and perceptual learning. Hearing Research, 402, 108054. doi:  10.1016/j.heares.2020.108054
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2020.108054 [Google Scholar]
  6. Broersma, M.
    (2010) Perception of final fricative voicing: native and nonnative listeners’ use of vowel duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(3), 1636–1644. doi:  10.1121/1.3292996
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3292996 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2012) Increased lexical activation and reduced competition in second-language listening. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(7–8), 1205–1224. doi:  10.1080/01690965.2012.660170
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.660170 [Google Scholar]
  8. Broersma, M., & Cutler, A.
    (2008) Phantom word activation in L2. System, 36(1), 22–34. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2007.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, A.
    (1995) Minimal pairs: Minimal importance?ELT Journal, 49(2), 169–175. doi:  10.1093/elt/49.2.169
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.2.169 [Google Scholar]
  10. Booij, G.
    (1999) The phonology of Dutch. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brysbaert, M., & New, B.
    (2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi:  10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chandrasekaran, B., Yi, H., Smayda, K. E., & Maddox, W. T.
    (2016) Effect of explicit dimensional instruction on speech category learning. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 566–582. doi:  10.3758/s13414‑015‑0999‑x
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0999-x [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, Y., & Pederson, E.
    (2017) Directing attention during perceptual training: A preliminary study of phonetic learning in Southern Min by Mandarin speakers. InProceedings of Interspeech 2017 (pp.1770–1774). doi:  10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑1600
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1600 [Google Scholar]
  14. Collins, B., & Mees, I. M.
    (1996) The phonetics of English and Dutch (3rd ed.). E. J. Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Díaz, B., Mitterer, H., Broersma, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
    (2012) Individual differences in late bilinguals’ L2 phonological processes: From acoustic-phonetic analysis to lexical access. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 680–689. 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eisner, F. & McQueen, J. M.
    (2005) The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(2), 224–238. doi:  10.3758/BF03206487
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206487 [Google Scholar]
  17. Field, J.
    (2008) Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Flege, J. E. & Bohn, O. -S.
    (2021) The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). InR. Wayland. (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp.3–83). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108886901.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C.
    (2002) Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(2), 349–366. doi:  10.1037/0096‑1523.28.2.349
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.349 [Google Scholar]
  20. Guion, S. G., & Pederson, E.
    (2007) Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. InO. S. Bohn & M. Munro. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp.57–77). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.09gui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.09gui [Google Scholar]
  21. Gordon-Salant, S.
    (2005) Hearing loss and aging: New research findings and clinical implications. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 42(4), 9–24. doi:  10.1682/JRRD.2005.01.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2005.01.0006 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hisagi, M., & Strange, W.
    (2011) Perception of Japanese temporally-cued contrasts by American English listeners. Language and Speech, 54(2), 241–264. doi:  10.1177/0023830910397499
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910397499 [Google Scholar]
  23. House, A. S.
    (1961) On vowel duration in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33(9), 1174–1178. doi:  10.1121/1.1908941
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908941 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hillenbrand, J. M., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K.
    (1995) Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3099–3111. doi:  10.1121/1.411872
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411872 [Google Scholar]
  25. Janssen, C., Segers, E., McQueen, J. M., & Verhoeven, L.
    (2015) Lexical specificity training effects in second language learners. Language Learning, 65(2), 358–389. doi:  10.1111/lang.12102
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12102 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kissling, E. M.
    (2014) Phonetics instruction improves learners’ perception of L2 sounds. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 254–275. doi:  10.1177/1362168814541735
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541735 [Google Scholar]
  27. Krenca, K., Segers, E., Chen, X., Shakory, S., Steele, J., & Verhoeven, L.
    (2020) Phonological specificity relates to phonological awareness and reading ability in English-French bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 33, 267–291. doi:  10.1007/s11145‑019‑09959‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09959-2 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kubo, R., & Akahane-Yamada, R.
    (2006) Influence of aging on perceptual learning of English phonetic contrasts by native speakers of Japanese. Acoustical Science and Technology, 27(1), 59–61. doi:  10.1250/ast.27.59
    https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.27.59 [Google Scholar]
  29. Maddox, W. T., Chandrasekaran, B., Smayda, K., & Yi, H.
    (2013) Dual systems of speech category learning across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 28(4), 1042–1056. doi:  10.1037/a0034969
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034969 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pederson, E., & Guion-Anderson, S.
    (2010) Orienting attention during phonetic training facilitates learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(2), EL54–59. doi:  10.1121/1.3292286
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3292286 [Google Scholar]
  31. Peelle, J. E., & Wingfield, A.
    (2005) Dissociations in perceptual learning revealed by adult age differences in adaptation to time-compressed speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1315–1330. doi:  10.1037/0096‑1523.31.6.1315
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1315 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Souza, P. E.
    (2003) Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech. International Journal of Audiology, 42(Suppl2), 2S11–2S16. doi:  10.3109/14992020309074638
    https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020309074638 [Google Scholar]
  33. Porretta, V. J., & Tucker, B. V.
    (2014) Perception of non-native consonant length contrast: The role of attention in phonetic processing. Second Language Research, 31(2), 239–265. doi:  10.1177/0267658314559573
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314559573 [Google Scholar]
  34. Raphael, L. J.
    (2005) Acoustic cues to the perception of segmental phonemes. InD. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez. (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp.182–206). Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470757024.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757024.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sakai, M., & Moorman, C.
    (2018) Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39, 187–224. doi:  10.1017/S0142716417000418
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000418 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schepens, J., Dijkstra, T., & Grootjen, F.
    (2012) Distributions of cognates in Europe as based on Levenshtein distance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1), 157–166. doi:  10.1017/S1366728910000623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000623 [Google Scholar]
  37. Scharenbourg, O., & Janse, E.
    (2013) Comparing lexically guided perceptual learning in younger and older listeners. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 525–536. doi:  10.3758/s13414‑013‑0422‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0422-4 [Google Scholar]
  38. Slis, I. H., & Cohen, A.
    (1969) On the complex regulating the voiced-voiceless distinction I. Language and Speech, 12(2), 80–102. doi:  10.1177/002383096901200202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096901200202 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sommers, M. S.
    (1997) Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition. II. The effects of age and hearing impairment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2278–2288. doi:  10.1121/1.418208
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418208 [Google Scholar]
  40. Svalberg, A. M. L.
    (2007) Language awareness and language learning. Language Teaching, 40(4), 287–308. doi:  10.1017/S0261444807004491
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004491 [Google Scholar]
  41. Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V.
    (1994) Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183–203. doi:  10.1017/S0272263100012870
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012870 [Google Scholar]
  42. van der Feest, S. V. H., & Swingley, D.
    (2011) Dutch and English listeners’ interpretation of vowel duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(3), EL57–EL63. doi:  10.1121/1.3532050
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3532050 [Google Scholar]
  43. van Leussen, J. -W., & Escudero, P.
    (2015) Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1000. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01000
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01000 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20113.fel
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20113.fel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: speech perception ; attention ; phonological awareness ; explicit instruction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error