1887
Volume 14, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This experimental study examines the acquisition of null and overt pronoun interpretations in Chinese as a second language by native speakers of English. A linguistic phenomenon not present in the native language of the learners is identified: the null element in the embedded subject position of Mandarin resultative constructions can only refer to the main-clause subject, while an overt pronoun in the same position can refer both to the main-clause subject and to another entity in the discourse. Thus the acquisition task includes learning a new functional morpheme, a null element, as well as constraining its interpretation in the resultative construction. We tested 59 L2 learners of Chinese at different proficiency levels and 51 native Mandarin speakers on a Truth Value Judgment Task. The learners showed a pattern of interpretation that was statistically indistinguishable from the native speakers’ in all but one context. We argue that our findings point to largely successful acquisition of the requisite proform interpretations, even though the restrictions on the interpretation of null elements cannot be transferred from the native language.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20120.sla
2023-01-10
2024-05-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D.
    (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Language and Memory, 59(4), 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). 10.18637/jss.v067.i01. RetrievedMarch 2020.
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
    (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Language and Memory, 68(3), 255–78. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferreira, F.
    (1994) Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 331, 715–736. 10.1006/jmla.1994.1034
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1034 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chien, Y. C., & Wexler, K.
    (1990) Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition, 11, 225–295. 10.1207/s15327817la0103_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0103_2 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chomsky, N.
    (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1988) Language and problems of knowledge: The Managua lectures. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Crawley, R. A., Stevenson, R. J., & Kleinman, D.
    (1990) The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 191, 245–264. 10.1007/BF01077259
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077259 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, N. C. & Wulff, S.
    (2020) Usage-based approaches to L2 acquisitionInBill VanPatten, Gregory D. Keating, Stefanie Wulff (Eds.) Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (pp. 63–85). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429503986‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503986-4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Grodzinsky, Y. & Reinhart, T.
    (1993) The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry, 241, 69–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hawkins, R. & Chan, C. Y. H.
    (1997) The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second language research, 13(3), 187–226. 10.1191/026765897671476153
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897671476153 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hawkins, R. and Hattori, H.
    (2006) Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers, a missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, 22(3), 269–301. 10.1191/0267658306sr269oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr269oa [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoekstra, T.
    (1988) Small Clause Results. Lingua, 741, 101–139. 10.1016/0024‑3841(88)90056‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(88)90056-3 [Google Scholar]
  15. Holmberg, A.
    (2005) Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, 361, 533–64. 10.1162/002438905774464322
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464322 [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang, C.-T. J.
    (1982) Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar [Doctoral dissertation], MIT.
  17. (1984) On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 151, 531–574.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang, C.-T. James
    (1988) Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language, 64(2), 274–311. 10.2307/415435
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415435 [Google Scholar]
  19. (1989) Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. InO. Jaeggli & K. J. Safir (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter (pp. 185–214). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2540‑3_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_6 [Google Scholar]
  20. (1992) Complex predicates in control. InR. K. Larson, S. Iatridou, U. Lahiri & J. Higginbotham (Eds.), Control and Grammar (pp. 109–147). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑7959‑9_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7959-9_4 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2006) Resultatives and unaccusatives: A parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan, 2531, 1–43. 10.7131/chuugokugogaku.2006.1
    https://doi.org/10.7131/chuugokugogaku.2006.1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang, Y.
    (1994) The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora: a study with special reference to Chinese. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511554292
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554292 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gernsbacher, M. A.
    (1989) Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition, 321, 99–156. 10.1016/0010‑0277(89)90001‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90001-2 [Google Scholar]
  24. Grober, E. H., Beardsley, W. & Caramazza, A.
    (1978) Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment. Cognition, 61, 117–133. 10.1016/0010‑0277(78)90018‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(78)90018-5 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kaiser, E.
    (2011) Focusing on pronouns: Consequences of subjecthood, pronominalisation, and contrastive focus. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 1625–1666. 10.1080/01690965.2010.523082
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.523082 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lasnik, H. and Lidz, J.
    (2016) ‘The Argument from the Poverty of the Stimulus’, inRoberts, I. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 221–248. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573776.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573776.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lenth, R.
    (2018) emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka leastsquares means (Version 1.1.2). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, Y.
    (1999) Cross-componential causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17(3), 445–497. 10.1023/A:1006236828263
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006236828263 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2005) X0: A theory of the morphology-syntax interface. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Manzini, R.
    (1983) On Control and Control Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 141, 421–446.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Reinhart, T.
    (2006) Interface Strategies: Optimal and Costly Computations. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3846.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3846.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2011) Processing or pragmatics? Explaining the coreference delay. InT. Gibson & N. Pearlmutter (Eds.), The Processing and Acquisition of Reference (pp. 157–194). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262015127.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015127.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  35. Rizzi, L.
    (1986) Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17(3), 501–558.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rizzi, L. & Shlonsky, U.
    (2007) Strategies of subject extraction. InU. Sauerland & H.-M. Gärtner (Eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics (pp. 115–160). Mouton de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Roberts, I.
    (2010) A deletion analysis of null subjects. InT. Biberauer., A. Holmberg., I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric Variation (pp. 58–87). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Schwartz, Bonnie D., and Rex A. Sprouse
    (2013) Generative approaches and the poverty of the stimulus. InJulia Herschensohn and Martha Young-Scholten (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 137–158). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
    (1996) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second language research, 12(1), 40–72. 10.1177/026765839601200103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200103 [Google Scholar]
  40. Shibata, N., & Yashima, J.
    (2014) Reference-Set Computation in Children: Mandarin-Speaking Children’s Pronoun Interpretation in Avoid Pronoun Contexts, Language Acquisition, 21(3), 304–315. 10.1080/10489223.2014.892944
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2014.892944 [Google Scholar]
  41. Slabakova, R.
    (2016) Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Slabakova, R., White, L., & Brambatti Guzzo, N.
    (2017) Pronoun Interpretation in the Second Language: Effects of Computational Complexity. Frontiers in Psychology, 81, Article 1236, https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01236. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01236
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01236 [Google Scholar]
  43. Spyropoulos, V.
    (2005) Agreement and multiple case licensing in Greek. InM. Stavrou & A. Terzi (Eds.) Advances in Greek generative syntax (pp. 15–40). John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.76.03spy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.76.03spy [Google Scholar]
  44. Tang, S.-W.
    (1997) The parametric approach to the resultative construction in Chinese and English. UCI Working Papers in Linguistics, 31, 203–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Taraldsen, K. T.
    (1978) On the Nominative Island Condition, Vacuous Application, and the That-trace Filter. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Tsao, F.-F.
    (1977) A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese: The First Step toward Discourse Analysis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], University of Southern California.
  47. Tsimpli, I. M. & Dimitrakopoulou, M.
    (2007) The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23(2), 215–242. 10.1177/0267658307076546
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307076546 [Google Scholar]
  48. Prévost, P., & White, L.
    (2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second language research, 16(2), 103–133. 10.1191/026765800677556046
    https://doi.org/10.1191/026765800677556046 [Google Scholar]
  49. White, L.
    (1985) The pro-drop parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 351, 47–62. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1985.tb01014.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01014.x [Google Scholar]
  50. (2003) Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815065
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065 [Google Scholar]
  51. Yuan, B.
    (1993) Directionality of Difficulty in Second Language Acquisition of Chinese and English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], University of Edinburgh.
  52. Zhang, N.
    (2001) The Structure of Depictive and Resultative Constructions in Chinese. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 221, 191–221. 10.21248/zaspil.22.2001.107
    https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.22.2001.107 [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhao, L. X.
    (2012) Interpretation of Chinese overt and null embedded arguments by English-speaking Learners. Second Language Research, 281, 169–190. 10.1177/0267658312437629
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312437629 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2008) The syntax and interpretation of overt and null arguments in Chinese and their acquisition by second language learners [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], University of Cambridge.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20120.sla
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.20120.sla
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error