1887
Volume 14, Issue 5
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This corpus-based study investigates intonation patterns in the production of Cantonese by Cantonese-English bilingual children. We examine the intonation patterns in eight simultaneous bilingual children acquiring a tonal (Cantonese) and an intonational language (English) from 2;0 to 3;0. Two intonation patterns are observed in all the bilingual children studied: high pitch followed by a fall (including H_H*L% and H_L*L%) and low pitch followed by a rise (including L_H*H% and L_L*H%), in which English-like intonation is applied to Cantonese and code-mixed utterances. They illustrate cross-linguistic influence in prosody from English in the bilingual children’s early phonological development. Language dominance, use of sentence-final particles, and the children’s grammatical complexity are found to be significant predictors for the production of bilingual intonation. First, the more dominant the child is in Cantonese, the less bilingual intonation is produced in Cantonese and code-mixed utterances. Second, bilingual intonation is significantly more likely to be produced in utterances with sentence-final particles than without. Third, the greater the child’s grammatical complexity, the lower the predicted probability of producing bilingual intonation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.21049.lee
2023-04-11
2025-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  2. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2019) Praat: doing phonetics by computer (6.0.47). www.praat.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chao, Y. R.
    (1930) A system of tone-letters. Le Maître Phonétique, 451, 24–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng, S.-P., & Tang, S.-W.
    (2022) Syntax of sentence-final particles in Chinese. InC.-R. Huang, Y.-H. Lin, I.-H. Chen, & Y.-Y. Hsu (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Chinese Linguistics (pp.578–596). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108329019.030
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108329019.030 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheung, L. Y. L.
    (2010) The syntactic manifestation of the nuclear stress rule in Cantonese. Proceedings of 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Los Angeles, California.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M.
    (1968) The Sound Pattern of English. Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chor, W.
    (2018) Sentence final particles as epistemic modulators in Cantonese conversations: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 1291, 34–47. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen, J.
    (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. 10.1177/001316446002000104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104 [Google Scholar]
  10. Deuchar, M., & Quay, S.
    (2000) Bilingual Acquisition: Theoretical Implications of a Case Study. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Döpke, S.
    (2000) Cross-Linguistic Structures in Simultaneous Bilingualism. John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.21
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.21 [Google Scholar]
  12. Engemann, H.
    (2021) How (not) to cross a boundary: Crosslinguistic influence in simultaneous bilingual children’s event construal. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fletcher, P., Leung, S., Stokes, S., & Weizman, Z.
    (2000) Cantonese pre-school language development: a guide. (Report of a project funded by the Language Fund, 1996–1999).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fox, A., Luke, K.-K., & Nancarrow, O.
    (2008) Aspects of intonation in Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 36(2), 321–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fox, J., & Weisberg, S.
    (2019) An R Companion to Applied Regression (3rd ed.). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Grice, M., German, J. S., & Warren, P.
    (2020) Intonation systems across varieties of English. InC. Gussenhoven & A. Chen (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Prosody (pp.285–302). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gu, C.
    (2014) Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models: R Package gss. Journal of Statistical Software, 58(5), 1–25. 10.18637/jss.v058.i05
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v058.i05 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gut, U.
    (2000) Bilingual Acquisition of Intonation: A Study of Children Speaking German and English. Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110929881
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110929881 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hughes, C., Devine, R. T., Mesman, J., & Blair, C.
    (2020) Understanding the terrible twos: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of early executive function and parent–child interactions. Developmental Science, 23(6), e12979. 10.1111/desc.12979
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12979 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hulk, A., & Müller, N.
    (2000) Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 227–244. 10.1017/S1366728900000353
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728900000353 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kontaxi, M., & Chaida, A.
    (2015) Question intonation of Greek-American simultaneous bilinguals. Proceedings of the 6th ISEL Conference ExLing 2015, 33–36. Athens, Greece.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ladd, D. R.
    (1996) Intonational Phonology (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (2008) Intonational Phonology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511808814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808814 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K.
    (2015) A Course in Phonetics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lai, L.-F.
    (2018) Intonation in contact: Prosodic transfer and innovation among Yami-Mandarin bilinguals. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
  26. Lai, L.-F., & Gooden, S.
    (2018) Intonation in contact: Mandarin influence in Yami. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2018, 952–956. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018‑192
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-192 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lai, R. Y. K.
    (2006) Language mixing in an English-Cantonese bilingual child with uneven development. MPhil thesis, The University of Hong Kong. 10.5353/th_b3579379
    https://doi.org/10.5353/th_b3579379 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, J. H. N.
    (2021) Low boundary tone: Evidence from the acoustic differences between Cantonese sentence-final particles with low-falling tone. 1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI), 176–180. 10.21437/TAI.2021‑36
    https://doi.org/10.21437/TAI.2021-36 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee, J. H. N., Chui, H., Lee, T., Luk, S., Tao, D., & Lee, N. W. T.
    (2022) Formality in psychotherapy: How are therapists’ and clients’ use of discourse particles related to therapist empathy?Frontiers in Psychiatry, 131, 1018170. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1018170
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1018170 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lenth, R. V.
    (2021) emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (1.5.4). https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Liberman, M.
    (1975) The Intonational System of English. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  32. (2019) Corpus Phonetics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 51, 91–107. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011516‑033830
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-033830 [Google Scholar]
  33. MacWhinney, B.
    (2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Matthews, S., & Yip, V.
    (2011) Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar (2nd ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Meisel, J.
    (1989) Early differentiation of language in bilingual children. InK. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss (pp.13–40). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611780.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611780.003 [Google Scholar]
  36. Miller, J., & Chapman, R.
    (1981) The Relation between Age and Mean Length of Utterance in Morphemes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24(2), 154–161. 10.1044/jshr.2402.154
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2402.154 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mok, P. P. K.
    (2011) The acquisition of speech rhythm by three-year-old bilingual and monolingual children: Cantonese and English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(4), 458–472. 10.1017/S1366728910000453
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000453 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2013) Speech rhythm of monolingual and bilingual children at age 2;6: Cantonese and English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 693–703. 10.1017/S1366728912000636
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000636 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mok, P. P. K., & Lee, A.
    (2018) The acquisition of lexical tones by Cantonese-English bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 45(6), 1357–1376. 10.1017/S0305000918000260
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000918000260 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nicoladis, E.
    (2002) What’s the difference between ‘toilet paper’ and ‘paper toilet’? French-English bilingual children’s crosslinguistic transfer in compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 29(4), 843–863. 10.1017/S0305000902005366
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902005366 [Google Scholar]
  41. Paradis, J., & Navarro, S.
    (2003) Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: what is the role of the input?Journal of Child Language, 30(2), 371–393. 10.1017/S0305000903005609
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005609 [Google Scholar]
  42. Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Cuza, A., & Thomas, D.
    (2011) Clitic placement in Spanish-English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(2), 221–232. 10.1017/S1366728910000234
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000234 [Google Scholar]
  43. Puri, V.
    (2013) Intonation in Indian English and Hindi late and simultaneous bilinguals. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  44. (2018) Focus in Indian English and Hindi late and simultaneous bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(3), 343–371. 10.1075/lab.15009.pur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15009.pur [Google Scholar]
  45. Qian, Y., Lee, T., & Soong, F. K.
    (2007) Tone recognition in continuous Cantonese speech using supratone models. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(5), 2936–2945. 10.1121/1.2717413
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2717413 [Google Scholar]
  46. Queen, R.
    (2001) Bilingual intonation patterns: Evidence of language change from Turkish-German bilingual children. Language in Society, 30(1), 55–80. 10.1017/S0047404501001038
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404501001038 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2012) Turkish-German bilinguals and their intonation: Triangulating evidence about contact-induced language change. Language, 88(4), 791–816. 10.1353/lan.2012.0078
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0078 [Google Scholar]
  48. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Schmitz, K., Patuto, M., & Müller, N.
    (2012) The null-subject parameter at the interface between syntax and pragmatics: Evidence from bilingual German-Italian, German-French and Italian-French children. First Language, 32(1–2), 205–238. 10.1177/0142723711403880
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723711403880 [Google Scholar]
  50. Serratrice, L.
    (2013) Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual development. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(1), 3–25. 10.1075/lab.3.1.01ser
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.3.1.01ser [Google Scholar]
  51. So, L. K. H., & Dodd, B. J.
    (1995) The acquisition of phonology by Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 22(3), 473–495. 10.1017/S0305000900009922
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900009922 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
    (2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. 10.1191/0267658306sr271oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr271oa [Google Scholar]
  53. Strik, N.
    (2012) Wh-questions in child bilingual acquisition of French: Derivational complexity and cross-linguistic influence. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 57(1), 133–151. 10.1017/S0008413100002231
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100002231 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sybesma, R., & Li, B.
    (2007) The dissection and structural mapping of Cantonese sentence final particles. Lingua, 117(10), 1739–1783. 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  55. Tang, S.
    (2015) A generalized syntactic schema for utterance particles in Chinese. Lingua Sinica, 1(3), 1–23. 10.1186/s40655‑015‑0005‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40655-015-0005-5 [Google Scholar]
  56. The Linguistic Society of Hong Kong
    The Linguistic Society of Hong Kong (2002) Hong Kong Jyut Ping Character Table (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: The Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. To, C. K. S., Cheung, P. S. P., & McLeod, S.
    (2013) A population study of children’s acquisition of Hong Kong Cantonese consonants, vowels, and tones. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(1), 103–122. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2012/11‑0080)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0080) [Google Scholar]
  58. Tse, J. K.-P.
    (2008) Tone acquisition in Cantonese: a longitudinal case study. Journal of Child Language, 5(2), 191–204. 10.1017/S0305000900007418
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900007418 [Google Scholar]
  59. Tsimpli, I., & Sorace, A.
    (2006) Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. InD. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.653–664). Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Tukey, J. W.
    (1977) Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley Pub.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Vance, T. J.
    (2008) The Sounds of Japanese. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Wakefield, J. C.
    (2020) Intonational Morphology. Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑15‑2265‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2265-9 [Google Scholar]
  63. Werker, J. F., Hall, D. G., & Fais, L.
    (2004) Reconstruing U-shaped functions. Journal of Cognition and Development, 51, 147–151. 10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_15
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_15 [Google Scholar]
  64. Xu, B. R., & Mok, P. P. K.
    (2011) Final rising and global raising in Cantonese intonation. Proceedings of 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2173–2176.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Xu, Y.
    (2013) ProsodyPro -- A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody 2013, 7–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Yip, V., & Matthews, S.
    (2000) Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese-English bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 193–208. 10.1017/S136672890000033X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890000033X [Google Scholar]
  67. (2006) Assessing language dominance in bilingual acquisition: A case for mean length utterance differentials. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(2), 97–116. 10.1207/s15434311laq0302_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0302_2 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2007) The Bilingual Child: Early Development and Language Contact. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620744
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620744 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.21049.lee
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.21049.lee
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error