1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
  4. Volume 14, Issue 6
  5. Article
Volume 14, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The study investigates the acquisition of telicity in L2 English by L1 Slovak speakers as a function of L2 proficiency (measured by a cloze test score), exposure (operationalized as length of stay in an English-speaking country) and instruction type (monolingual vs. bilingual). Telicity judgments were collected from Slovak learners of L2 English ( = 50) and a control group of American English native speakers ( = 15) in two offline acceptability judgment tasks. Two types of telicity encoding were examined: (1) the contribution of the [±quantized] feature of the object argument to predicate telicity, which involves processes in narrow syntax; and (2) the contribution of adverbial modifiers to telicity interpretations, including coercion contexts, which involve processes of aspectual reinterpretation. Based on previous research, it was hypothesized that the contribution of the [±quantized] feature of the object argument to predicate telicity, which is a syntactic phenomenon, will be easier to acquire than aspectual coercion by means of adverbial modifiers, which relies on pragmatic cues. The results indicate that the most significant predictor of telicity judgments based on syntactic cues is L2 proficiency, while length of stay affects telicity judgments in predicate categories involving coercion contexts.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.21075.nad
2023-06-02
2025-05-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lab.21075.nad
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alruwaili, R.
    (2014) Second language acquisition of aspect and tense by Saudi-Arabic learners of English. [Doctoral dissertation, University of York]. White Rose eThesis online. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/7203/
  2. Barr, D.
    (2019) Coding categorical predictor variables in factorial designs. https://talklab.psy.gla.ac.uk/tvw/catpred/
  3. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, Ch., & Tily, H. J.
    (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B.
    (2012) Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999999–0). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bílý, M.
    (1986) Iterative verbs in West Slavic languages, especially in Czech. Slovo: Journal of Slavic Languages and Literatures, 321, 21–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Borer, H.
    (1994) The projection of arguments. InE. Benedicto, & J. Runner (Eds.), University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics, 171 (pp.19–47). University of Massachusetts: Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cho, J., & Slabakova, R.
    (2015) A feature-based contrastive approach to the L2 acquisition of specificity. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 318–339. 10.1093/applin/amv029
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv029 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) The minimalist program. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. (2004) Beyond explanatory adequacy. InA. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol 3 (pp.104–131). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. (2007) Approaching UG from below. Interfaces + recursion = language?InU. Sauerland, & H.-M. Gärtner (Eds.), Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics (pp.1–29). Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. De Swart, H.
    (1998) Aspect shift and coercion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 161, 347–385. 10.1023/A:1005916004600
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005916004600 [Google Scholar]
  12. Díaz, L., Bel, A., & Bekiou, K.
    (2008) Interpretable and uninterpretable features in the acquisition of Spanish past tenses. InJ. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp.432–452). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Filip, H.
    (1993) Aspect, situation type and nominal reference. [Doctoral dissertation, UC Berkeley]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6dm5t1tr
  14. (2003) Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 11(1), 55–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. (2005) The telicity parameter revisited. InR. Young (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th semantics and linguistic theory conference (pp.92–109). Cornell University. 10.3765/salt.v14i0.2909
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v14i0.2909 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gabriele, A., & Martohardjono, G.
    (2005) Investigating the role of transfer in the L2 acquisition of aspect. InL. Dekydspotter, R. A. Sprouse, & A. Liljestrand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th generative approaches to second laguage acquisition conference (pp.96–110). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gutiérrez, X.
    (2013) The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 351, 423–449. 10.1017/S0272263113000041
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000041 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jackendoff, R.
    (1997) The architecture of the language faculty. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaku, K.
    (2009) Acquisition of telicity in L2. A psycholinguistic study of Japanese learners of English. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa]. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/29813
  20. Kardos, É.
    (2016) Telicity marking in Hungarian. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1(1), 1–37. 10.5334/gjgl.52
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.52 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, Ch.J., & Neter, J.
    (2005) Applied linear statistical models. 5th edition. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2014) LmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models: R package version 2.0–20. CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
  23. Lardiere, D.
    (2009) Feature assembly in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227. 10.1177/0267658308100283
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100283 [Google Scholar]
  24. Leal, T.
    (2018) Methodological issues concerning proficiency in SLA research. InA. Gudmestad, & A. Edmonds (Eds.), Critical reflections on data in second language acquisition (pp.63–88). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.51.04lea
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.51.04lea [Google Scholar]
  25. Leal, T., Slabakova, R., & Farmer, T.
    (2017) The fine-tuning of linguistic expectations over the course of L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 493–525. 10.1017/S0272263116000164
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000164 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lenth, R. V.
    (2016) Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. 10.18637/jss.v069.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01 [Google Scholar]
  27. MacDonald, J. E.
    (2006) The syntax of inner aspect. [Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University]. Linguistics Stony Brook: https://linguistics.stonybrook.edu/_pdf/dissertation/MacDonald_2006_dissertation_0.pdf
  28. (2008) The syntactic nature of inner aspect. A minimalist perspective. John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.133
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.133 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2009) Inner aspect and phases. InK. Grohmann (Ed.), Explorations of phase theory: Features and arguments (pp.207–230). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213966.207
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213966.207 [Google Scholar]
  30. O’Neill, R., Washburn, G., & Cornelius, E. T.
    (1981) American kernel lessons: Advanced student’s book. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Oravec, J., Bajzíková, E., & Furdík, J.
    (1994) Súčasný slovenský spisovný jazyk. Morfológia. (Modern Standard Slovak. Morphology). Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Cuza, A., Majzlanova, M., & Sánchez-Naranjo, J.
    (2008) Non-native recognition of the iterative and habitual meanings of Spanish preterite and imperfect tenses. InJ. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp.432–453). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Piñango, M. N., Zurif, E., & Jackendoff, R.
    (1999) Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax-semantics interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(4), 395–414. 10.1023/A:1023241115818
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023241115818 [Google Scholar]
  34. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.r-project.org/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Ramchand, G., & Svenonius, P.
    (2008) Mapping a parochial lexicon onto a univeral semantics. InM. T. Biberauer (Ed.), Limits of syntactic variation (pp.219–245). John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.132.08ram
     https://doi.org/10.1075/la.132.08ram [Google Scholar]
  36. Reuland, E.
    (2001) Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(3), 439–492. 10.1162/002438901750372522
     https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901750372522 [Google Scholar]
  37. Richardson, K. R.
    (2007) Case and aspect in Slavic. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291960.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291960.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Roehr-Brackin, K.
    (2018) Metalinguistic awareness and second language acquisition. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315661001
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661001 [Google Scholar]
  39. Slabakova, R.
    (1997a) Zero acquisition: Second language acquisition of the parameter of aspect. [Doctoral dissertation, McGill University]. https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/1r66j2871
  40. (1997b) Bulgarian preverbs. Aspect in phrase structure. Linguistics, 351, 673–704. 10.1515/ling.1997.35.4.673
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.4.673 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2000) L1 transfer revisited: The L2 acquisition of telicity marking in English by Spanish and Bulgarian native speakers. Linguistics, 38(4), 739–770. 10.1515/ling.2000.004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2000.004 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2002) Recent research on the acquisition of aspect. Second Language Research, 18(2), 172–188. 10.1191/0267658302sr202ra
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr202ra [Google Scholar]
  43. (2005) What is so difficult about telicity marking in L2 Russian?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(1), 63–77. 10.1017/S1366728904002093
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904002093 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2009) Features or parameters: Which one makes second language acquisition easier, and more interesting to study?Second Language Research, 25(2), 313–324. 10.1177/0267658308100291
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100291 [Google Scholar]
  45. Slabakova, R., & Montrul, S.
    (2008) Aspectual shifts: Grammatical and pragmatic knowledge in L2 acquisition. InJ. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp.456–483). Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Smith, C. S.
    (1997) The parameter of aspect. Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑5606‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5606-6 [Google Scholar]
  47. Stockall, L., Husband, M. E., & Beretta, A.
    (2010) The online composition of events. InOccasional Papers Advancing Linguistics, 191, 1–32. London: Queen Mary College. Available at: https://www.qmul.ac.uk/sllf/media/sllf-new/department-of-linguistics/19-QMOPAL-Stockall-Husband-Beretta.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Travis, L. M.
    (2010) Inner aspect: The articulation of VP. Springer. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑8550‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8550-4 [Google Scholar]
  49. Wu, M.-J.
    (2018) L1 influence on L2 English telicity judgments. InA. B. Bertolini, & M. J. Kaplan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.803–813). Cascadilla Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.21075.nad
Loading
Telicity judgments in L2 English by L1 Slovak speakers
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14, 775 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21075.nad
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.21075.nad
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.21075.nad
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): English; L2 exposure; L2 proficiency; Slovak; telicity

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error