Cultural attitudes and linguistic processes in Karajá

References

1. Davis, I.
   (1968) Some Macro-Jê relationships. International Journal of American Linguistics, 341, 42–47. 10.1086/464994
   https://doi.org/10.1086/464994 [Google Scholar]
2. Di Sciullo, A-M., de Almeida, R. G., Manouilidou, C., & Dwivedi, V. D.
   (2007, August25). This poster reads clearly: Processing English middle constructions [Poster presentation]. Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing, Turku, Finland.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Fruchter, J., & Marantz, A.
   (2015) Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the full decomposition model of complex visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 1431, 81–96. 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.001 [Google Scholar]
4. Gomes, J. N., Garcia, D. C., & Maia, M.
   (accepted). Non-weird (psycho)linguistic endeavors: Theoretical and applied research with the Karaja people of Central Brazil, Applied Psycholinguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Gomes, J. N., França, A. I., Maia, M., & Rilliard, A.
   (2017) Prosody as a Recursive embedding Tool in Production and Perception of Karajá: an Acoustic and Neuropsycholinguistic Investigation. Journal of Speech Sciences, 5(2), 101–123. 10.20396/joss.v5i2.15069
   https://doi.org/10.20396/joss.v5i2.15069 [Google Scholar]
6. Grenoble, L., & Osipov, B.
   (2023) The dynamics of bilingualism in language shift ecologies. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 13(1). 10.1075/lab.22035.gre
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22035.gre [Google Scholar]
7. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A.
   (2010) The WEIRDest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X [Google Scholar]
8. Keyser, S., & Roeper, T.
   (1984) On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 151, 381–416.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Maia, M.
   (2007) Manual de Linguística: Subsídios para a formação de professores indígenas na área de linguagem. Brasília: MEC/UNESCO.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Maia, M.
    (2021) Non-WEIRD experimental field work as bricolage: a discourse on methods in the investigation of deixis and coreference in the Karajá language of Central Brazil. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 51, 1–12. 10.1007/s41809‑021‑00083‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-021-00083-8 [Google Scholar]
11. Maia, M., França, A., Gesualdi-Manhães, A., Lage, A., Oliveira, C., Soto, M., & Gomes, J. N.
    (2018) The Processing of PP Embedding and Coordination in Karajá and in Portuguese. InL. Amaral, M. Maia, A. Nevins, & T. Roeper (Eds.), Recursion across Domains (pp. 334–356). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108290708.020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290708.020 [Google Scholar]
12. Maia, M., Oliveira, R. C. De, Santos, S.
    (2015) Este título leria mais claramente em Karajá do que em Xavante ou em Português: um estudo comparativo sobre o processamento da alternância causativa. InL. Storto, B. Franchetto, & S. Lima. (Eds.). Sintaxe e semântica do verbo em línguas indígenas do Brasil (pp. 197–220), Mercado das Letras.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Maia, M.
    (2018) The processing of causative alternation structures by Karajá/Brazilian Portuguese bilinguals: new eye-tracking evidence. InB. Hollebrandse, J. Kim, A. T. Pérez-Leroux, & P. Schulz. (Eds.). T.O.M and Grammar. Thoughts on Mind and Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Tom Roeper. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (UMOP), 411, 73–88.
    [Google Scholar]
14. UNESCO Project: Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger
    UNESCO Project: Atlas of the World’s Languages in Danger. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000192416