A theory of Ln grammars

References

1. Flynn, S., & O’Neil, W.
   (1988) Introduction. InS. Flynn, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp.1–24). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2733‑9_1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2733-9_1 [Google Scholar]
2. Gürel, A.
   (2022) Enriching SLA research with data from less commonly taught languages. InÖ. Özcelik, & A. K. Kent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Central Asian Languages and Linguistics (ConCALL-4), (pp.21–30), IUScholarWorks.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Lardiere, D.
   (1998a) Case and tense in the ‘fossilization’ steady state. Second Language Research, 141, 1–26. 10.1191/026765898674105303
   https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898674105303 [Google Scholar]
4. Lardiere, D.
   (1998b) Disassociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 141, 359–375. 10.1191/026765898672500216
   https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898672500216 [Google Scholar]
5. Lardiere, D.
   (2008) Feature-reassembly in second language acquisition. InJ. M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp.107–140). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Lardiere, D.
   (2009) Some thoughts on a contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 251, 173–227. 10.1177/0267658308100283
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100283 [Google Scholar]
7. Lardiere, D.
   (2016) Missing the trees for the forest: Morphology in second language acquisition. Second Language, 151, 5–28.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Lohndal, T., & Putnam, M. T.
   (2024) The importance of features and exponents: Dissolving Feature Reassembly. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 14(1).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lohndal, T., Rothman, J., Kupisch, T., & Westergaard, M.
   (2019) Heritage language acquisition: What it reveals and why it is important for formal linguistic theories. Language and Linguistics Compass, 131, e12357. 10.1111/lnc3.12357
   https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12357 [Google Scholar]
10. Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R.
    (2018) The generative approach to SLA and its place in modern second language studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 417–442. 10.1017/S0272263117000134
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000134 [Google Scholar]
11. Slabakova, R.
    (2016) Second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Spinner, P., & Gass, S.
    (2015) Second language acquisition and linguistics: A bidirectional perspective. Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), 227–233. 10.1515/lingvan‑2014‑1010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2014-1010 [Google Scholar]
13. White, L.
    (1989) Universal grammar and second language acquisition. John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/lald.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.1 [Google Scholar]
14. White, L.
    (1996) Universal grammar and second language acquisition: Current trends and new directions. InW. Ritchie, & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.85–120). Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. White, L.
    (2003a) Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 129–141. 10.1017/S1366728903001081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001081 [Google Scholar]
16. White, L.
    (2003b) Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815065
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065 [Google Scholar]