1887
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
Preview this article:

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Comment

This is a commentary article in response to the following content:
The importance of features and exponents
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.23064.gar
2024-02-01
2024-12-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lab.23064.gar.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lab.23064.gar&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aronoff, M.
    (1994) Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Asudeh, A., & Siddiqi, D.
    (forthc.). Morphology in LFG. InM. Dalrymple Ed. The Handbook of Lexical Functional Grammar. Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauer, L.
    (2004) The function of word-formation and the inflection-derivation distinction. InH. Aertsen, M. Hannay, & R. Lyall (Eds.), Words in their places: A festschrift for J. Lachlan Mackenzie (pp.283–292). Vrije Universiteit.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beard, R.
    (1995) Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. SUNY series in linguistics. State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonami, O., & Stump, G.
    (2016) Paradigm Function Morphology. InA. Hippisley & G. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology (pp.449–481). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139814720.017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139814720.017 [Google Scholar]
  6. Booij, G. E.
    (1993) Against split morphology. InG. E. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993 (pp.27–50). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3712‑8_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3712-8_2 [Google Scholar]
  7. (1996) Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. InG. E. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995 (pp.1–16). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3716‑6_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Corbett, G. G.
    (2012) Features. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139206983
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139206983 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dokulil, M.
    (1962) Tvoření slov v c̆eštině, vol. 1: Teorie odvozování slov. Nakladatelství Československé Akademie Věd.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gardani, F.
    (2008) Borrowing of inflectional morphemes in language contact. Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑04373‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04373-0 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2012) Plural across inflection and derivation, fusion and agglutination. InL. Johanson & M. I. Robbeets (Eds.), Copies versus cognates in bound morphology (pp.71–97). Brill. 10.1163/9789004230477_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004230477_005 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2018) On morphological borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(10), e12302 [1–17]. 10.1111/lnc3.12302
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12302 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2020) Borrowing matter and pattern in morphology. An overview. Morphology, 30(4), 263–282. 10.1007/s11525‑020‑09371‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09371-5 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2021) On how morphology spreads. Word Structure, 14(2), 129–147. 10.3366/word.2021.0184
    https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2021.0184 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2022) Contact and borrowing. InA. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Romance linguistics (pp.845–869). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108580410.034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580410.034 [Google Scholar]
  16. Jackendoff, R.
    (1997) The architecture of the language faculty. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jackendoff, R., & Audring, J.
    (2020) The texture of the lexicon: Relational morphology and the parallel architecture. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaplan, R. M.
    (1995) The formal architecture of Lexical-Functional Grammar. InM. Dalrymple, R. M. Kaplan, J. T. Maxwell III, & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Formal issues in lexical-functional grammar (pp.7–27). CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuryłowicz, J.
    (1936) Dérivation lexicale et dérivation syntaxique: Contribution à la théorie des parties du discours. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris, 371, 79–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lardiere, D.
    (2008) Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. InJ. M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp.106–140). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lohndal, T. & Putnam, M.
    (2024) The importance of features and exponents: Dissolving Feature Reassembly. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 14(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sadock, J. M.
    (1991) Autolexical syntax: A theory of parallel grammatical representations. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (2011) The modular architecture of grammar. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511997587
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997587 [Google Scholar]
  24. Sproat, R.
    (1996) Review of Robert Beard. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 32(2), 497–504. 10.1017/S002222670001598X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670001598X [Google Scholar]
  25. Stump, G. T.
    (2001) Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486333
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486333 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.23064.gar
Loading
  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error