1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
  4. Volume 15, Issue 6
  5. Article
Volume 15, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

While scalar inferences associated with have featured in most of the past investigations into L2 implicature derivation, this study examines acquisition of pragmatic inferences licensed by adjective pairs (e.g., <>, <>). Previous work has focused mainly on direct scalar implicatures where an utterance containing a weak scalar term implicates the negation of the stronger. This work extends the investigation to include focus on two additional inference types: indirect scalar implicatures, where conveys , and negative strengthening, a type of manner implicature where results in a interpretation. Using an inference-judgment paradigm, we test the interplay of these three inference types in adjectival scales for French speakers and L2 French learners and find that response behavior is modulated by the availability of alternative meanings for each participant group. L2 learners demonstrated familiarity with direct and indirect scalar implicature but lack awareness of negative strengthening. We interpret these results by highlighting the role of processing complexity as well as pragmatic competence and proficiency. Overall, this study makes an empirical contribution to the field of L2 acquisition and adds to building a more encompassing understanding of mechanisms that are often assumed to be universal in language acquisition.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24020.des
2024-12-16
2026-07-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lab.24020.des
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lab.24020.des.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24020.des&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baker, R., Doran, R., McNabb, Y., Larson, M., & Ward, G.
    (2009) On the Non-Unified Nature of Scalar Implicature: An Empirical Investigation. International Review of Pragmatics, 1(2), 211–248. 10.1163/187730909X12538045489854
     https://doi.org/10.1163/187730909X12538045489854 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beltrama, A., & Xiang, M.
    (2013) Is good better than excellent? An experimental investigation on scalar implicatures and gradable adjectives. InE. Chemla, V. Homer & G. Winterstein (Eds), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung171, (pp.81–98).
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Benz, A., Bombi, C., & Gotzner, N.
    (2018) Scalar diversity and negative strengthening. InU. Sauerland, & S. Solt (Eds). Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, Vol.11, (pp.191–204). 10.21248/zaspil.60.2018.462
     https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.60.2018.462 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carlson, L.
    (1985) Dialogue games. Springer eBooks. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑3963‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3963-0 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cho, J.
    (2024) Scalar implicatures in adult L2 learners: A self-paced reading study. Second Language Research, 02676583221134058. 10.1177/02676583221134058
     https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221134058 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cummins, C., & Rohde, H.
    (2015) Evoking Context with Contrastive Stress: Effects on Pragmatic Enrichment. Frontiers in Psychology, 61. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01779. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01779
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01779 [Google Scholar]
  8. Doran, R., Ward, G., McNabb, Y., Larson, M., & Baker, R. E.
    (2012) A novel paradigm for distinguishing between what is said and what is implicated. Language, 881, 124–154. 10.1353/lan.2012.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0008 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dupuy, L., Stateva, P., Andreetta, S., Cheylus, A., Déprez, V., Henst, J.-B. van der, Jayez, J., Stepanov, A., & Reboul, A.
    (2019) Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals: The case of scalar implicatures. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(2), 314–340. 10.1075/lab.17017.dup
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17017.dup [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, R.
    (2005) Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. InEllis, R. (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.3–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11.03ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.03ell [Google Scholar]
  11. Feng, S., & Cho, J.
    (2019) Asymmetries between direct and indirect scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 101. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00877
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00877 [Google Scholar]
  12. Feng, S.
    (2022) L2 tolerance of pragmatic violations of informativeness: Evidence from ad hoc implicatures and contrastive inference. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 14(2), 147–177. 10.1075/lab.21064.fen
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21064.fen [Google Scholar]
  13. Gotzner, N., Solt, S., & Benz, A.
    (2018) Scalar diversity, negative strengthening, and adjectival semantics. Frontiers in Psychology, 91. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01659
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01659 [Google Scholar]
  14. Horn, L.
    (1972) On the semantic properties of logical operators in English (Ph.D. dissertation). University of California Los Angeles.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, Y. T., Spelke, E., & Snedeker, J.
    (2013) What exactly do numbers mean?Language Learning and Development, 9(2), 105–129. 10.1080/15475441.2012.658731
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2012.658731 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kennedy, C.
    (2007) Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(1), 1–45. 10.1007/s10988‑006‑9008‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kennedy, C., & McNally, L.
    (2005) Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language, 81(2), 345–381. 10.1353/lan.2005.0071
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071 [Google Scholar]
  18. Khorsheed, A., Rashid, S. M., Nimehchisalem, V., Imm, L. G., Price, J., & Ronderos, C. R.
    (2022) What second-language speakers can tell us about pragmatic processing. PLOS ONE, 17(2): e0263724. 10.1371/journal.pone.0263724
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263724 [Google Scholar]
  19. Leech, G.
    (1983) Principles of pragmatics (1st ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315835976
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835976 [Google Scholar]
  20. Leffel, T., Cremers, A., Gotzner, N., & Romoli, J.
    (2019) Vagueness in implicature: The case of modified adjectives. Journal of Semantics, 36(2), 317–348. 10.1093/jos/ffy020
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffy020 [Google Scholar]
  21. Levinson, S. C.
    (2000) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin, Y.
    (2016) Processing of scalar inferences by Mandarin learners of English: An online measure. PloS One, 11(1): e0145494. 10.1371/journal.pone.0145494
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145494 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mazzaggio, G., Panizza, D., & Surian, L.
    (2021) On the interpretation of scalar implicatures in first and second language. Journal of Pragmatics, 1711, 62–75. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  24. Meister, I. G., Buelte, D., Sparing, R., & Boroojerdi, B.
    (2007) A repetition suppression effect lasting several days within the semantic network. Experimental Brain Research, 183(3), 371–376. 10.1007/s00221‑007‑1051‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1051-8 [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller, D., Giancaspro, D., Iverson, M., Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R.
    (2016) Not just algunos, but indeed unos L2ers can acquire scalar implicatures in L2 Spanish. InA. Alba de la Fuente, E. Valenzuela, & C. Martínez Sanz (Eds.), Language Acquisition Beyond Parameters: Studies in honour of Juana M. Liceras (pp.125–145). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.51.06mil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.51.06mil [Google Scholar]
  26. Pankratz, E., & Tiel, B. V.
    (2021) The role of relevance for scalar diversity: A usage-based approach. Language and Cognition, 13(4), 562–594. 10.1017/langcog.2021.13
     https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2021.13 [Google Scholar]
  27. Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J.
    (2003) Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics- pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86(3), 253–282. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00179‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00179-8 [Google Scholar]
  28. Rotstein, C., & Winter, Y.
    (2004) Total Adjectives vs. Partial Adjectives: Scale Structure and Higher-Order Modifiers. Natural Language Semantics, 12(3), 259–288. 10.1023/B:NALS.0000034517.56898.9a
     https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALS.0000034517.56898.9a [Google Scholar]
  29. Slabakova, R.
    (2010) Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua, 1201, 2444–2462. 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  30. Smeets, L., & Meroni, L.
    (2020) Stress or context for the computation of scalar implicatures. InP. Guijarro-Fuentes & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), New Trends in Language Acquisition Within the Generative Perspective (pp.313–331). Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑024‑1932‑0_13
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1932-0_13 [Google Scholar]
  31. Snape, N. & Hosoi, H.
    (2018) Acquisition of scalar implicatures: Evidence from adult Japanese L2 learners of English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 81, 163–192. 10.1075/lab.18010.sna
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18010.sna [Google Scholar]
  32. Solt, S.
    (2011) Notes on the comparison class. InR. Nouwen, R. van Rooij, U. Sauerland, & H.-C. Schmitz (Eds.), Vagueness in Communication (pp.189–206). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑18446‑8_11
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_11 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sorace, A.
    (2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. 10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor [Google Scholar]
  34. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
    (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Syrett, K., Austin, J., Sanchez, L., Germak, C., Lingwall, A., Perez-Cortes, S., Arias-Amaya, A., & Baker, H.
    (2016) The influence of conversational context and the developing lexicon on the calculation of scalar implicatures: Insights from Spanish–English bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7(2), 230–264. 10.1075/lab.14019.syr
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.14019.syr [Google Scholar]
  36. Tremblay, A.
    (2011) Proficiency assessment standards in second language acquisition research: “closing” the gap. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 339–372. 10.1017/S0272263111000015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000015 [Google Scholar]
  37. van Tiel, B., van Miltenburg, E., Zevakhina, N., & Geurts, B.
    (2016) Scalar diversity. Journal of Semantics, 33(1), 137–175. 10.1093/jos/ffu017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffu017 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24020.des
Loading
Scalar diversity in L2 French speakers
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 15, 843 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24020.des
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24020.des
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24020.des
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): diversity; French; inferences; scalar implicatures; second language acquisition

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error