1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
  4. Volume 16, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Bilingualism has sometimes been associated with cognitive boosts, particularly in working memory (WM). However, it remains unclear whether such benefits extend to the comprehension of syntactically complex structures. We investigated this through a gamified character-selection task assessing comprehension of subject-relative clauses and object-relative clauses among monolingual ( = 31) and bilingual ( = 28) French-speaking children, as well as monolingual ( = 45) and bilingual ( = 43) German-speaking children aged 3 to 12. We examined whether comprehension correlated with verbal WM, measured through a nonword repetition task, and interference resolution ability, assessed through a Simon task and an analysis of comprehension errors. The results indicated no bilingual advantage: object-relative clauses were more difficult than subject-relative clauses across all groups and languages. While interference-related errors — misinterpreting object-relative clauses as subject-relative clauses more frequently than vice versa — surfaced in all groups, verbal WM correlated with object-relative comprehension only in French. These findings are discussed in relation to current theories of bilingualism and WM in language comprehension.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24037.sol
2025-07-17
2026-05-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lab.24037.sol
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lab.24037.sol.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24037.sol&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adams, A. M., & Gathercole, S. E.
    (2000) Limitations in working memory: implications for language development. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35(1), 95–116. 10.1080/136828200247278
     https://doi.org/10.1080/136828200247278 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arosio, F., Guasti, M. T., Stucchi, N.
    (2011) Disambiguating information and memory resources in children’s processing of Italian RCs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 401, 137–154. 10.1007/s10936‑010‑9160‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-010-9160-0 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arosio, F., Yatsushiro, K., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T.
    (2012) Morphological information and memory resources in children’s processing of relative clauses in German. Language Learning and Development, 8(4), 340–364. 10.1080/15475441.2011.634691
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2011.634691 [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkinson, E., Wagers, M. W., Lidz, J., Phillips, C., & Omaki, A.
    (2018) Developing incrementality in filler-gap dependency processing. Cognition, 1791, 132–149. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.022
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.022 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baddeley, A. D., Eysenck, M. W., & Anderson, M. C.
    (2009) Memory. Psychology Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J.
    (1974) Working memory. InG. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press. 10.1016/S0079‑7421(08)60452‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barouillet, P., & Camos, V.
    (2007) Le développement de la mémoire de travail. InJ. Lautrey (Ed.), Psychologie du développement et de l’éducation (pp.51–86). Presses Universitaires.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J.
    (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bentea, A., Durrleman, S., & Rizzi, L.
    (2016) Refining intervention: The acquisition of featural relations in object A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 1691, 21–41. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., Grady, C., Chau, W., Ishii, R., Gunji, A., & Pantev, C.
    (2005) Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: Evidence from MEG. NeuroImage, 24(1), 40–49. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.044
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.044 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., & Luk, G.
    (2012) Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240–25. 10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brandt, S., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M.
    (2016) German children’s use of word order and case marking to interpret simple and complex sentences: Testing differences between constructions and lexical items. Language Learning and Development, 12(2), 156–182. 10.1080/15475441.2015.1052448
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2015.1052448 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cantone, K. F.
    (2022) Language exposure in early bilingual and trilingual acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(3), 402–417. 10.1080/14790718.2019.1703995
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1703995 [Google Scholar]
  15. Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J.
    (1982) Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33(3), 386–404. 10.1016/0022‑0965(82)90054‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(82)90054-6 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chomsky, N.
    (1995) The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Contemori, C., & Marinis, T.
    (2014) The impact of number mismatch and passives on the real-time processing of relative clauses. Journal of Child Language41(3), 658–689. 10.1017/S0305000913000172
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000913000172 [Google Scholar]
  18. De Cat, C., Gusnanto, A., & Serratrice, L.
    (2018) Identifying a threshold for the executive function advantage in bilingual children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 119–151. 10.1017/S0272263116000486
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000486 [Google Scholar]
  19. De Cat, C., Kašćelan, D., Prévost, P., Serratrice, L., Tuller, L., & Unsworth, S.
    (2022) Quantifying Bilingual EXperience (Q-BEx): Questionnaire manual and documentation. https://osf.io/v7ec8/
  20. Delage, H., & Frauenfelder, U. H.
    (2019) Syntax and working memory in typically-developing children: Focus on syntactic complexity. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 10(2), 141–176. 10.1075/lia.18013.del
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.18013.del [Google Scholar]
  21. Delage, H., Stanford, E., & Durrleman, S.
    (2021) Working memory training enhances complex syntax in children with Developmental Language Disorder. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(5), 1341–1375. 10.1017/S0142716421000369
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000369 [Google Scholar]
  22. De Villiers, J. G., Tager Flusberg, H. B., Hakuta, K., & Cohen, M.
    (1979) Children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8(5), 499–518. 10.1007/BF01067332
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067332 [Google Scholar]
  23. Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M.
    (2005) A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language81(1), 882–906. 10.1353/lan.2005.0169
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0169 [Google Scholar]
  24. Donnelly, S., Brooks, P., & Homer, B.
    (2015) Examining the bilingual advantage on conflict resolution tasks: A meta-analysis. InProceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. (2019) Is there a bilingual advantage on interference-control tasks? A multiverse meta-analysis of global reaction time and interference cost. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 26(4), 1122–1147. 10.3758/s13423‑019‑01567‑z
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01567-z [Google Scholar]
  26. Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., Mecklinger, A., & Meyer, M.
    (1998) Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology, 47(3), 193–221. 10.1016/S0301‑0511(97)00033‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(97)00033-1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gaulin, C., & Campbell, T.
    (1994) Procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children: Some preliminary data. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 791, 55–64. 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.55
     https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.55 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gibson, E.
    (1998) Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(98)00034‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2000) The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. InA. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, and W. O’Neil. (Eds.), Image, Language, Brain (pp.95–126). MIT Press. 1.7551/mitpress/3654.003.0008
     https://doi.org/1.7551/mitpress/3654.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M.
    (2001) Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition27(6), 1411–1423.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. (2004) Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity. Journal of Memory and Language511, 97–114. 10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  32. Grosjean, F., & Li, P.
    (2013) The Psycholinguistics of bilingualism. Wiley. https://books.google.com/books?id=3IumBMf-DJAC
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Grundy, J. G.
    (2020) The effects of bilingualism on executive functions: An updated quantitative analysis. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 4(2), 177–199. 10.1007/s41809‑020‑00062‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-020-00062-5 [Google Scholar]
  34. Grundy, J. G., & Timmer, K.
    (2017) Bilingualism and working memory capacity: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Second Language Research, 33(3), 325–340. 10.1177/0267658316678286
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316678286 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hamdani, S., Chan, A., Kan, R., Chiat, S., Gagarina, N., Haman, E., Łuniewska, M., Polisenska, K., & Armon-Lotem, S.
    (2024) Identifying developmental language disorder (DLD) in multilingual children: A case study tutorial. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1–15. 1.1080/17549507.2024.2326095
     https://doi.org/1.1080/17549507.2024.2326095 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hantman, R. M., Choi, B., Hartwick, K., Nadler, Z., & Luk, G.
    (2023) A systematic review of bilingual experiences, labels, and descriptions in autism spectrum disorder research. Frontiers in Psychology, 141, Article 1095164. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095164
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095164 [Google Scholar]
  37. Holmes, V. M., & O’Regan, J. K.
    (1981) Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative-clause sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(4), 417–443. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(81)90533‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90533-8 [Google Scholar]
  38. Jäger, L. A., Engelmann, F., & Vasishth, S.
    (2017) Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 941, 316–339. 10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kim, H., & Park, S. H.
    (2024) Second language acquisition of morphosyntactic and discourse functions of case markers in Korean. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. Advance online publication. 10.1075/lab.23020.kim
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.23020.kim [Google Scholar]
  40. Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bogulski, C. A., & Kroff, J. R. V.
    (2012) Juggling two languages in one mind: What bilinguals tell us about language processing and its consequences for cognition. InB. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol.561, pp.229–262). Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Lau, E., & Tanaka, N.
    (2021) The subject advantage in relative clauses: A review. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 6(1). 1.5334/gjgl.1343
     https://doi.org/1.5334/gjgl.1343 [Google Scholar]
  42. Monnier, C., Boiché, J., Armandon, P., Baudoin, S., & Bellocchi, S.
    (2022) Is bilingualism associated with better working memory capacity? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(6), 2229–2255. 10.1080/13670050.2021.1908220
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1908220 [Google Scholar]
  43. Morales, J., Calvo, A., & Bialystok, E.
    (2013) Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(2), 187–202. 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  44. Paap, K., Johnson, H., & Sawi, O.
    (2015) Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 691, 265–278. 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.014 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pliatsikas, C., DeLuca, V., Moschopoulou, E., & Saddy, J. D.
    (2017) Immersive bilingualism reshapes the core of the brain. Brain Structure and Function, 222(4), 1785–1795. 10.1007/s00429‑016‑1307‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-016-1307-9 [Google Scholar]
  46. Poll, G. H., Miller, C. A., Mainela-Arnold, E., Adams, K. D., Misra, M., & Park, J. S.
    (2013) Effects of children’s working memory capacity and processing speed on their sentence imitation performance. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48(3), 329–342. 10.1111/1460‑6984.12014
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12014 [Google Scholar]
  47. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: www.R-project.org (accessedApril 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Rizzi, L.
    (1990) Relativized minimality. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. (2004) Locality and left periphery. InA. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structure, Vol. 3 (223–251). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0008
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  50. Sahlén, B., Reuterskiold-Wagner, C., Nettelbladt, U., & Radeborg, K.
    (1999) Non-word repetition in children with language impairment-pitfalls and possibilities. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 34(3), 337–352. 10.1080/136828299247441
     https://doi.org/10.1080/136828299247441 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., & Kuhn, K.
    (1995) The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(4), 499–452. 10.1006/jmla.1995.1023
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1023 [Google Scholar]
  52. Simon, J. R.
    (1969) Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 174–176. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/1.1037/h0027448. 10.1037/h0027448
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027448 [Google Scholar]
  53. Solaimani, E., & Marefat, H.
    (2024) Definiteness matters as a discourse cue in L1 and L2 processing of relative clauses. Pragmatics & Cognition, 31(1), 185–204. 10.1075/pc.00044.sol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00044.sol [Google Scholar]
  54. Surrain, S., & Luk, G.
    (2019) Describing bilinguals: A systematic review of labels and descriptions used in the literature between 2005–2015. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(2), 401–415. 10.1017/S1366728917000682
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000682 [Google Scholar]
  55. Thorn, A., & Gathercole, S.
    (1999) Language-specific knowledge and short-term memory in bilingual and non-bilingual children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 521, 303–324. 10.1080/713755823
     https://doi.org/10.1080/713755823 [Google Scholar]
  56. Tomić, A., Rodina, Y., Bayram, F., & De Cat, C.
    (2024) Individual language experience determinants of morphosyntactic variation in heritage and attriting speakers of Bosnian and Serbian: A causal inference approach. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. Advance online publication. 10.1075/lab.24016.tom
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24016.tom [Google Scholar]
  57. Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E.
    (2002) Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 69–90. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2836
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2836 [Google Scholar]
  58. Ueno, M., & Garnsey, S. M.
    (2008) An ERP study of the processing of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(5), 646–688. 10.1080/01690960701653501
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701653501 [Google Scholar]
  59. Valian, V.
    (2015) Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(1), 3–24. 10.1017/S1366728914000522
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000522 [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Dyke, J. A., & Johns, C. L.
    (2012) Memory interference as a determinant of language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(4), 193–211. 10.1002/lnc3.330
     https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.330 [Google Scholar]
  61. Vasishth, S., Chen, Z., Li, Q., & Guo, G.
    (2013) Processing Chinese relative clauses: Evidence for the subject-relative advantage. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e77006. 10.1371/journal.pone.0077006
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077006 [Google Scholar]
  62. Willis, C. S., & Gathercole, S. E.
    (2001) Phonological short-term memory contributions to sentence processing in young children. Memory, 9(4–6), 349–363. 10.1080/09658210143000155
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210143000155 [Google Scholar]
  63. Yadav, H., Paape, D., Smith, G., Dillon, B. W., & Vasishth, S.
    (2022) Individual differences in cue weighting in sentence comprehension: An evaluation using Approximate Bayesian Computation. Open Mind, 61, 1–24. 10.1162/opmi_a_00052
     https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00052 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24037.sol
Loading
Bilingualism, working memory, and relative clause comprehension in children
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 16, 171 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24037.sol
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24037.sol
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24037.sol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): bilingualism; child language acquisition; relative clauses; working memory

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error