1887
image of Does structural priming lead to contact-induced language change?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Subject pronoun expression (SPE) has been extensively investigated in studies of language contact, with studies finding higher rates of SPE in consistent null subject languages that are in contact with non-null subject languages. Recent studies have explored the role of structural priming in these processes of language change by analyzing different language pairs and societal contexts. We contribute to this line of research by examining the role of structural priming on the SPE rates of three groups of Spanish–English bilinguals: a group of 40 heritage speakers of Spanish living in the U.S., a group of 35 first-generation immigrants from Spanish-speaking countries also living in the U.S., and a group of 60 monolingually-raised speakers of Spanish living in a Spanish-speaking country. Participants completed two production experiments (one with a within-language priming treatment and one with a cross-linguistic priming treatment) as well as a task to control for language dominance. Results showed that SPE rates were significantly higher in the within-language condition than in the cross-linguistic condition. However, the effect did not extend to a post-test task in either experiment. Between-group differences were only found in the within-language condition, with heritage speakers producing the highest SPE rates. Language dominance was not significant.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24040.hur
2025-09-19
2026-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baroncini, I., Michelotti, A., & Engemann, H.
    (2025) Priming motion events in Italian heritage language speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.24048.bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24048.bar [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, , –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayley, R., Pease-Álvarez, L., Cárdenas, N., Treviño Schouten, B., & Martín Vélez Salas, C.
    (2012) Spanish dialect contact in San Antonio, Texas: An exploratory study. InK. Geeslin, & M. Díaz-Campos (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. –). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R., & Pickering, M.
    (2013) From language-specific to shared syntactic representations: The influence of second language proficiency on syntactic sharing in bilinguals. Cognition, , –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Birdsong, D., Gertken, L., & Amengual, M.
    (2012) Bilingual Language Profile: An easy to use instrument to assess bilingualism. COERLL, University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bock, K.
    (1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, (), –. 10.1016/0010‑0285(86)90004‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bock, K., & Griffin, Z.
    (2000) The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/0096‑3445.129.2.177
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carando, A.
    (2015) The emergence of L1 innovations in Spanish–English bilinguals: Evidence from cross-linguistic structural priming. Doctoral dissertation: City University of New York.
  9. Chamorro, G., Sturt, P., & Sorace, A.
    (2016) Selectivity in L1 attrition: Differential object marking in Spanish near-native speakers of English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, (), –. 10.1007/s10936‑015‑9372‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9372-4 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chang, F.
    (2008) Implicit learning as a mechanism of language change. Theoretical Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/THLI.2008.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2008.009 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chia, K., & Kaschak, M.
    (2022) It’s not you, it’s me: Some speakers elicit structural priming more reliably than others. Collabra: Psychology, (), . 10.1525/collabra.36312
    https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.36312 [Google Scholar]
  12. Contemori, C., & Minjarez Oppenheimer, N.
    (2022) Changing pronoun interpretations across-languages: Discourse priming in Spanish–English bilingual speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728922000566
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000566 [Google Scholar]
  13. Coumel, M., Muylle, M., Messenger, K., & Hartsuiker, R.
    (2023) The role of explicit memory across second language syntactic development: A structural priming study. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12604
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12604 [Google Scholar]
  14. de Prada Pérez, A.
    (2018) Subject pronoun expression and language mode in bilingual Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/shll‑2018‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2018-0010 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fernández, E., de Souza, R., & Carando, A.
    (2016) Bilingual innovations: Experimental evidence offers cues regarding the psycholinguistics of language change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728916000924
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000924 [Google Scholar]
  16. Foltz, A.
    (2022) Beyond the English passive: What can we learn from syntactic priming about L1 acquisition by exploring other structures and languages?InK. Messenger (Ed.), Syntactic priming in language acquisition: Representations, mechanisms and applications (pp. –). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.31.03fol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.31.03fol [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartsuiker, R., Pickering, M., & Veltkamp, E.
    (2004) Is syntax separate or shared between languages?: Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish–English bilinguals. Psychological Science, (), –. 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2004.00693.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00693.x [Google Scholar]
  18. Hartsuiker, R., Beerts, S., Loncke, M., Desmet, T., & Bernolet, S.
    (2016) Cross-linguistic structural priming in multilinguals: Further evidence for shared syntax. Journal of Memory and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hartsuiker, R., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D.
    (2008) Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  20. Heyselaar, E., & Segaert, K.
    (2022) Structural priming persists for (at least) one month in young adults, but not in healthy older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –. 10.1037/xlm0001123
    https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001123 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hicks, G., & Domínguez, L.
    (2019) A model for L1 grammatical attrition. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658319862011
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319862011 [Google Scholar]
  22. Holmberg, A.
    (2005) Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, (), –. 10.1162/002438905774464322
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464322 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hopper, P., & Traugott, E.
    (2003) Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hurtado, I., & Montrul, S.
    (2021) Priming dative clitics in spoken Spanish as a second and heritage language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263120000716
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000716 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2025) Is structural priming a possible mechanism of language change in heritage language grammars? Some evidence from accusative clitic doubling in Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, –. 10.1017/S1366728924001032
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728924001032 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jaeger, F.
    (2008) Categorical data analyses: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2009) Random effects: Should I stay or should I go?https://hlplab.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/random-effect-structure/
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jäger, G., & Rosenbach, A.
    (2008) Priming and unidirectional language change. Theoretical Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/THLI.2008.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2008.008 [Google Scholar]
  29. Joseph, B., & Janda, R.
    (2003) The handbook of historical linguistics. Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kantola, L., & van Gompel, R.
    (2011) Between- and within-language priming is the same: Evidence for shared bilingual syntactic representations. Memory & Cognition, , –. 10.3758/s13421‑010‑0016‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0016-5 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaschak, M., Kutta, T., & Schatschneider, C.
    (2011) Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) a week. Memory and Cognition, , –. 10.3758/s13421‑010‑0042‑3
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0042-3 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kootstra, G., & Doedens, W.
    (2016) How multiple sources of experience influence bilingual syntactic choice: Immediate and cumulative cross-language effects of structural priming, verb bias, and language dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728916000420
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000420 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kupisch, T. & Polinsky, M.
    (2022) Language history on the fast forward: Innovations in heritage languages and diachronic change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, , –. 10.1017/S1366728921000997
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000997 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lastra, Y., & Butragueño, P. M.
    (2015) Subject pronoun expression in oral Mexican Spanish. InA. Carvalho, R. Orozco, & N. Shin (Eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish (pp. –). Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lenth, R., Bolker, B., Buerkner, P., Giné-Vázquez, I., Herve, M., Jung, M., Love, J., Miguez, F., Piaskowski, J., Riebl, H., & Singmann, H.
    (2024) Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka. Least-squares means. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html#:~:text=10.32614/CRAN.package.emmeans
  36. Mahowald, K., James, A., Futrell, R., & Gibson, E.
    (2016) A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  37. McDonough, K., Kielstra, P., Crowther, D., & Smith, G.
    (2016) Structural priming in L2 speech production: Examining relationships among English L2 speakers’ production, cognitive abilities, and awareness. InA. Mackey, & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. –). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Meisel, J.
    (2011) Bilingual language acquisition and theories of diachronic change: Bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728910000143
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000143 [Google Scholar]
  39. Montrul, S.
    (2016) The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139030502
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030502 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2022) Native speakers, interrupted: Differential object marking and grammatical change in heritage languages. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316459690
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459690 [Google Scholar]
  41. Poplack, S., & Levey, S.
    (2010) Contact-induced grammatical change: A cautionary tale. InP. Auer, & J. E. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation (pp. –). Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Putnam, M.
    (2019) The (in)stability of grammars. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263119000299
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000299 [Google Scholar]
  43. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R., & Pickering, M.
    (2007) The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, , –. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  45. Shin, J., & Christianson, K.
    (2012) Structural priming and second language learning. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00657.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00657.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Silva-Corvalán, C.
    (1994) Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198242871.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198242871.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sodaci, H., Backus, A., & Kootstra, G.
    (2019) Role of structural priming in contact-induced change: Subject pronoun expression in L1 Turkish by Turkish–Dutch bilinguals. 10.31234/osf.io/2uxej
    https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2uxej [Google Scholar]
  48. Tooley, K., & Traxler, M.
    (2010) Syntactic priming effects in comprehension: A critical review. Language and Linguistics Compass, (), –. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00249.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00249.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Torres-Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C.
    (2015) Foundations for the study of subject pronoun expression in Spanish in contact with English: Assessing interlinguistic (dis)similarity via intralinguistic variability. InA. Carvalho, R. Orozco, & N. Lapidus (Eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish (pp. –). Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (2016) Two languages, one effect: Structural priming in spontaneous code-switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728914000406
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000406 [Google Scholar]
  51. Travis, C., Torres-Cacoullos, R., & Kidd, E.
    (2017) Cross-language priming: A view from bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728915000127
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000127 [Google Scholar]
  52. Unsworth, S.
    (2025) Shared syntax and cross-linguistic influence in bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.22093.uns
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22093.uns [Google Scholar]
  53. Van Gompel, R., & Arai, M.
    (2018) Structural priming in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728917000542
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000542 [Google Scholar]
  54. Vicente, M., Calandruccio, L., Miller, M., Browning, J., Oleson, J., & Leibold, L.
    (2019) Language proficiency and dominance considerations when working with Spanish–English bilingual adults. American Journal of Audiology, (), –. 10.1044/2019_AJA‑19‑0028
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJA-19-0028 [Google Scholar]
  55. Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M.
    (1968) Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InW. P. Lehmann, & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics (pp. –). University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wheeldon, L., & Smith, M.
    (2003) Phrase structure priming: A short-lived effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01690960244000063
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960244000063 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24040.hur
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24040.hur
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: heritage speakers ; language change ; subject pronoun expression ; structural priming
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error