1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of More evidence on the unergative–unaccusative distinction in second language grammars
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study presents new evidence for the structural unergative–unaccusative distinction, in second language (L2) grammars, focusing on elementary-level Japanese-speaking learners of English (JLEs). The underlying distinction of unergatives–unaccusatives is often obscured on the surface strings due to independent syntactic properties such as feature-driven subject movement (in English) or headedness (in Japanese). Nevertheless, based on previous findings, elementary-level JLEs are expected to have reset headedness but have not acquired subject movement. Then, the resulting representation would not involve the properties obscuring the underlying unergative–unaccusative distinction and potentially exhibit it on the surface strings in L2 English. Following these observations, we carefully designed test sentences with un/grammatical word orders that elementary-level JLEs would generate and conducted an acceptability judgment task with native speakers of English and elementary-/intermediate-level JLEs. The results showed that, in contrast to native controls and intermediate learners, who exhibited target-like patterns, elementary-level JLEs incorrectly accepted ungrammatical word orders only with unaccusatives (e.g., *) but not those with unergatives (e.g., *). This discrepancy can be attributed to the sensitivity to the structural distinction of unergative–unaccusative verbs, and our data provide evidence for the creative construction of an interlanguage in L2 acquisition.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24058.kim
2025-04-08
2025-04-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lab.24058.kim
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Schäfer, F.
    (2015) External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
    (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, M.
    (1988) Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, M., Johnson, K., & Roberts, I.
    (1989) Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Balcom, P.
    (1997) Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1191/026765897670080531
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897670080531 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R., Singmann, H., Dai, B., Scheipl, F., Grothendieck, G., & Green, P.
    (2020) Package ‘lme4’ (Version 1.1–26).
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bresnan, J.
    (1994) Locative inversion and the architecture of Universal Grammar. Language, (), –. 10.2307/416741
     https://doi.org/10.2307/416741 [Google Scholar]
  8. Burzio, L.
    (1986) Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑4522‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carrier, J., & Randall, J. H.
    (1992) The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chomsky, N.
    (2001) Derivation by phase. InM. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp.–). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2021) Minimalism: Where are we now, and where can we hope to go. Gengo Kenkyu, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á., & Ott, D.
    (2019) Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 2019 –. 10.5565/rev/catjl.288
     https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/catjl.288 [Google Scholar]
  13. Collins, C.
    (2005) A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2005.00076.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00076.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Epstein, S. D., Kitahara, H., & Seely, T. D.
    (2016) Phase cancellation by external pairmerge of heads. The Linguistic Review, , –. 10.1515/tlr‑2015‑0015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2015-0015 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fukui, N.
    (1995) Theory of projection in syntax. CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hawkins, R., & Hattori, H.
    (2006) Interpretation of English multiple wh-question by Japanese speakers: a missing uninterpretable feature account. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1191/0267658306sr269oa
     https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr269oa [Google Scholar]
  17. Hawkins, R., & Liszka, S.
    (2003) Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. InR. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R. Towell (Eds.), The interface between syntax and lexicon in second language acquisition (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.30.03haw
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.30.03haw [Google Scholar]
  18. Haznedar, B.
    (1997) Child second language acquisition of English: A longitudinal case study of a Turkish-speaking child [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Durham.
  19. Hirakawa, M.
    (2001) L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263101002054
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101002054 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2003) Unaccusativity in second language Japanese and English. Hituzi Syobo Publishing LTD.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. (2006) ‘Passive’ unaccusative errors in L2 English revisited. InR. Slabakova, S. A. Montrul, & P. Prevost (Eds.) Inquiries in linguistic development (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.133.03hir
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.133.03hir [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoekstra, T.
    (1988) Small clause results. Lingua, (), –. 10.1016/0024‑3841(88)90056‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(88)90056-3 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ionin, T.
    (2012) Formal theory-based methodologies. InA. Mackey, & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp.–). Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Jaeggli, O.
    (1986) Passive. Linguistic Inquiry, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Ju, M. K.
    (2000) Overpassivization errors by second language learners: The effect of conceptualizable agents in discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263100001042
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100001042 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kageyama, T.
    (1993) Bunpoo to gokeisei [Grammar and word formation]. Hitsuji Shobo.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. (1996) Dooshi imi-ron [Semantics of verbs]. Kuroshio Shuppan.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kimura, T.
    (2022a) Feature selection, feature reassembly, and the role of Universal Grammar: The acquisition of wh-questions by Japanese and Chinese learners of English. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Chuo University.
  29. (2022b) ‘Control’-ed raising: Misanalyses of infinitival clause structures by L2 learners. Journal of the Institute of Cultural Science, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. (to appear). ‘Strong’ weak-island effects in Interlanguage: Arguments from D-linking. Proceedings of BUCLD.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kimura, T., & Wakabayashi, S.
    (2024) UG–as–guide in selection and reassembly of an uninterpretable feature in L2 acquisition of wh-questions: Evidence from islands and scope. InM. Velnić, A. Dahl, & K. Listhaug (Eds.), Current perspectives on generative SLA — Representations, Processing and Development (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.70.13kim
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.70.13kim [Google Scholar]
  32. Kishimoto, H.
    (1996) Split intransitivity in Japanese and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Language, (), –. 10.2307/416651
     https://doi.org/10.2307/416651 [Google Scholar]
  33. Klein, W., & Perdue, C.
    (1997) The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1191/026765897666879396
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666879396 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kratzer, A.
    (1996) Serving the external argument from its verb. InJ. Rooryck, & L. Zarling (Eds.) Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp.–). Kluwer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kuribara, C.
    (2004) Misanalysis of subjects in Japanese–English interlanguage. Second Language, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. A., & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2017) lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lardiere, D.
    (2009) Some thoughts on a contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658308100283
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308100283 [Google Scholar]
  38. Leal, T., & Shimanskaya, E.
    (2024) The power of paradox in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.23052.lea
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.23052.lea [Google Scholar]
  39. Levin, B., & Rappaport-Hovav, M.
    (1995) Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lohndal, T., & Putnam, M.
    (2024) The importance of features and exponents. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.23023.loh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.23023.loh [Google Scholar]
  41. Meisel, J.
    (1991) Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language learning: some similarities and differences between first and second language acquisition. InL. Eubank (Ed.), Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.3.12mei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.3.12mei [Google Scholar]
  42. (1997) The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language acquisition. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1191/026765897666180760
     https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897666180760 [Google Scholar]
  43. Miyamoto, Y., & Iijima, Y.
    (2003) On the existence of scrambling in the grammar of Japanese elementary EFL learners. InS. Foster-Cohen, & S. P. Doehler (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook, (), –. John Benjamins. 10.1075/eurosla.3.04miy
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.3.04miy [Google Scholar]
  44. Myles, F.
    (2004) From data to theory: the over-representation of linguistic knowledge in SLA. Transactions of the Philological Society, (). –. 10.1111/j.0079‑1636.2004.00133.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0079-1636.2004.00133.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Nakayama, M., & Yoshimura, N.
    (2019, July5). On the intervention effects and subjects in the interpretation of raising constructions by Japanese learners of English [Conference presentation]. Tohoku University, Sendai.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Oshita, H.
    (2000) What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: A corpus study of ‘passive’ unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/026765830001600401
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765830001600401 [Google Scholar]
  47. Park, K.-S., & Lakshmanan, U.
    (2007) The unaccusative–unergative distinction in resultatives: Evidence from Korean L2 learners of English. InA. Belikova, L. Meroni, & Umeda, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of GALANA (pp.–). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Perlmutter, D.
    (1978) Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, –. 10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198 [Google Scholar]
  49. Progovac, L.
    (2015) The absolutive basis of middles and the status of vP and UTAH. FASL, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B.
    (2001) An event structure account of English resultatives. Language, , –. 10.1353/lan.2001.0221
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0221 [Google Scholar]
  51. Saito, M.
    (2003) A derivational approach to the interpretation of scrambling chains. Lingua, , –. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(02)00083‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00083-9 [Google Scholar]
  52. Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
    (1996) L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/026765839601200103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200103 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sprouse, J.
    (2011) A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/s13428‑010‑0039‑7
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0039-7 [Google Scholar]
  54. Tsimpli, I. M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M.
    (2007) The Interpretability Hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658307076546
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307076546 [Google Scholar]
  55. University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate
    University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (2001) Quick Placement Test. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wakabayashi, S., & Negishi, R.
    (2003) Asymmetry of subjects and objects in Japanese speakers’ L2 English. Second Language, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Wechsler, S.
    (1997) Resultative predicates and control. InR. C. Blight, & M. J. Moosally (Eds.), Proceedings of the Texas Linguistic Forum (pp.–), Department of Linguistics, University of Texas, Austin.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. White, L.
    (2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815065
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065 [Google Scholar]
  59. Yatsushiro, K.
    (1999) Case licensing and VP structure. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Connecticut.
  60. Yusa, N.
    (2003) ‘Passive’ unaccusatives in L2 acquisition. InP. Clancy (Ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics (pp.–). CLSI.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Zobl, H.
    (1989) Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. InS. Gass, & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524544.015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524544.015 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24058.kim
Loading
More evidence on the unergative–unaccusative distinction in second language grammars
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24058.kim
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24058.kim
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24058.kim
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: interlanguage ; unaccusative ; unaccusativity ; unergative ; argument structure

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error