1887
image of Age of onset does not matter for bilingual children’s understanding of late-acquired
phenomena

Abstract

Abstract

The Timing Hypothesis predicts that age of onset and L2 input in bilingual acquisition interact with timing in monolingual acquisition: early-acquired phenomena, mastered before age four by monolingual children, are subject to age of onset effects, whereas late-acquired phenomena, mastered after age four by monolinguals, are not affected by age of onset but by L2 input. The current study evaluates the prediction regarding late-acquired phenomena in the area of sentential semantics by examining how bilingual children understand sentences with temporal connectives in their L2 as a function of age of onset and length of L2 exposure. A group of six- to twelve-year-old children with L1 Greek and L2 German, varying widely in age of onset and length of L2 exposure, was tested on their comprehension of sentences with the connectives and in iconic and non-iconic order, using a picture-sequence selection task. Baseline data from monolingual German-speaking children showed that temporal connectives are a late-acquired phenomenon, still not mastered by age seven. Bilingual children’s L2 performance was not influenced by age of onset, despite its wide range, but by length of L2 exposure. This finding provides novel support for the Timing Hypothesis from temporal semantics.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24096.mak
2025-08-05
2026-03-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/lab.24096.mak/lab.24096.mak.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24096.mak&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K.
    (1999) Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. InD. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp.–). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Birdsong, D.
    (2018) Plasticity, variability and age in second language acquisition and bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology, : . 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00081
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00081 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blything, L. P., & Cain, K.
    (2016) Children’s processing and comprehension of complex sentences containing temporal connectives: The influence of memory on the time course of accurate responses. Developmental Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/dev0000201
    https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000201 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blything, L. P., Davies, R., & Cain, K.
    (2015) Young children’s comprehension of temporal relations in complex sentences: The influence of memory on performance. Child Development, (), –. 10.1111/cdev.12412
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12412 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chondrogianni, V.
    (2018) Child L2 acquisition. InD. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman, & L. Serratrice (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.54.06cho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.54.06cho [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark, E. V.
    (1971) On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, , –. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(71)80054‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80054-3 [Google Scholar]
  8. De Ruiter, L. E., Lemen, H. C. P., Lieven, E. V. M., Brandt, S., & Theakston, A. L.
    (2021) Structural and interactional aspects of adverbial sentences in English mother-child interactions: An analysis of two dense corpora. Journal of Child Language, (), –. 10.1017/S0305000920000641
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000641 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Ruiter, L. E., Lieven, E. V. M., Brandt, S., & Theakston, A. L.
    (2020) Interactions between givenness and clause order in children’s processing of complex sentences. Cognition, : . 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104130
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104130 [Google Scholar]
  10. De Ruiter, L. E., Theakston, A. L., Brandt, S., & Lieven, E. V. M.
    (2018a) Iconicity affects children’s comprehension of complex sentences: The role of semantics, clause order, input and individual differences. Cognition, , –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  11. De Ruiter, L. E., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Hilton, M., & Brandt, S.
    (2018b, November2–4). Is before easier than after in German, too? Testing the relative influence of iconicity, ambiguity, and language-specific frequencies on the processing of adverbial sentences in German [Conference Presentation]. BUCLD 43, Boston, MA, United States.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Diessel, H.
    (2004) The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486531
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486531 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dryer, M. S.
    (2013) Order of adverbial subordinator and clause. InM. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. URL: wals.info/chapter/94
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hamann, C., & Abed Ibrahim, L.
    (2017) Methods for identifying specific language impairment in bilingual populations in Germany. Frontiers in Communication, : . 10.3389/fcomm.2017.00016
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2017.00016 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamann, C., Chilla, S., Ruigendijk, E., & Abed Ibrahim, L.
    (2013, May27–29). A German sentence repetition task: Testing bilingual Russian/German children [Conference presentation]. COST meeting, Krakow, Poland.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hasselhorn, M., Schumann-Hengsteler, R., Gronauer, J., Grube, D., Mähler, C., Schmid, I., Seitz-Stein, K., & Zoelch, C.
    (2012) AGTB 5–12: Arbeitsgedächtnistestbatterie für Kinder von 5 bis 12 Jahren. Manual. Hogrefe.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Karlsson, J., Jolles, D., Koornneef, A., van den Broek, P., & van Leijenhorst, L.
    (2019) Individual differences in children’s comprehension of temporal relations: Dissociable contributions of working memory capacity and working memory updating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, , –. 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.04.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kroffke, S., & Rothweiler, M.
    (2006) Variation im frühen Zweitspracherwerb des Deutschen durch Kinder mit türkischer Erstsprache. InM. Vliegen (Ed.), Variation in Sprachtheorie und Spracherwerb: Akten des 39. Linguistischen Kolloquiums in Amsterdam 2004 (pp.–). Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lenth, R. V., Buerkner, P., Herve, M., Love, J., Miguez, F., Riebl, H., & Singmann, H.
    (2021) Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least-Squares Means. R Package Version 1.5.4. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Makrodimitris, C.
    (2025) Bilingual children’s comprehension of temporal connectives: The role of age of onset (Doctoral Dissertation). Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany. 10.21248/gups.91101
    https://doi.org/10.21248/gups.91101
  21. Makrodimitris, C., & Schulz, P.
    (2025) Comprehension of complex sentences containing temporal connectives: How children are led down the event-semantic kindergarten-path. Journal of Child Language, (), –. 10.1017/S0305000924000205
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000924000205 [Google Scholar]
  22. Meir, N., Walters, J., & Armon-Lotem, S.
    (2017) Bi-directional cross-linguistic influence in bilingual Russian-Hebrew children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.15007.mei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15007.mei [Google Scholar]
  23. Meisel, J. M.
    (2013) Sensitive phases in successive language acquisition: The critical period hypothesis revisited. InC. Boeckx, & K. K. Grohmann (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511980435.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435.007 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2018) Early child second language acquisition: French gender in German children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728916000237
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000237 [Google Scholar]
  25. Overweg, J., Hartman, C. A., & Hendriks, P.
    (2018) Temporarily out of order: Temporal perspective taking in language in children with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, : . 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01663
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01663 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pontikas, G., Cunnings, I., & Marinis, T.
    (2024) Sentence processing in bilingual children: Evidence from garden-path sentences. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.22104.pon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22104.pon [Google Scholar]
  27. Pyykkönen, P., & Järvikivi, J.
    (2012) Children and situation models of multiple events. Developmental Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/a0025526
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025526 [Google Scholar]
  28. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rett, J.
    (2020) Eliminating EARLIEST: A general semantics for before and after. InM. Franke, N. Kompa, M. Liu, J. L. Mueller, & J. Schwab (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 24 (Vol., pp.–). Osnabrück University. https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mZhNDA4Y/SuB24-twovolume.pdf
  30. Roesch, A. D., & Chondrogianni, V.
    (2016) “Which mouse kissed the frog?”: Effects of age of onset, length of exposure, and knowledge of case marking on the comprehension of wh-questions in German-speaking simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, (), –. 10.1017/S0305000916000015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000015 [Google Scholar]
  31. Rothman, J., Long, D., Iverson, M., Judy, T., Lingwall, A., & Chakravarty, T.
    (2016) Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: Evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives. Journal of Child Language, (), –. 10.1017/S0305000915000549
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000549 [Google Scholar]
  32. Schulz, P.
    (2024) What object relatives and temporal connectives have in common: notes on two late acquired phenomena and the causes of lateness. InA. Sevcenco, I. Stoica, I. Stoicescu, M. Tănase-Dogaru, A. Tigău, & V. Tomescu (Eds.), Exploring linguistic landscapes: A Festschrift for Larisa Avram & Andrei Avram (pp.–). Bucharest University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Schulz, P., & Grimm, A.
    (2019) The age factor revisited: Timing in acquisition interacts with age of onset in bilingual acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, : . 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02732
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02732 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schulz, P., & Tracy, R.
    (2011) LiSe–DaZ: Linguistische Sprachstandserhebung — Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Hogrefe.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sopata, A.
    (2011) Placement of infinitives in successive child language acquisition. InE. Rinke & T. Kupisch (Eds.), The development of grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change. In honour of Jürgen M. Meisel (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hsm.11.06sop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.11.06sop [Google Scholar]
  36. Stephany, U.
    (1997) The acquisition of Greek. InD. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol., pp.–). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Trosborg, A.
    (1982) Children’s comprehension of ‘before’ and ‘after’ reinvestigated. Journal of Child Language, (), –. 10.1017/S0305000900004773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900004773 [Google Scholar]
  38. Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L.
    (1999) The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, (), –. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00032‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3 [Google Scholar]
  39. Tsimpli, I. M.
    (2014) Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.4.3.01tsi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.3.01tsi [Google Scholar]
  40. Tuller, L.
    (2015) Clinical use of parental questionnaires in multilingual contexts. InS. Armon-Lotem, J. d. Jong, & N. Meir (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp.–). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Unsworth, S.
    (2013) Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728912000284
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000284 [Google Scholar]
  42. Unsworth, S., Argyri, F., Cornips, L., Hulk, A., Sorace, A., & Tsimpli, I.
    (2014) The role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716412000574
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000574 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24096.mak
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.24096.mak
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: age of onset ; timing hypothesis ; late-acquired ; bilingual children ; temporal connectives
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error