1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
  4. Volume 16, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Brazilian Portuguese (BP) and Japanese have phonological repair strategies that involve vowel epenthesis in illicit consonant clusters, but whereas BP inserts /i/, Japanese inserts /ɯ/ as a default. For example, a loanword like ‘TikTok’ is typically produced as /ti.ki.tɔ.ki/ in BP and as /tik.kɯ.tok.kɯ/in Japanese. Here, we ask whether balanced BP–Japanese bilinguals apply their language-specific repair strategies separately, or whether one language’s strategy ‘spills over’ into the other, and if such spillover occurs, which individual factors predict its likelihood.

Twenty-two BP–Japanese bilinguals participated in a production task in which they were presented with stimuli containing illicit consonant clusters, e.g., /agbo/, and produced these forms within a BP or Japanese carrier sentence. A model predicting the likelihood of epenthesis type revealed that speakers mostly applied language-specific strategies separately, i.e., /i/-epenthesis in the BP sentences and /ɯ/-epenthesis in the Japanese sentences. However, in some cases, we observed ‘spillover’, e.g., /i/-epenthesis in Japanese or /ɯ/-epenthesis in BP. Individual variation in language dominance, aggregate immersion, and phonolexical perception acuity predicted the likelihood of such spillover. These findings contribute new production data to a growing body of literature on individual variation in bilinguals’ language-specific phonotactics.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.25006.lam
2025-07-14
2026-09-05

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lab.25006.lam
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lab.25006.lam.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/lab.25006.lam&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alcorn, S. M.
    (2018) The role of L2 experience in L1 phonotactic restructuring in sequential bilinguals [The University of Texas at Austin; Application/pdf]. 10.26153/tsw/12034
     https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/12034 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N. Z., & Evershed, J. K.
    (2020) Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioural experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 521, 388–407. 10.3758/s13428‑019‑01237‑x
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x [Google Scholar]
  3. Arel-Bundock, V., Greifer, N., & Heiss, A.
    (2024) How to interpret statistical models using marginal effects for R and Python. Journal of Statistical Software, 111(9). 10.18637/jss.v111.i09
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v111.i09 [Google Scholar]
  4. Azevedo, R. Q., Matzenauer, C. L. B., & Alves, U. K.
    (2017) Formalização fonético-fonológica da interação de restrições na percepção da epêntese vocálica no português brasileiro. ReVEL, 15(18).
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Best, C. T.
    (1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. Speech perception and linguistic experience. Issues in cross-language research, 167–200. 10.1016/0378‑4266(91)90103‑S
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(91)90103-S [Google Scholar]
  6. Birdsong, D., Gertken, L. D., & Amengual, M.
    (2012) Bilingual Language Profile: An Easy-to-Use Instrument to Assess Bilingualism. COERLL, University of Texas, https://blp.coerll.utexas.edu
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2019) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Software]. www.praat.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown-Bousfield, M. M., & Chang, C. B.
    (2023) Regressive cross-linguistic influence in multilingual speech rhythm: The role of language similarity. InM. M. Brown, S. Flynn, & É. Fernández-Berkes (Eds.), Studies in Bilingualism (Vol.651, pp.49–71). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sibil.65.03bro
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.65.03bro [Google Scholar]
  9. Bürkner, P.-C.
    (2018) Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal, 10(1). 10.32614/RJ‑2018‑017
     https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cabrelli, J., Luque, A., & Finestrat-Martínez, I.
    (2019) Influence of L2 English phonotactics in L1 Brazilian Portuguese illusory vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics, 731, 55–69. 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.10.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cabrelli, J., & Pichan, C.
    (2021) Initial phonological transfer in L3 Brazilian Portuguese and Italian. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(2), 131–167. 10.1075/lab.18048.cab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18048.cab [Google Scholar]
  12. Castle, C., Skałba, A., & Westergaard, M.
    (2025) Cross-linguistic influence in L3 acquisition: Investigating the roles of dominance, recency, and property. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. Online first. 10.1075/lab.24022.cas
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24022.cas [Google Scholar]
  13. Chodroff, E.
    (2018) Corpus Phonetics Tutorial (No. arXiv:1811.05553). arXiv. arxiv.org/abs/1811.05553
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Davidson, L.
    (2006) Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 34(1), 104–137. 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.03.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2010) Phonetic bases of similarities in cross-language production: Evidence from English and Catalan. Journal of Phonetics, 38(2), 272–288. 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  16. De Bruin, A., & Xu, T.
    (2023) Language switching in different contexts and modalities: Response–stimulus interval influences cued-naming but not voluntary-naming or comprehension language-switching costs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26(2), 402–415. 10.1017/S1366728922000554
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000554 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Leeuw, E., Stockall, L., Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., & Gorba Masip, C.
    (2021) Illusory vowels in Spanish–English sequential bilinguals: Evidence that accurate L2 perception is neither necessary nor sufficient for accurate L2 production. Second Language Research, 37(4), 587–618. 10.1177/0267658319886623
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319886623 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J.
    (1999) Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1568–1578. 10.1037/0096‑1523.25.6.1568
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1568 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dupoux, E., Parlato, E., Frota, S., Hirose, Y., & Peperkamp, S.
    (2011) Where do illusory vowels come from?Journal of Memory and Language, 64(3), 199–210. 10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  20. Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S.
    (2021) The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). InR. Wayland (Ed.), Second Language Speech Learning (pp.3–83). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108886901.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002 [Google Scholar]
  21. Garcia, D. L., & Gollan, T. H.
    (2022) The MINT Sprint: Exploring a fast administration procedure with an expanded multilingual naming test. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 28(8), 845–861. 10.1017/S1355617721001004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617721001004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Guevara-Rukoz, A., Lin, I., Morii, M., Minagawa, Y., Dupoux, E., & Peperkamp, S.
    (2017) Which epenthetic vowel? Phonetic categories versus acoustic detail in perceptual vowel epenthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), EL211–EL217. 10.1121/1.4998138
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4998138 [Google Scholar]
  23. Guevara-Rukoz, A., Parlato-Oliveira, E., Yu, S., Hirose, Y., Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E.
    (2017) Predicting epenthetic vowel quality from acoustics. Proceedings of Interspeech20171, 596–600. 10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑1735
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1735 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hasegawa, Y.
    (Ed.) (2018) The Cambridge Handbook of Japanese Linguistics (1st dr.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316884461
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316884461 [Google Scholar]
  25. John, P., & Cardoso, W.
    (2017) On syllable structure and phonological variation: The case of i-epenthesis by Brazilian Portuguese learners of English. Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 70(3), 169–184. 10.5007/2175‑8026.2017v70n3p169
     https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2017v70n3p169 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, K., & Kochetov, A.
    (2011) Phonology and phonetics of epenthetic vowels in loanwords: Experimental evidence from Korean. Lingua, 121(3), 511–532. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.012
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.012 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim, S. Y., & Han, J.-I.
    (2024) The relationship between perception and production of illusory vowels in a second language. Second Language Research, 40(2), 271–300. 10.1177/02676583221135185
     https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221135185 [Google Scholar]
  28. Klein-Braley, C.
    (1985) A cloze-up on the C-Test: A study in the construct validation of authentic tests. Language Testing, 2(1), 76–104. 10.1177/026553228500200108
     https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228500200108 [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, P., Zhang, F., Yu, A., & Zhao, X.
    (2020) Language History Questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(5), 938–944. 10.1017/S1366728918001153
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001153 [Google Scholar]
  30. Llompart, M.
    (2021) Lexical and phonetic influences on the phonolexical encoding of difficult second-language contrasts: Insights from nonword rejection. Frontiers in Psychology, 121, 659852. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659852
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659852 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., & Makowski, D.
    (2021) Performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3139. 10.21105/joss.03139
     https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139 [Google Scholar]
  32. MacWhinney, B.
    (2018) A unified model of first and second language learning. InM. Hickmann, E. Veneziani, & H. Jisa (Eds.), Sources of variation in first language acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners (pp.287–312). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.22.15mac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.15mac [Google Scholar]
  33. Martínez Vera, G., López Otero, J. C., Sokolova, M. Y., Cleveland, A., Marshall, M. T., & Sánchez, L.
    (2023) Aspectual se and telicity in heritage Spanish bilinguals: The effects of lexical access, dominance, age of acquisition, and patterns of language use. Languages, 8(3), 201. 10.3390/languages8030201
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030201 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mas-Herrero, E., Adrover-Roig, D., Ruz, M., & De Diego-Balaguer, R.
    (2021) Do bilinguals outperform monolinguals in switching tasks? Contrary evidence for nonlinguistic and linguistic switching tasks. Neurobiology of Language, 2(4), 586–604. 10.1162/nol_a_00059
     https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00059 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mattingley, W., Currie Hall, K., & Hume, E.
    (2019) Epenthetic vowel production of unfamiliar medial consonant clusters by Japanese speakers. Laboratory Phonology, 10(1), 1–35. 10.5334/labphon.158
     https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.158 [Google Scholar]
  36. McAuliffe, M., Socolof, M., Mihuc, S., Wagner, M., & Sonderegger, M.
    (2017) Montreal Forced Aligner: Trainable text–speech alignment using Kaldi. Interspeech20171, 498–502. 10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑1386
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1386 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nicenboim, B., Vasishth, S., Engelmann, F., & Suckow, K.
    (2018) Exploratory and confirmatory analyses in sentence processing: A case study of number interference in German. Cognitive Science, 421, 1075–1100. 10.1111/cogs.12589
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12589 [Google Scholar]
  38. Parlato-Oliveira, E., Christophe, A., Hirose, Y., & Dupoux, E.
    (2010) Plasticity of illusory vowel perception in Brazilian–Japanese bilinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(6), 3738–3748. 10.1121/1.3327792
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3327792 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pelzl, E., Lau, E. F., Guo, T., & Dekeyser, R. M.
    (2021) Advanced second language learners of Mandarin show persistent deficits for lexical tone encoding in picture-to-word form matching. Frontiers in Communication, 61. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.689423
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.689423 [Google Scholar]
  40. Puggaard-Rode, R.
    (2024) praatpicture. A library for making flexible Praat Picture-style figures in R. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Speech Production, 131, 145–148. 10.21437/issp.2024‑34
     https://doi.org/10.21437/issp.2024-34 [Google Scholar]
  41. Shaw, J. A., & Davidson, L.
    (2011) Perceptual similarity in input–output mappings: A computational/experimental study of non-native speech production. Lingua, 121(8), 1344–1358. 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.03.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  42. Shin, D.-J., & Iverson, P.
    (2010) Individual differences in vowel epenthesis among Korean learners of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4_Supplement), 2488–2488. 10.1121/1.3508938
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3508938 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2014) Phonetic investigation of epenthetic vowels produced by Korean learners of English. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 6(4), 17–26. 10.13064/KSSS.2014.6.4.017
     https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2014.6.4.017 [Google Scholar]
  44. Shoji, S., & Shoji, K.
    (2014) Vowel epenthesis and consonant deletion in Japanese loanwords from English. Proceedings of the Annual Meetings on Phonology, 1(1). 10.3765/amp.v1i1.16
     https://doi.org/10.3765/amp.v1i1.16 [Google Scholar]
  45. Steinkrauss, R., & Schmid, M. S.
    (2017) Entrenchment and language attrition. InH.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. (pp.367–383). American Psychological Association. 10.1037/15969‑017
     https://doi.org/10.1037/15969-017 [Google Scholar]
  46. Uffmann, C.
    (2007) Vowel Epenthesis in Loanword Adaptation. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110934823
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110934823 [Google Scholar]
  47. Vendelin, I., & Peperkamp, S.
    (2006) The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations. Lingua, 116(7), 996–1007. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.07.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Veríssimo, J.
    (2025) A gentle introduction to Bayesian statistics, with applications to bilingualism research. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.24027.ver
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24027.ver [Google Scholar]
  49. Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A. H., Friis-Olivarius, M., Vuust, C., & Vuust, P.
    (2010) The Musical Ear Test, a new reliable test for measuring musical competence. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 188–196. 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wayland, R., Landfair, D., Li, B., & Guion, S. G.
    (2006) Native Thai Speakers’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(3), 285–304. 10.1007/s10936‑006‑9016‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9016-9 [Google Scholar]
  51. Wigdorowitz, M., Pérez, A. I., & Tsimpli, I. M.
    (2023) A holistic measure of contextual and individual linguistic diversity. International Journal of Multilingualism, 20(2), 469–487. 10.1080/14790718.2020.1835921
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1835921 [Google Scholar]
  52. Woods, K. J. P., Siegel, M. H., Traer, J., & McDermott, J. H.
    (2017) Headphone screening to facilitate web-based auditory experiments. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(7). 10.3758/s13414‑017‑1361‑2
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1361-2 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.25006.lam
Loading
Individual variation in epenthetic vowel production by Brazilian Portuguese–Japanese bilinguals
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 16, 203 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25006.lam
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.25006.lam
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.25006.lam
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Brazilian Portuguese; epenthesis; individual variation; Japanese; production

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error