1887
image of Learning contexts and conversational implicatures in English determiners
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Cho (2022) investigated the computation of conversational implicatures (CIs) in two English determiners, and . Although both can be used to indicate uniqueness, only carries an implication of contrast, which distinguishes between two nouns from the same category. It was found that L1-Korean L2-English speakers did not compute this implication due to functional overlap between the English determiners and the Korean demonstrative ‘that.’ Replicating Cho (2022), the present study examined the role of learning contexts in the computation of the implication of contrast by L1-Thai EFL (English as a Foreign Language) and ESL (English as a Second Language) speakers. Since CIs lie at the semantics–pragmatics interface and positive effects of naturalistic exposure in pragmatic development have been reported, L1-Thai ESL learners were predicted to benefit from naturalistic exposure L2 English, overriding L1 transfer, and to show sensitivity to the implication. EFL learners, by contrast, would show non-targetlike performance due to L1 transfer. Results from an acceptability judgment task revealed that, unlike L1-English speakers, both L1-Thai EFL and ESL learners did not compute the implication of contrast, corroborating the original study and revealing no significant effect of naturalistic exposure on the computation of CIs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.25048.cha
2025-12-11
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahn, D.
    (2017) Definite and demonstrative descriptions: A micro-typology. InM. Yoshitaka Erlewine (Ed.), Proceedings of Generative Linguistics in the Old World (GLOW) in Asia 2017, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M. T.
    (2011) Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1515/iprg.2011.017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.017 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z.
    (1998) Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3587583
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bella, S.
    (2011) Mitigation and politeness in Greek invitation refusals: Effects of length of residence in the target community and intensity of interaction on non-native speakers’ performance. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouton, L. F.
    (1992) The interpretation of implicature in English by NNS: Does it come automatically — without being explicitly taught?Pragmatics and Language Learning, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cho, H.
    (1999) Interpretation and function of the Korean demonstrative ku. Studies in Modern Grammar, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cho, J.
    (2022) Crosslinguistic influence on L2 implicature computation for determiners. Journal of Second Language Studies, (), –. 10.1075/jsls.20004.cho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.20004.cho [Google Scholar]
  8. (2024) Scalar implicatures in adult L2 learners: A self-paced reading study. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/02676583221134058
    https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221134058 [Google Scholar]
  9. Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2022) Ordinal: Regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2022, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Destruel, E., & Starr, G.
    (2025) Scalar diversity in L2 French speakers: Pragmatic inferences in adjective scales. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.24020.des
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24020.des [Google Scholar]
  11. Feng, S.
    (2024) L2 tolerance of pragmatic violations of informativeness: Evidence from ad hoc implicatures and contrastive inference. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.21064.fen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21064.fen [Google Scholar]
  12. Flege, J. E., & Liu, S.
    (2001) The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263101004041
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101004041 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hawkins, J. A.
    (1991) On (in)definite articles: Implications and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0022226700012731
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012731 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ionin, T., Baek, S., Kim, E., Ko, H., & Wexler, K.
    (2012) That’s not so different from the: Definite and demonstrative descriptions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658311432200
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658311432200 [Google Scholar]
  15. Isabelli, C. A.
    (2004) The acquisition of the null subject parameter properties in SLA: Some effects of positive evidence in a naturalistic learning context. Hispania, (), –. 10.2307/20063017
    https://doi.org/10.2307/20063017 [Google Scholar]
  16. Iwasaki, S., & Dechapratumwan, P.
    (2022) Creating versatility in Thai demonstratives. Studies in Language, (), –. 10.1075/sl.20083.iwa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20083.iwa [Google Scholar]
  17. Iwasaki, S., & Ingkaphirom, P.
    (2005) A Reference Grammar of Thai. CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jenks, P.
    (2015) Two kinds of definite in numeral classifier languages. InS. D’Antonio, M. Moroney & C. R. Little (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT (pp.–). Linguistic Society of America Archive. 10.3765/salt.v25i0.3057
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v25i0.3057 [Google Scholar]
  19. Matsumura, S.
    (2001) Learning the rules for offering advice: A quantitative approach to second language socialization. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00170
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00170 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mazzaggio, G., Panizza, D., & Surian, L.
    (2021) On the interpretation of scalar implicatures in first and second language. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Miller, D., Giancaspro, D., Iverson, M., Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R.
    (2016) Not just algunos, but indeed unos L2ers can acquire scalar implicatures in L2 Spanish. InA. De la Fuente, E. Valenzuela, & C. Martínez Same (Eds.), Language Acquisition Beyond Parameters. Studies in Honor of Juana M. Liceras (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.51.06mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.51.06mil [Google Scholar]
  22. Pliatsikas, C., & Marinis, T.
    (2013) Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S136672891200017X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891200017X [Google Scholar]
  23. Roberts, C.
    (2002) Demonstratives as definites. InK. van Deemter & R. Kibble (Eds.), Information Sharing: Reference and Presupposition in Language Generation and Interpretation (pp.–). CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schauer, G. A.
    (2006) Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2006.00348.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2006.00348.x [Google Scholar]
  25. Slabakova, R.
    (2010) Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua, (), –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  26. Snape, N., & Hosoi, H.
    (2018) Acquisition of scalar implicatures: Evidence from adult Japanese L2 learners of English. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.18010.sna
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18010.sna [Google Scholar]
  27. Sorace, A.
    (2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor [Google Scholar]
  28. Taguchi, N.
    (2008) The role of learning environment in the development of pragmatic comprehension: A comparison of gains between EFL and ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263108080716
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080716 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2011) The effect of L2 proficiency and study-abroad experience on pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00633.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00633.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Trenkic, D., & Pongpairoj, N.
    (2013) Referent salience affects second language article use. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728912000156
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000156 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.25048.cha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.25048.cha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error