What returnee bilinguals continue to teach us

References

1. Broesma, M.
   (2025) What returnee international adoptees may teach us about language attrition, language stabilization, and individual variation. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25104.bro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25104.bro [Google Scholar]
2. Coşkun Kunduz, A.
   (2025) The other side of the coin matters too: What changes in the former heritage language in returnees may reveal about the dynamics of bilingual language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25065.cos
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25065.cos [Google Scholar]
3. Deluca, V., Miller, D., Pliatsikas, C., & Rothman, J.
   (2019) Brain adaptations and neurological indices of processing in adult Second Language Acquisition: Challenges for the Critical Period Hypothesis. InJ. Schwieter (Ed.), The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism (pp.170–196). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119387725.ch8
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119387725.ch8 [Google Scholar]
4. Flores, C., & Snape, N.
   (2025) What returnee bilinguals may teach us about language attrition, language stabilization, and individual variation. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25021.flo
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25021.flo [Google Scholar]
5. Hansen, L.
   (Ed.) (2012) Second Language Acquisition Abroad: The LDS Missionary Experience. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sibil.45
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.45 [Google Scholar]
6. Köpke, B.
   (2025) About the complexity of the study of complex realities. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25077.kop
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25077.kop [Google Scholar]
7. Kubota, M.
   (2025) Problematizing the notion of “stabilization”: From description to prediction in returnee research. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25066.kub
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25066.kub [Google Scholar]
8. Laméris, T. J.
   (2025) Who qualifies as ‘returnee’, and can one be truly cut off from a former societal language upon return?Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25072.lam
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25072.lam [Google Scholar]
9. Pleshak, P. & Polinsky, M.
   (2025) What can only returnees teach us about language?Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25097.ple
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25097.ple [Google Scholar]
10. Putnam, M. & Natvig, D.
    (2025) An Introduction to Language Attrition: Linguistic, Social, and Cognitive Perspectives. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003174424
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003174424 [Google Scholar]
11. Rinke, E. & Sopata, A.
    (2025) The other side of the coin: Linguistic complexity as a potential cause for selective reinforcement in the heritage language of returnee speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25068.rin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25068.rin [Google Scholar]
12. Rebuschat, P. & Rothman, J.
    (2025) Age effects in “returnee” bilingualism: Problematizing their conflation as prima facie evidence for linguistic maturation. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25098.rot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25098.rot [Google Scholar]
13. Sánchez, L.
    (2019) Bilingual alignments. Languages, 4(4), 82. 10.3390/languages4040082
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages4040082 [Google Scholar]
14. Sánchez, L. & Putnam, M.
    (2025) A dynamic model of fluctuation and re-stabilization. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25090.san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25090.san [Google Scholar]
15. Schmitt, E.
    (2025) Turning to returnees: Differential development or attrition?Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25070.sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25070.sch [Google Scholar]
16. Taura, H.
    (2019) Attrition studies on Japanese returnees. InM. S. Schmid & B. Köpke (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Attrition (pp.391–402). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Taura, H.
    (2025) Emergentism meets attrition: Returnee children as a lens on lifespan language dynamics. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25069.tau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25069.tau [Google Scholar]
18. Tomić, A., Rodina, Y., Bayram, F., & De Cat, C.
    (2025) Individual language experience determinants of morphosyntactic variation in heritage and attriting speakers of Bosnian and Serbian: A causal inference approach. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 15(6), 776–811. 10.1075/lab.24016.tom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24016.tom [Google Scholar]
19. Treffers-Daller, J. & Alraddadi, H.
    (2025) Continuities and discontinuities in L2 exposure among returnees: How plausible is a clean break with English or German after return?Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25081.tre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25081.tre [Google Scholar]
20. Yang, C.
    (2004) Universal grammar, statistics, or both?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 81, 451–456. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.006 [Google Scholar]
21. Zúñiga, V.
    (2025) International migration and linguistic vicissitudes. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. 10.1075/lab.25071.zun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.25071.zun [Google Scholar]