1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Sentence predictability and lexical factors during L2 reading
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Theoretical accounts of second language (L2) reading differ in whether sentence context compensates for inefficiencies in L2 lexical processing (Compensatory Processing Hypothesis) or is constrained by them (Lexical Bottleneck Hypothesis). This eye-tracking study tested these competing predictions in 80 Chinese learners of English by examining how contextual predictability interacts with word frequency and orthographic neighbourhood size, and whether these effects are modulated by L2 proficiency. Results showed additive effects of frequency and predictability in early processing measures (first fixation duration and gaze duration). In contrast, total fixation duration and skipping rates revealed significant interactions such that contextual facilitation was strongest for high-frequency words. This pattern challenges the compensatory view and instead suggests that efficient lexical retrieval is a prerequisite for effective context integration. Proficiency also modulated the effect of neighbourhood size in first fixation duration and the interaction between neighbourhood size and predictability in total fixation duration, indicating that the use of lexical and contextual information differs across proficiency levels. Overall, the findings support a lexical bottleneck account of L2 reading, whereby lexical quality shapes both the time course and the effectiveness of context use.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.26019.liu
2026-06-23
2026-07-17

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/lab.26019.liu
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altmann, G. T. M., & Mirkovic, J.
    (2009) Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science, (), –. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2009.01022.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01022.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, S.
    (1989) Frequency and neighbourhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R.
    (2007) The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/BF03193014
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brysbaert, M., Buchmeier, M., Conrad, M., Jacobs, A. M., Bölte, J., & Böhl, A.
    (2011) The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1027/1618‑3169/a000123
     https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000123 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brysbaert, M., Lagrou, E., & Stevens, M.
    (2017) Visual word recognition in a second language: A test of the lexical entrenchment hypothesis with lexical decision times. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728916000353
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000353 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cathoven, A. I.
    (2026) CEFR Checker (Version 2.0) [Web app]. Cathoven Language Hub. https://nexthub.cathoven.com/
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D.
    (1977) Access to the internal lexicon. InS. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp.–). Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooley, F. G., Emmorey, K., Saunders, E., Sinclair, G., Stringer, C., & Schotter, E. R.
    (2025) Identifying text-based factors that contribute to the superior reading efficiency of skilled deaf readers: An eye-tracking study of length, frequency, and predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cop, U., Keuleers, E., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W.
    (2015) Frequency effects in monolingual and bilingual natural reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/s13423‑015‑0819‑2
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0819-2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2020) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment — Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cunnings, I.
    (2026) Group level and individual differences in second language sentence processing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.24093.cun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24093.cun [Google Scholar]
  13. DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M.
    (2005) Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1038/nn1504
     https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1504 [Google Scholar]
  14. Diependaele, K., Lemhöfer, K., & Brysbaert, M.
    (2013) The word frequency effect in first- and second-language word recognition: A lexical entrenchment account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/17470218.2012.720994
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.720994 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dijkgraaf, A., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Duyck, W.
    (2017) Predicting upcoming information in native-language and nonnative-language auditory word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728916000547
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916000547 [Google Scholar]
  16. Duyck, W., Vanderelst, D., Desmet, T., & Hartsuiker, R. J.
    (2008) The frequency effect in second-language visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/PBR.15.4.850
     https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.4.850 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K.
    (1981) Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, (), –. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(81)90220‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90220-6 [Google Scholar]
  18. Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A.
    (2014) Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K.
    (2011) Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, (), –. 10.1037/a0022256
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022256 [Google Scholar]
  20. Grüter, T., Rohde, H., & Schafer, A.
    (2017) Coreference and discourse coherence in L2: The roles of grammatical aspect and referential form. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.15011.gru
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15011.gru [Google Scholar]
  21. He, S., Divjak, D., & Milin, P.
    (2025) Optimising participant grouping methods in bilingualism studies. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.24019.he
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.24019.he [Google Scholar]
  22. Hofmann, M. J., Remus, S., Biemann, C., Radach, R., & Kuchinke, L.
    (2022) Language models explain word reading times better than empirical predictability. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, , Article 730570. 10.3389/frai.2021.730570
     https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.730570 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hopp, H.
    (2016) Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658315624960
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315624960 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2018) The bilingual mental lexicon in L2 sentence processing. Second Language Research, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. (2022) Second language sentence processing. Annual Review of Linguistics, , –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑030821‑054113
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030821-054113 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hwang, H., & Kim, K.
    (2025) Effects of lexical frequency in predictive processing: Higher frequency boosts first language speed and facilitates second language prediction. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12718
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12718 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kaan, E.
    (2014) Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different?Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.4.2.05kaa
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.2.05kaa [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
    (2017) lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lenth, R. V.
    (2021) emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-square means (Version 1.6.3) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, M. F., Lin, W. C., Chou, T. L., Yang, F. L., & Wu, J. T.
    (2015) The role of orthographic neighborhood size effects in Chinese word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, (), –. 10.1007/s10936‑014‑9340‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9340-4 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lund, K., & Burgess, C.
    (1996) Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, (), –. 10.3758/BF03204766
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204766 [Google Scholar]
  32. Michaelov, J. A., Coulson, S., & Bergen, B. K.
    (2023) So cloze yet so far: N400 amplitude is better predicted by distributional information than human predictability judgements. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Mor, B., & Prior, A.
    (2020) Individual differences in L2 frequency effects in different-script bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1177/1367006919876356
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006919876356 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2022) Frequency and predictability effects in first and second language of different script bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mulder, K., van Heuven, W. J. B., & Dijkstra, T.
    (2018) Revisiting the neighborhood: How L2 proficiency and neighborhood manipulation affect bilingual processing. Frontiers in Psychology, , Article 1860. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01860
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01860 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nahatame, S., & Uchida, S.
    (2025) Relative importance of lexical features in word processing during L2 English reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263125101137
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263125101137 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ness, T., & Meltzer-Asscher, A.
    (2021) Rational adaptation in lexical prediction: The influence of prediction strength. Frontiers in Psychology, , Article 622873. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622873
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622873 [Google Scholar]
  38. Norman, T., & Degani, T.
    (2024) Context effects in the L2: Evidence for compensatory mechanisms. International Journal of Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1177/13670069231153301
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069231153301 [Google Scholar]
  39. Oxford University Press
    Oxford University Press (2001) Quick Placement Test.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pélissier, M., Haugland, D., Handeland, B., Urland, B. Z., & Wetterlin, A., Wheeldon, L., & Frisson, S.
    (2022) Competition between form-related words in bilingual sentence reading: Effects of language proficiency. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Perea, M., & Pollatsek, A.
    (1998) The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Perea, M., & Rosa, E.
    (2000) The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification tasks: A review. Psicológica, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L.
    (2002) The lexical quality hypothesis. InL. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.11.14per
     https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.11.14per [Google Scholar]
  44. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
    (2013) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, (), –. 10.1017/S0140525X12001495
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001495 [Google Scholar]
  45. Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K.
    (1999) The effects of neighborhood size in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2025) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A.
    (1986) Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/BF03197692
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197692 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rayner, K., & Raney, G. E.
    (1996) Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/BF03212426
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212426 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rayner, K., & Well, A. D.
    (1996) Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/BF03214555
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214555 [Google Scholar]
  50. Ryskin, R., & Nieuwland, M. S.
    (2023) Prediction during language comprehension: What is next?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, (), –. 10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I.
    (1998) Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, (), –. 10.3758/BF03201199
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201199 [Google Scholar]
  52. Škrjanec, I., & Demberg, V.
    (2026) Language models that match reader experience are better predictors of reading times. Journal of Memory and Language, , Article 104677. 10.1016/j.jml.2025.104677
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2025.104677 [Google Scholar]
  53. Stanovich, K. E.
    (1986) Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, (), –. 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
     https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1 [Google Scholar]
  54. Staub, A.
    (2015) The effect of lexical predictability on eye movements in reading: Critical review and theoretical interpretation. Language and Linguistics Compass, (), –. 10.1111/lnc3.12151
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12151 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sui, L., Woumans, E., Duyck, W., & Dirix, N.
    (2025) The word frequency effect in first- and second-language reading by Chinese and Dutch bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S136672892400035X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672892400035X [Google Scholar]
  56. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J.
    (1998) Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1998.2584
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2584 [Google Scholar]
  57. Whitford, V., & Titone, D.
    (2017) The effects of word frequency and word predictability during first- and second-language paragraph reading in bilingual older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, (), –. 10.1037/pag0000151
     https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000151 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.26019.liu
Loading
Sentence predictability and lexical factors during L2 reading
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.26019.liu
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.26019.liu
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.26019.liu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: eye movements ; L2 proficiency ; predictability ; orthographic neighbourhood size ; word frequency ; L2 reading

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error