1887
Volume 6, Issue 6
  • ISSN 1879-9264
  • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Comment

This is a commentary article in response to the following content:
The development of bimodal bilingualism
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lab.6.6.14que
2017-01-17
2025-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Donati, C. , & Branchini, C.
    (2013) Challenging linearization: Simultaneous mixing in the production of bimodal bilinguals. In T. Biberauer , & I. Roberts (Eds.), Challenges to Linearization (pp.93–128). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9781614512431.93
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512431.93 [Google Scholar]
  2. Lillo-Martin, D. , Müller de Quadros, R. , & Chen Pichler, D.
    (2016) The Development of Bimodal Bilingualism: Implications for Linguistic Theory. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. doi:  10.1075/lab.6.6.01lil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.6.6.01lil [Google Scholar]
  3. Neidle, C. , Kegl, J. , MacLaughlin, D. , Bahan, B. , & Lee, R.G.
    (2000) The Syntax of American Sign Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Pfau, R. , & Quer, J.
    (2002) V-to-Neg raising and negative concord in three sign languages. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 27, 73–86.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/lab.6.6.14que
Loading
  • Article Type: Article Commentary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error