oa Filtered collocations as features in verbal polysemy disambiguation

References

1. Apresjan, Jurij D.
   1973 Regular polysemy. Linguistics1421. 5–32.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atkins, Beryl T. & Kegl, Judy & Levin, Beth
   1988 Anatomy of a verb entry: From linguistic theory to lexicographic practice. International Journal of Lexicography11. 84–126. doi:  10.1093/ijl/1.2.84
   https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/1.2.84 [Google Scholar]
3. Blutner, Reinhard
   2002 Lexical semantics and pragmatics. Linguistische Berichte101. 27–58.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carston, Robyn
   2002 Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. doi:  10.1002/9780470754603
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
5. Chinese Knowledge Information Processing Group
   Chinese Knowledge Information Processing Group 1993 Technical report no. 93–05: Zhongwen cilei fenxi (sanban) [ The analysis of Chinese parts of speech (the third version) ]. Taipei: Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Davis, Anthony R. & Koenig, Jean-Pierre
   2000 Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon. Language76(1). 56–91. doi:  10.1353/lan.2000.0068
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2000.0068 [Google Scholar]
7. Falkum, Ingrid Lossius
   2007 Generativity, relevance and the problem of polysemy. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics191. 205–234.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Fodor, Jerry A. & Lepore, Ernie
   1998 The emptiness of the lexicon: Reflections on James Pustejovsky’s ‘The generative lexicon’. Linguistic Inquiry29(2). 269–288. doi:  10.1162/002438998553743
   https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553743 [Google Scholar]
9. Gale, William A. & Church, Kenneth W. & Yarowsky, David
   1993 A method for disambiguating word senses in a large corpus. Computers and the Humanities261. 415–439. doi:  10.1007/BF00136984
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136984 [Google Scholar]
10. Goddard, Cliff
    1998 Semantic analysis: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Jackendoff, Ray
    2002 Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
12. Kamp, Hans & Partee, Barbara
    1995 Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition57(2). 129–191. doi:  10.1016/0010‑0277(94)00659‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00659-9 [Google Scholar]
13. Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
    2005 Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511610479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479 [Google Scholar]
14. Moravcsik, Julius M.
    1975 Aitia as generative factor in Aristotle’s philosophy. Dialogue141. 622–636. doi:  10.1017/S001221730002655X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S001221730002655X [Google Scholar]
15. Partee, Barbara H.
    1992 Syntactic categories and semantic type. In Rosner, Michael & Johnson, Roderick (eds.), Computational linguistics and formal semantics, 97–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511611803.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611803.004 [Google Scholar]
16. Princeton University: About WordNet
    Princeton University: About WordNet 2010–2016 WordNet. (wordnet.princeton.edu) (Accessed2014-09-01.)
    [Google Scholar]
17. Pustejovsky, James
    1991 The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics17(4). 409–441.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Pustejovsky, James
    1995 The generative lexicon. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pustejovsky, James
    2005 A survey of dot objects. Waltham: Brandeis University. (Manuscript.)
    [Google Scholar]
20. Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
    1995 Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
21. van Esch, Daan
    2012 Leiden Weibo Corpus. (lwc.daanvanesch.nl/index.php) (Accessed2014-09-03.)
    [Google Scholar]
22. van ValinJr., Robert D.
    2005 Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511610578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
23. Weinreich, Uriel
    1964 Webster’s third: A critique of its semantics. International Journal of American Linguistics301. 405–409. doi:  10.1086/464799
    https://doi.org/10.1086/464799 [Google Scholar]
24. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1996 Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]