1887
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1606-822X
  • E-ISSN: 2309-5067
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In Generative Lexicon Theory () ( Pustejovsky 1995 ), co-composition is one of the generative devices proposed to explain the cases of verbal polysemous behavior where more than one function application is allowed. The English baking verbs were used as examples to illustrate how their arguments co-specify the verb with Some studies ( Blutner 2002 ; Carston 2002 ; Falkum 2007 ) stated that the information of pragmatics and world knowledge need to be considered as well. Therefore, this study would like to examine whether could be practiced in a real-world Natural Language Processing () application using collocations. We have conducted a fine-grained logical polysemy disambiguation task, taking the open-sourced Leiden Weibo Corpus as resource and computing with Support Vector Machine () classifier. Within the classifier, we have taken collocated verbs under as main features. In addition, measure words and syntactic patterns are extracted as additional features for comparison. Our study investigates the logical polysemy of the Chinese verb ‘bake’. We find that could help in identifying logically polysemous cases; additional features would help the classifier achieve a higher performance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00003.cha
2018-01-05
2019-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Apresjan, Jurij D.
    1973 Regular polysemy. Linguistics142. 5–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkins, Beryl T. & Kegl, Judy & Levin, Beth
    1988 Anatomy of a verb entry: From linguistic theory to lexicographic practice. International Journal of Lexicography1. 84–126. doi: 10.1093/ijl/1.2.84
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/1.2.84 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blutner, Reinhard
    2002 Lexical semantics and pragmatics. Linguistische Berichte10. 27–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carston, Robyn
    2002Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470754603
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chinese Knowledge Information Processing Group
    Chinese Knowledge Information Processing Group 1993Technical report no. 93–05: Zhongwen cilei fenxi (sanban) [ The analysis of Chinese parts of speech (the third version) ]. Taipei: Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, Anthony R. & Koenig, Jean-Pierre
    2000 Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon. Language76(1). 56–91. doi: 10.1353/lan.2000.0068
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2000.0068 [Google Scholar]
  7. Falkum, Ingrid Lossius
    2007 Generativity, relevance and the problem of polysemy. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics19. 205–234.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fodor, Jerry A. & Lepore, Ernie
    1998 The emptiness of the lexicon: Reflections on James Pustejovsky’s ‘The generative lexicon’. Linguistic Inquiry29(2). 269–288. doi: 10.1162/002438998553743
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438998553743 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gale, William A. & Church, Kenneth W. & Yarowsky, David
    1993 A method for disambiguating word senses in a large corpus. Computers and the Humanities26. 415–439. doi: 10.1007/BF00136984
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136984 [Google Scholar]
  10. Goddard, Cliff
    1998Semantic analysis: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jackendoff, Ray
    2002Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kamp, Hans & Partee, Barbara
    1995 Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition57(2). 129–191. doi: 10.1016/0010‑0277(94)00659‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00659-9 [Google Scholar]
  13. Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
    2005Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511610479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610479 [Google Scholar]
  14. Moravcsik, Julius M.
    1975 Aitia as generative factor in Aristotle’s philosophy. Dialogue14. 622–636. doi: 10.1017/S001221730002655X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S001221730002655X [Google Scholar]
  15. Partee, Barbara H.
    1992 Syntactic categories and semantic type. In Rosner, Michael & Johnson, Roderick (eds.), Computational linguistics and formal semantics, 97–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611803.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611803.004 [Google Scholar]
  16. Princeton University: About WordNet
    Princeton University: About WordNet 2010–2016WordNet. (wordnet.princeton.edu) (Accessed2014-09-01.)
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Pustejovsky, James
    1991 The generative lexicon. Computational Linguistics17(4). 409–441.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1995The generative lexicon. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2005 A survey of dot objects. Waltham: Brandeis University. (Manuscript.)
  20. Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
    1995Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. van Esch, Daan
    2012Leiden Weibo Corpus. (lwc.daanvanesch.nl/index.php) (Accessed2014-09-03.)
    [Google Scholar]
  22. van ValinJr., Robert D.
    2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511610578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
  23. Weinreich, Uriel
    1964 Webster’s third: A critique of its semantics. International Journal of American Linguistics30. 405–409. doi: 10.1086/464799
    https://doi.org/10.1086/464799 [Google Scholar]
  24. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1996Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00003.cha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/lali.00003.cha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): baking verb , co-composition , collocation , Generative Lexicon Theory and logical polysemy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error